Why did jeremy say this.

[lookout]

I provide sources. Espescially if creating a thread & saying a person said something.

Hopefully Nugs will provide his source to support his thread post. Third request.

Most repeat of who said what,admitted by yourself,so where does that information come from ?

[Adam]

Most repeat of who said what,admitted by yourself,so where does that information come from ?

I have no idea what that means.

[Adam]

How does jeremys repeated cliam that he saw a male figure in the house sqaure with him trying to frame sheila.

Hopefully Nugs will provide his sources for his thread statement.

Forth request.

[lookout]

I have no idea what that means.

Of course you know what I mean.It's your pugnaciousness getting in the way again.

[Adam]

Hopefully Nugs will provide a source for his created thread. Fifth request.

Otherwise why create a thread on something that wasn't said ?

[lookout]

Oh do shut up about the threads. There are others besides yourself who are permitted you know 

[Adam]

Oh do shut up about the threads. There are others besides yourself who are permitted you know 

There doesn't seem to be a source.

You have spent two pages defending Nugs's thread. However failed to provide the required source.

I just don't know why Nugs would create a thread question on something he knew Bamber didn't say.

[lookout]

There doesn't seem to be a source.

You have spent two pages defending Nugs's thread. However failed to provide the required source.

I just don't know why Nugs would create a thread question on something he knew Bamber didn't say.

What a moaning old fart you are. Dear me. The same reason you create threads saying things that Bamber supposedly/allegedly said.
Why do you feel that you have to be top dog in threads ?

[Adam]

What a moaning old fart you are. Dear me. The same reason you create threads saying things that Bamber supposedly/allegedly said.
Why do you feel that you have to be top dog in threads ?

Seeing that you're over 50 years older than me, and have been complaining about Bamber being in prison for the last 32 years, I would say you're the 'moaning old fart'.

I just want to know why Nugs creates thread questions on something that was not said. He's done it before.

[lookout]

Seeing that you're over 50 years older than me, and have been complaining about Bamber being in prison for the last 32 years, I would say you're the 'moaning old fart'.

I just want to know why Nugs creates thread questions on things that were not said. He's done it before.

There's nothing wrong with the thread ( apart from the fact that you're moaning because you didn't start it )
I'll repeat,that besides being in JB's statement,it's also in Saxby's that ALL THREE saw the outline of a figure at the window.

[Adam]

There's nothing wrong with the thread ( apart from the fact that you're moaning because you didn't start it )
I'll repeat,that besides being in JB's statement,it's also in Saxby's that ALL THREE saw the outline of a figure at the window.

So the police & Bamber saw a person in the window. Surprised it was passed off as a 'trick of the light'.

Why would Bamber have to tell the police it was a male he saw, if the police also saw it ?

Where in Bamber's or the police's WS does it say Bamber told the police it was a 'male' person he saw ?

[lookout]

So the police & Bamber saw a person in the window. Surprised it was passed off as a 'trick of the light'.

Why would Bamber have to tell the police it was a male he saw, if the police also saw it ?

Where in Bamber's or the police's WS does it say Bamber told the police it was a 'male' person he saw ?

It was one of the officers who'd described the figure as being a male,not JB.

[Adam]

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,6179.msg274750.html#msg274750

I'm still waiting for a source from Nugs that the police said to Matthew Macdonald 'we know you called Jeremy from WHF'.

So I am not expecting a source from Nugs that Bamber told the police he saw a 'male' in the window. Despite 5 requests.

I just can't see the point in saying something was said when it wasn't. Then creating a thread question on something that does not exist.

[Caroline]

It was one of the officers who'd described the figure as being a male,not JB.

Never heard anyone describe the figure as being male - just here.

[Adam]

Never heard anyone describe the figure as being male - just here.

It does waste a lot of time if Nugs creates a thread asking a question on something that was not said. Which he does do.

If he made an error he should say so. However he just ignores source requests.