Before I do so, however, I would first of all like to say that in cases where 'a solitary perpetrator' commits an offence, or a series of offences, without involvement, or speculation from any other party, it is usually the case, that after the arrest, decision to prosecute and at the trial of such an offender, there is almost always forensic or scieentific evidence to link the accused to the crime. In the instant case, there does not exist any such forensic or scientific evidence which places Jeremy Bamber as the killer - it all boils down to presumption and speculation, which of course is not evidence!
