Author Topic: Questions for Mike Tesko  (Read 31748 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Hartley

  • Guest
Re: Questions for Mike Tesko
« Reply #165 on: June 07, 2011, 09:45:PM »
Hartley
If bullying gets someone a retrial so be it and I would definately been called a bully if I had been the person cross examining Mugford I wouldnt have fallen for the tears

Vicvid has stated many things on this forum which blatently contradicts everything I had read or even what people have told me in person.

There is not one single thing that Neville could have done to deserve getting punched nothing I hate any kind of violence and to say that Peter Eaton never got over Nevilles death I personally do not believe it.  As a friend of the family why doesnt Vic post some happy family photos when all the families spent Christmas together.
I am also quite disturbed about Nanny Speakman I want to look into that more this doesnt sound nice at all.
What do you think about what Grahame posted about that.
I will keep asking questions
I really only found out about JM and the newspaper deal today from Ngb1066

I have not asked anything difficult in my questions to Vicvid I would like his thoughts

Jackie crack on and ask away.

My only advice to you is that if you are indeed actually asking for information from somebody then you get better results if you were a little more polite when asking your questions.

At the end of the day I couldn't care either way, now that your attention is elsewhere it takes the heat off me.

With regards to the two marks between thumb and forefinger on Sheila's right hand, hold your hand out as if you are waving at somebody, do you see two shadows either side of your tendons? It could be a possibilty.

Jackiepreece

  • Guest
Re: Questions for Mike Tesko
« Reply #166 on: June 07, 2011, 09:52:PM »
plus 1 Andrea

Jackiepreece

  • Guest
Re: Questions for Mike Tesko
« Reply #167 on: June 07, 2011, 09:54:PM »
Hartley
I will take your comments on board and try and be a bit more easier on people

If you met me in person you would like me I promise

Hartley

  • Guest
Re: Questions for Mike Tesko
« Reply #168 on: June 07, 2011, 09:56:PM »
Hartley
I will take your comments on board and try and be a bit more easier on people

If you met me in person you would like me I promise

Fair play to you Jackie.  8)

Offline shonapugs

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2669
Re: Questions for Mike Tesko
« Reply #169 on: June 07, 2011, 10:06:PM »
Good evening, Andy, my little duck.

andrea

  • Guest
Re: Questions for Mike Tesko
« Reply #170 on: June 07, 2011, 10:11:PM »
hello shona  ;D hows tha doing ?

Offline shonapugs

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2669
Re: Questions for Mike Tesko
« Reply #171 on: June 07, 2011, 10:15:PM »
Crappy day, but the tablets are kicking now. Thanks for asking!!

Jackiepreece

  • Guest
Re: Questions for Mike Tesko
« Reply #172 on: June 07, 2011, 11:47:PM »
Shona as you are a definately guilty I wanted to ask you about something I bought up with Ngb this deal Mugford had with the newspaper. Ngb1066 with his legal background said it was very unlikely that Mugford would have got the NOTW £25,000 deal if JB was found not guilty.  The jury as I am aware did not know this I would like your thoughts and also I would like your thoughts about the nanny speakman thing

Offline vidvic

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2941
  • R.i 99.9
Re: Questions for Mike Tesko
« Reply #173 on: June 07, 2011, 11:48:PM »
Hartley
If bullying gets someone a retrial so be it and I would definately been called a bully if I had been the person cross examining Mugford I wouldnt have fallen for the tears

Vicvid has stated many things on this forum which blatently contradicts everything I had read or even what people have told me in person.

There is not one single thing that Neville could have done to deserve getting punched nothing I hate any kind of violence and to say that Peter Eaton never got over Nevilles death I personally do not believe it.  As a friend of the family why doesnt Vic post some happy family photos when all the families spent Christmas together.
I am also quite disturbed about Nanny Speakman I want to look into that more this doesnt sound nice at all.
What do you think about what Grahame posted about that.
I will keep asking questions
I really only found out about JM and the newspaper deal today from Ngb1066

I have not asked anything difficult in my questions to Vicvid I would like his thoughts

Well, for a start, Granny Speakman was never in a nursing home in Maldon
rumor vagatus stulti et acceptantur a Idiotae

chochokeira

  • Guest
Re: Questions for Mike Tesko
« Reply #174 on: June 07, 2011, 11:50:PM »
Yes it is very dangerous when you get this kind of person with claims of special powers involved and this proves so called interpretation proves it. vidvic you ask whether this makes Julie Mugford's testimony "completely" believable? Well remember she said Jeremy had told her he had hired a hit man. Now you either believe her, or this dreamer?

The fact that JM said that JB told her a hitman did it has always made her testimony MORE believable in my eyes, rather than her just simply blaming JB.

Would you not agree that my questions to Mike are fair?
But you didn't answer my question vidvic. This man said Jeremy put the murder into Sheila's mind. If he did that then Julie mugford was incorrect. So what do you believe? since it was you who are basing your questions on the words of a "psychic". As for your questions to Mike, well he's got to make up his mind whether to believe this man, or believe what he stated yesterday that he believes Jeremy to be completely innocent from any blame? In that context, yes your questions are fair.

Dear Grahame,

What mike actually said is.....

Please do not worry over me, I will be here until as long as I can be, forever supporting Jeremy because I know whole heartedly that he did not and could not have been responsible for killing any m,embers of his family inside whf, including for the fact that he did not kill his sister, nor did he stage manage her body to make it appear as though, or look like she had taken her own life...

This is a clever play on words. He's just saying that Jeremy wasn't there at the farm, did not kill his sister, etc etc. He is not saying that he didn't prime her to do it for him.....

Vic... no offence meant... I'm interested in your approach to the case and welcome your slant on it. But the thing is, how would Jeremy or for that matter anyone else, 'prime' Sheila?  It's all getting a bit 'Manchurian Candidate' or '39 Steps' isn't it?  Do you think that Jeremy, upon scrapping his idea of drugging the family and setting fire to the farmhouse, decided that it would be far easier to use some kind of ju ju mental projection?  Perhaps he saw a window of opportunity, when he realised Sheila's Haloperidol dose had been reduced?

You deserve +10 for this, Rocky

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: Questions for Mike Tesko
« Reply #175 on: June 07, 2011, 11:53:PM »
Hartley
I will take your comments on board and try and be a bit more easier on people

If you met me in person you would like me I promise

Fair play to you Jackie.  8)
Aha! he's got his cool shades on now. ;D

Offline shonapugs

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2669
Re: Questions for Mike Tesko
« Reply #176 on: June 07, 2011, 11:53:PM »
Do you know what, Jack? I'm not a definitely guilty. I wobble.

chochokeira

  • Guest
Re: Questions for Mike Tesko
« Reply #177 on: June 08, 2011, 12:05:AM »
Vidvic

I would like to watch the history one whats it called?

Chochkeira into history too I know she would love to as well I just mess about making jb videos I like to see professionals at work

http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=3&ved=0CDcQtwIwAg&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3D3sk7fGHPXdk&rct=j&q=merlins%20over%20malta&ei=0WjtTcNjj7SEB9bU2YkD&usg=AFQjCNGTTIu2A9zi6kaM2XUAv78Upg9s_w&sig2=1jmx88SIcSv2SNOST4QTHA&cad=rja

Good film, Vic! I love the vertiginous shots from the planes.

Offline vidvic

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2941
  • R.i 99.9
Re: Questions for Mike Tesko
« Reply #178 on: June 08, 2011, 12:07:AM »
Vidvic

I would like to watch the history one whats it called?

Chochkeira into history too I know she would love to as well I just mess about making jb videos I like to see professionals at work

http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=3&ved=0CDcQtwIwAg&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3D3sk7fGHPXdk&rct=j&q=merlins%20over%20malta&ei=0WjtTcNjj7SEB9bU2YkD&usg=AFQjCNGTTIu2A9zi6kaM2XUAv78Upg9s_w&sig2=1jmx88SIcSv2SNOST4QTHA&cad=rja

Good film, Vic! I love the vertiginous shots from the planes.

lol.....I had to look up vertiginous.......rofl
rumor vagatus stulti et acceptantur a Idiotae

chochokeira

  • Guest
Re: Questions for Mike Tesko
« Reply #179 on: June 08, 2011, 12:27:AM »
Vidvic

I would like to watch the history one whats it called?

Chochkeira into history too I know she would love to as well I just mess about making jb videos I like to see professionals at work

http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=3&ved=0CDcQtwIwAg&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3D3sk7fGHPXdk&rct=j&q=merlins%20over%20malta&ei=0WjtTcNjj7SEB9bU2YkD&usg=AFQjCNGTTIu2A9zi6kaM2XUAv78Upg9s_w&sig2=1jmx88SIcSv2SNOST4QTHA&cad=rja

Good film, Vic! I love the vertiginous shots from the planes.

lol.....I had to look up vertiginous.......rofl

Blimey... ::)