was there a redail feture on the phone.

[Caroline]

Julie does mention the 'portable' redial phone prior to the massacre in her WS. Which matches the COA.

Yep, but no mention of the TFG using it, so I don't know what doc  evidence Lomax is referring to. I once emailed him and asked him to clarify something he claimed i his book and he referred me to the CT 

[maggie]

Yep, but no mention of the TFG using it, so I don't know what doc  evidence Lomax is referring to. I once emailed him and asked him to clarify something he claimed i his book and he referred me to the CT 

He does very much believe JB innocent however, cannot see any advantage in writing that particular passage to prove innocence, it is imo unbiased.  This subject wsa debated at length in the past on here which is why I remembered it.  I think the phone model was a Statesman but I culd be wrong. 

[guest2181]

Yep, but no mention of the TFG using it, so I don't know what doc  evidence Lomax is referring to. I once emailed him and asked him to clarify something he claimed i his book and he referred me to the CT 

It originated from the entry in this log at 8:20.

[nugnug]

as there no suggestion nevile from the office phone its largely irrelevant anyway.

[guest2181]

He does very much believe JB innocent however, cannot see any advantage in writing that particular passage to prove innocence, it is imo unbiased.  This subject wsa debated at length in the past on here which is why I remembered it.  I think the phone model was a Statesman but I culd be wrong.

Wasn't it a sceptre 100? 

http://www.britishtelephones.com/t10001.htm

[maggie]

Wasn't it a sceptre 100? 

http://www.britishtelephones.com/t10001.htm

Yes, it is thank you harters. 

I found it in search a few mins ago.  I have to admit since I started using windows 10, I cannot do links.  I used to tell others how to do it with widows 7 but windows 10 is a whole different ballgame,would be grateful to anyone who can give me a clue. .

[Caroline]

It originated from the entry in this log at 8:20.

That doesn't say that anyone 'used' the landline.

[Caroline]

He does very much believe JB innocent however, cannot see any advantage in writing that particular passage to prove innocence, it is imo unbiased.  This subject wsa debated at length in the past on here which is why I remembered it.  I think the phone model was a Statesman but I culd be wrong.

I don't believe anyone can help showing a particular bias based on what you believe to be true. The book argues very much from an innocent stance.

To paste a link all you so is copy what is displayed in the browser site information field and paste it to the post .

[guest2181]

That doesn't say that anyone 'used' the landline.

Nope.

[maggie]

I don't believe anyone can help showing a particular bias based on what you believe to be true. The book argues very much from an innocent stance.

To paste a link all you so is copy what is displayed in the browser site information field and paste it to the post .

I've sorted it thanks Caroline, my mouse pad is a bit weird and couldn't bring up the menu but have discovered how to do it ..... finally.

I agree up to a point but he simply stated that the phone may have been used to contact the police station by either of two people which would explain why the last dialed number was in fact the police station.  He does go on to question whether Nevill may have used that phone to call the police which is a different point.  I have never believes Nevill phoned the station anyway.
It doesn't change the fact that there was a phone in the office with a last dial number memory which was the reason I posted the quotes as Adam insisted there was no such phone.

[nugnug]

so basiacally you have the word of juliy mugford vs the word of scott lomax.

[Steve_uk]

so basiacally you have the word of juliy mugford vs the word of scott lomax.

He doesn't discuss any of her statement.

[nugnug]

ecen if there was a redial button on the office phone i dont think it makes that much diffrence if there had been one on the kitchen phone it would,

whaat i cant fathem is why the police would use the office when they could of just used there radio.

[maggie]

ecen if there was a redial button on the office phone i dont think it makes that much diffrence if there had been one on the kitchen phone it would,

whaat i cant fathem is why the police would use the office when they could of just used there radio.

I guess if Peter Simpson needed to phone DCI Harris it does make some sense that he may have chosen to use the office phone which was a bit more private.

[nugnug]

I guess if Peter Simpson needed to phone DCI Harris it does make some sense that he may have chosen to use the office phone which was a bit more private.

who would he want privacy from there only other cops there.