Author Topic: Disturbing Evidence, which confirms that cops handed back silencer to the family  (Read 119595 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
I think it matters a lot because if it doesn't LOOK genuine, then it's likely not to be.

Why would someone fake a statement like that?

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
If it’s real, go to the press go to his lawyers get things moving, Kaldin asks why people aren’t more intrigued by this, Exactly that answers it.

This is what I don't understand. If this statement is genuine then it's potentially dynamite. I don't see how anyone could just sit on it and do nothing.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Why would someone fake a statement like that?

It takes all sorts to make a world.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
If it’s real, go to the press go to his lawyers get things moving, Kaldin asks why people aren’t more intrigued by this, Exactly that answers it.

Experience?
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
This is what I don't understand. If this statement is genuine then it's potentially dynamite. I don't see how anyone could just sit on it and do nothing.

I suggested doing something this morning - personally I wouldn't because I don't believe it's genuine but if others  do, perhaps it's about time they put their money where their mouth is?
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
I hate to be so outspoken here, but are people suggesting that Mike has doctored that document or even created it?

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
This is what I don't understand. If this statement is genuine then it's potentially dynamite. I don't see how anyone could just sit on it and do nothing.


Kaldin, I asked exactly that question when, within weeks of joining, Mike revealed that he had evidence which would mean imminent freedom for Jeremy -a revealing picture of Sheila on a bed with her nightdress hitched up. I suggested that it would be better placed in the hands of someone who could use it to benefit Jeremy. I believe the reason I was given for this not happening was that the time wasn't right. It MAY be that the time isn't right for this 'Disturbing Evidence' to be revealed.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
I hate to be so outspoken here, but are people suggesting that Mike has doctored that document or even created it?

It doesn't have to be Mike, Mike said he'd just acquired them - not sure from where. I don't believe it's genuine, if you do and you think it'd 'dynamite' you could be the one to start the ball rolling, if not, then you rally can't be that sure it's genuine either?
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
It doesn't have to be Mike, Mike said he'd just acquired them - not sure from where. I don't believe it's genuine, if you do and you think it'd 'dynamite' you could be the one to start the ball rolling, if not, then you rally can't be that sure it's genuine either?

I wouldn't know what to to do with it though. If Jeremy has a source who tells him what's on this forum, he could contact the right people.

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490

Kaldin, I asked exactly that question when, within weeks of joining, Mike revealed that he had evidence which would mean imminent freedom for Jeremy -a revealing picture of Sheila on a bed with her nightdress hitched up. I suggested that it would be better placed in the hands of someone who could use it to benefit Jeremy. I believe the reason I was given for this not happening was that the time wasn't right. It MAY be that the time isn't right for this 'Disturbing Evidence' to be revealed.
exactly jane.can i also add the photo that shows a banner on the roof with (mick was here)written on it ;)

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961

Kaldin, I asked exactly that question when, within weeks of joining, Mike revealed that he had evidence which would mean imminent freedom for Jeremy -a revealing picture of Sheila on a bed with her nightdress hitched up. I suggested that it would be better placed in the hands of someone who could use it to benefit Jeremy. I believe the reason I was given for this not happening was that the time wasn't right. It MAY be that the time isn't right for this 'Disturbing Evidence' to be revealed.

I recall the issue of the bed, but such a photo never materialised did it? This time, a photo of the document has been posted.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
I wouldn't know what to to do with it though. If Jeremy has a source who tells him what's on this forum, he could contact the right people.

This could be a start [email protected] - he's an innocent supporter and a reporter for The Guardian.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Why is everything on the document crossed out, and why are side notes scribbled out?

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
It doesn't have to be Mike, Mike said he'd just acquired them - not sure from where. I don't believe it's genuine, if you do and you think it'd 'dynamite' you could be the one to start the ball rolling, if not, then you rally can't be that sure it's genuine either?


Kaldin, it could go one of two ways. You COULD find yourself covered in glory, on the other hand you could find yourself covered in..................... something less sweet.

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
Maybe it’s a case of crying Wolf too many times, who Knows?
exactly ,justice the classic tale comes to mind :)) :))