Questions for Mike Tesko

[Hartley]

Also the soaked clothes are not described as blood soaked, Sheila's knickers looked as if she had a period and been caught out. That is a hundred million miles away from a bucket full of blood soaked clothes!

[chochokeira]

Harters, as I understand it, this clothing had only just come to light and the police had not previously seen it.

It is inconceivable that blood stained clothing found at the site of a masacre and identified as belonging to the person then accepted to be the killer was not handed into the police for detailed forensic examination and that it was instead removed and destroyed.

Choc, Jackie et el.

This is taken from Ann Eatons COLP statement, it seems that people who are saying she took the soaked clothes home with her are somewhat mistaken. She clearly states that she rinsed them out and put them in the bin.

Well I'm glad that's been cleared up!

There were two statements, weren't there Harters, or another section of this statement on this issue? In one of these I'm sure I recall AE mentioning how she persuaded a police officer present that the blood on the clothes was menstrual blood - which would have meant it was of little or no significance in respect of the murders. AE suggested that she could smell the difference between menstrual and non-menstrual blood.

[Hartley]

Harters, as I understand it, this clothing had only just come to light and the police had not previously seen it.

It is inconceivable that blood stained clothing found at the site of a masacre and identified as belonging to the person then accepted to be the killer was not handed into the police for detailed forensic examination and that it was instead removed and destroyed.

Choc, Jackie et el.

This is taken from Ann Eatons COLP statement, it seems that people who are saying she took the soaked clothes home with her are somewhat mistaken. She clearly states that she rinsed them out and put them in the bin.

Well I'm glad that's been cleared up!

There were two statements, weren't there Harters, or another section of this statement on this issue? In one of these I'm sure I recall AE mentioning how she persuaded a police officer present that the blood on the clothes was menstrual blood - which would have meant it was of little or no significance in respect of the murders. AE suggested that she could smell the difference between menstrual non-menstrual blood.

I'm not sure Choc, I've lost track of what's on here and what isn't. I'll have a search around to see if I can find anything else.

[chochokeira]

Thanks, Harters. Weren't there also two buckets of clothes?

[bob]

Ann Eatons complete COLP statement can be viewed here:
http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,497.msg8443.html#msg8443

Lots of interesting stuff, such as why JM went with Ann to identify the bodies.

You're living up to your legend status Harts 
+1

[Alias]

Harters, as I understand it, this clothing had only just come to light and the police had not previously seen it.

It is inconceivable that blood stained clothing found at the site of a masacre and identified as belonging to the person then accepted to be the killer was not handed into the police for detailed forensic examination and that it was instead removed and destroyed.

Choc, Jackie et el.

This is taken from Ann Eatons COLP statement, it seems that people who are saying she took the soaked clothes home with her are somewhat mistaken. She clearly states that she rinsed them out and put them in the bin.

Well I'm glad that's been cleared up!

There were two statements, weren't there Harters, or another section of this statement on this issue? In one of these I'm sure I recall AE mentioning how she persuaded a police officer present that the blood on the clothes was menstrual blood - which would have meant it was of little or no significance in respect of the murders. AE suggested that she could smell the difference between menstrual and non-menstrual blood.

I have read that too, but I cannot remember where - it was when I was completely new to the case.

[Hartley]

Thanks, Harters. Weren't there also two buckets of clothes?

That's what I thought too, but I can't find any reference to two buckets now, I'll keep digging though. 

[Hartley]

Ann Eatons complete COLP statement can be viewed here:
http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,497.msg8443.html#msg8443

Lots of interesting stuff, such as why JM went with Ann to identify the bodies.

You're living up to your legend status Harts 
+1

Haha I don't know about that so much but cheers have a +1 back at ya. 

[chochokeira]

Harters, as I understand it, this clothing had only just come to light and the police had not previously seen it.

It is inconceivable that blood stained clothing found at the site of a masacre and identified as belonging to the person then accepted to be the killer was not handed into the police for detailed forensic examination and that it was instead removed and destroyed.

Choc, Jackie et el.

This is taken from Ann Eatons COLP statement, it seems that people who are saying she took the soaked clothes home with her are somewhat mistaken. She clearly states that she rinsed them out and put them in the bin.

Well I'm glad that's been cleared up!

There were two statements, weren't there Harters, or another section of this statement on this issue? In one of these I'm sure I recall AE mentioning how she persuaded a police officer present that the blood on the clothes was menstrual blood - which would have meant it was of little or no significance in respect of the murders. AE suggested that she could smell the difference between menstrual non-menstrual blood.

I'm not sure Choc, I've lost track of what's on here and what isn't. I'll have a search around to see if I can find anything else.

Here you are, Harters, from the '[Sheila's feet thread:


Re: Sheila's feet
« Reply #30 on: February 13, 2011, 10:13:PM »Quote Quote from: andrea on February 13, 2011, 10:05:PM

there is mention also on the sleuthing site of conversation and a police officer. anne eaton says "menstrual blood smells different doesnt it" officer replies "well you make sure you tell the that in court if your asked" im sure mike could locate the document for us to see?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes, Ann Eaton spoke about this when COLP interviewed her in 1991 - she said that the defense would probably try to suggest that the silencer had been deliberately contaminated with the blood from the knickers which she had taken away from whf, and how she had told DCS Ainsley that she could tell the difference between ordinary blood, and menstrual blood because of the smell, to which Ainsley is supposed to have said to her something along the lines "you remember to say that in the witness box if you are asked about it"...

Yes, I will try to locate that document for viewing...
« Last Edit: February 13, 2011, 10:14:PM by mike tesko »
Report to moderator    Logged

[Hartley]

Thanks Choc, so that's just somebodies (Mike T's) post is it? Or is there a document in which it's stated?

[Hartley]

As far as I can see (which means nothing) Anns COLP statement does not mention this at all.

[Hartley]

It's from the same statement that I posted above: here's an extract:

[Hartley]

I think that pretty much concludes the matter now though.

So back to what people were saying about how they thought the relatives were weird because they took a bucket of bloody clothes home and washed them. It doesn't seem to be the case!

Perhaps people shouldn't believe everything they read, check things out yourself, then double check and then still keep an open mind. 

[Alias]

Thanks Hartley - this is exactly what I saw.

Something else. Why on Earth would Jones ask Ann Eaton if she had had an affair with Jeremy???

[chochokeira]

It's from the same statement that I posted above: here's an extract:

Thanks, Harters, you're a sweetheart - said merely in a friendly way, shona! I don't suppose you happen to have the section/s leading up to this too, Harters?