Author Topic: Questions for Mike Tesko  (Read 31747 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Hartley

  • Guest
Re: Questions for Mike Tesko
« Reply #135 on: June 07, 2011, 08:32:PM »
You didn't answer my question.  ???

Jackiepreece

  • Guest
Re: Questions for Mike Tesko
« Reply #136 on: June 07, 2011, 08:35:PM »
Vicvid as you havent answered my previous questions I just wanted to slip one more in

After reading Ngb1066 post saying that Mugford most likely would not have been able to sell a story on JB if he was found to be not guilty

Do you think JB had a fair trial in view of this and the fact that JM would get a bonus decided by the outcome of the trial.
As I understand it the jururs were not told of the newspaper deal or the bonus on Jeremys conviction

Do you think this was fair



Hartley read my post CAREFULLY I will answer your question after all mine have been answered.

I WAS FIRST

Offline vidvic

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2941
  • R.i 99.9
Re: Questions for Mike Tesko
« Reply #137 on: June 07, 2011, 08:37:PM »
Been a bit busy so taken a while to respond.

Yes, I am a TV Producer and yes, I have known the family for many many years. I originally worked for Anglia TV and Sky News (right from it's very beginning) though in 2004 concentrated on sport.

I am proud to say I know this family. They are good people. I probably get more annoyed than I should when I read about them as 'greedy', 'liars' and the like, because it is unrecognisable to the people that I know.

Please don't accuse me of not listening to the JB version of events either. I read and view everything I can lay my hands on and I respect Mike Tesko for his tenacity, though obviously I believe misguided.

Yes, it does not take a rocket scientist to see that the Police made many errors, but JB is in prison despite these errors, not because of them.

I know many journalists that have spent thousands of hours doing exactly what some of you do, asking questions, reading statements, testing theories. The vast majority that I have met agree with me and the appeal court judges, in that the more you know about this case, the more convinced you become of JB's guilt.

Hartley
If you will read the above you will know why I am asking the questions I am and yes I am quite capable of sticking up for myself but I put a number of questions to vicvid and I would like an answer.  He seems to know all the details of everything and when I get my answers I will deal with yours

Jackie, since I started posting on the forum you have done nothing other than try to discredit me.

I have enjoyed debating with many people on here who hold exactly the opposite view to myself, but can debate in a sensible and inteligent manner.

If you want to only hear from people who agree with your own view, go somewhere else.

Like I said yesterday, I find your attitude as one of a school ground bully.
rumor vagatus stulti et acceptantur a Idiotae

Offline VORTEX

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 161
  • ROCH INDEX 22
Re: Questions for Mike Tesko
« Reply #138 on: June 07, 2011, 08:38:PM »
There was a legal battle between the relatives (Eatons, Boutflours / Pargeters) which gained considerable momentum once Jeremy was convicted by a reliance upon their evidence, and subsequently taken out of the equation...


There are many who believe that this is what motivated the relatives to testify in support of the prosecutions case, to help get Jeremy convicted of these murders...

It is quite clear to me that money was more important to the Eaton's, Boutflour's and the Pargeter's than anything else. They argued fiercely about it long after Jeremy was sentenced in 1986. Anthony Pargeter has suffered his own mental anguish which was all brought about by fighting about money with the rest of the
family. Pargeter fell out with them in a big way...........guess what it was all about.........money again.

lucy70

  • Guest
Re: Questions for Mike Tesko
« Reply #139 on: June 07, 2011, 08:40:PM »
There was a legal battle between the relatives (Eatons, Boutflours / Pargeters) which gained considerable momentum once Jeremy was convicted by a reliance upon their evidence, and subsequently taken out of the equation...


There are many who believe that this is what motivated the relatives to testify in support of the prosecutions case, to help get Jeremy convicted of these murders...

It is quite clear to me that money was more important to the Eaton's, Boutflour's and the Pargeter's than anything else. They argued fiercely about it long after Jeremy was sentenced in 1986. Anthony Pargeter has suffered his own mental anguish which was all brought about by fighting about money with the rest of the
family. Pargeter fell out with them in a big way...........guess what it was all about.........money again.
You know this for a fact?
Would like to see your evidence  ;)

Hartley

  • Guest
Re: Questions for Mike Tesko
« Reply #140 on: June 07, 2011, 08:40:PM »
Also Jackie, as I've told you before, whilst I don't agree with your views, I respect that you have them. Personally, if someone came on here saying they are good friends with the family, then instead of butting heads at every opportunity, I would consider entering into discussions to try and glean some of that inside information, he might not be around forever and the chance to obtain an insight might not present itself again for a long time if at all. You desperate for the truth aren't you?

That's just my view though.  :-\
« Last Edit: June 07, 2011, 08:44:PM by Hartley »

Hartley

  • Guest
Re: Questions for Mike Tesko
« Reply #141 on: June 07, 2011, 08:42:PM »
Vicvid as you havent answered my previous questions I just wanted to slip one more in

After reading Ngb1066 post saying that Mugford most likely would not have been able to sell a story on JB if he was found to be not guilty

Do you think JB had a fair trial in view of this and the fact that JM would get a bonus decided by the outcome of the trial.
As I understand it the jururs were not told of the newspaper deal or the bonus on Jeremys conviction

Do you think this was fair



Hartley read my post CAREFULLY I will answer your question after all mine have been answered.

I WAS FIRST

No that's not acceptable to me, I asked you before Vic was even on here and I'd like an answer please.

Jackiepreece

  • Guest
Re: Questions for Mike Tesko
« Reply #142 on: June 07, 2011, 08:44:PM »
Hartley
Its like old times I love fighting with you

I think it was vicvids comments that Peter Eaton never got over Nevilles death that maybe made me feel a bit hostile

Next he will be telling me JM gave her £25,000 to charity because she was a wonderful person

Jackiepreece

  • Guest
Re: Questions for Mike Tesko
« Reply #143 on: June 07, 2011, 08:48:PM »
What do you mean Hartley not acceptable go and find the post and the date and then I will go back and check all my old posts to see if you have answered all my questions

Now you are being a silly boy

I think vicvid is probably on the verge of giving me long detailed responses to all my questions he might even have a photo tucked away of the bucket and then I will answer yours if your not tucked up in bed with the missus and a cup of cocoa


andrea

  • Guest
Re: Questions for Mike Tesko
« Reply #144 on: June 07, 2011, 08:49:PM »
just going back to the picures that abs blew up of sheilas hands, if  you look on youtube and find the video where one of the coppers is being interviewed (bews?) he is shown pics of sheila on a laptop, you can see the marks on sheilas hands even on that. i paused it otherwise i would have missed it, but they're there. oh and good evening all  :) ive just got home from work.

Offline vidvic

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2941
  • R.i 99.9
Re: Questions for Mike Tesko
« Reply #145 on: June 07, 2011, 08:50:PM »
Hartley
Its like old times I love fighting with you

I think it was vicvids comments that Peter Eaton never got over Nevilles death that maybe made me feel a bit hostile

Next he will be telling me JM gave her £25,000 to charity because she was a wonderful person

And it's horrible comments like that, and it's Nevill, no E, about a relationship you have absolutely NO knowledge about, are wrong about and are spreading lies about, that lose all my respect.
rumor vagatus stulti et acceptantur a Idiotae

Hartley

  • Guest
Re: Questions for Mike Tesko
« Reply #146 on: June 07, 2011, 08:53:PM »
Hartley
Its like old times I love fighting with you

I think it was vicvids comments that Peter Eaton never got over Nevilles death that maybe made me feel a bit hostile

Next he will be telling me JM gave her £25,000 to charity because she was a wonderful person

You too, have a virtual :beer: on me  :)

All I'm saying Jackie is that there isn't really any need to be hostile is there? Instead you could ask Vic how this 'never got over it' has manifested itself, you never know you may learn some inside knowledge that you can't get anywhere else.

You know JM bought a flat, what you don't know is if anything Vic has posted is innaccurate, sure you don't need to take it as gospel without it being corroborated, but his views are just as valid as yours or mine.

You are a bully though. ;D

andrea

  • Guest
Re: Questions for Mike Tesko
« Reply #147 on: June 07, 2011, 09:08:PM »
just going back to the picures that abs blew up of sheilas hands, if  you look on youtube and find the video where one of the coppers is being interviewed (bews?) he is shown pics of sheila on a laptop, you can see the marks on sheilas hands even on that. i paused it otherwise i would have missed it, but they're there. oh and good evening all  :) ive just got home from work.





EVENING ALL, ignorant gits  ;D ;D

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: Questions for Mike Tesko
« Reply #148 on: June 07, 2011, 09:13:PM »
just going back to the picures that abs blew up of sheilas hands, if  you look on youtube and find the video where one of the coppers is being interviewed (bews?) he is shown pics of sheila on a laptop, you can see the marks on sheilas hands even on that. i paused it otherwise i would have missed it, but they're there. oh and good evening all  :) ive just got home from work.





EVENING ALL, ignorant gits  ;D ;D

EVENING!!  ;D ;D ;D

andrea

  • Guest
Re: Questions for Mike Tesko
« Reply #149 on: June 07, 2011, 09:14:PM »
thats ace thanks abs  ;D ;D