It has long since been suspected or known that Essex police, the relatives and the lab' experts at Huntingdon, used two different silencers which they sought to present as the one and only silencer!
Clearly, there was never only just the one silencer...
Since, how did Ann Eaton and the family, still have possession not the silencer by 11th September 1975, if Ron Cook had already submitted 'it' to Huntingdon Lab' on the 30th August 1985?
Ann Eaton, Essex police, and the experts at Huntingdon Lab' all played a role in the handing over of the second silencer by Ann Eaton to DC Oakey on 11th September 1985, the fact that this second silencer was fingerprinted by DS Eastwood and DS Davidson on the 14th September 1985, and that eventually on the 20th September 1985, that Essex police should be submitting it to the Lab' with a request that 'it' be checked for blood and fibers?
I mean, hang on there was supposedly already a silencer at the Lab' which arrived there on the 30th August 1985, a silencer inside which was discovered a loose dried flake of blood by the 12th September 1985, which when analysed produced the four key blood group results belonging to Sheila Caffell, and Robert Boutflour! So, why are Essex police submitting a second silencer to the same lab' on the 20th September 1985, requesting that 'it' be checked for blood?
What also becomes somewhat obvious is that the first silencer was never known or referred to by any exhibit reference, other than 'SJ/1'(22), or 'DB/1'(23), and that the silencer which Ann Eaton handed over to dC Oakey on the 11th September 1985, is the 'DRB/1' silencer which came to be exhibited during Jeremy Bambers trial during October 1986. We know this is true because on the 11th September 1985, Ann Eaton handed over to DC Oakey several items of evidential value, which bore the original exhibit references of DRB/4, DRB/3, and DRB/2! We know that she also handed over the second silencer on this date because police records confirm this - the silencer handed over to DC Oakey on that date had the exhibit reference of DRB/1, in other words, court exhibit No.9...
It stands to reason, therefore, that the second silencer (DRB/1) was not the same silencer inside which Fletcher and Hayward found the blood group evidence attributed uniquely to Sheila Caffell. The key blood evidence must have been found inside the other silencer (DB/1), the silencer which Essex police took to the Lab' at Huntingdon on the 30th August 1985...
So, why did the prosecution rely upon the key blood group evidence and the paint from the kitchen aga evidence as being applicable to only one of the two silencers? Sheila's blood could not have been found inside the silencer marked 'DRB/1', because that second silencer arrived at the lab' long after the blood that was present in the first silencer (DB/1) was matched as being unique and exclusive to Sheila Caffell!
Jeremy Bamber was stitched up by the state irganisions and his relatives using dodgy silencer, blood and paint evidence which it was impossible to have been found on the same item! There were two silencers, Sheila's blood in the first of these two (DB/1) and paint from the kitchen aga surround ingrained into the second silencer (DRB/1)...
Two silencers, not one silencer, blood in one, paint on the other. Yet to be fathomed out was if these five shootings had only involved one gun, why the key evidence was found on two different silencers? Since, why would the shooter attach a different silencer to the same guns barrel during the attack on Neville Bamber downstairs in the kitchen, and upon Sheila Caffell upstairs in the main bedroom!
Cops and the dastardly CPS knew the significance of the existence of the two silencers, each one the bearer of blood, or paint!
There is now a chunk of light in sight at the end of Jeremy Bambers plight!
He was stitched up, by Essex police, by his relatives, by the experts at the lab' and by the CPS....
Judgement day for the conspirators is looming large, justice must surely prevail in this case, an innocent man has been incarcerated in prison for over three decades, convicted by dishonest evidence!
