Why did jeremy say this.

[nugnug]

How does jeremys repeated cliam that he saw a male figure in the house sqaure with him trying to frame sheila.

[guest2181]

How does jeremys repeated cliam that he saw a male figure in the house sqaure with him trying to frame sheila.

If you read his own letters, he didn't actually see anybody.

[Adam]

I thought a figure was mistakedly seen. Not sure how anyone can determine if it was a man or woman.

Anyway, it was determined as a trick of the light.

[Adam]

Bamber saying he saw someone in the window, even if he said it was a man, supports Sheila being alive inside WHF.

A reason why Sheila would decide to stay alive until the police entered WHF nearly 4 hours later, has never been given.

[nugnug]

but why does he say it at all if was trying to frame his sister.

[Jane]

I thought a figure was mistakedly seen. Not sure how anyone can determine if it was a man or woman.

Anyway, it was determined as a trick of the light.

It probably -at the time- ran along the lines of

 Jeremy. "What was that?"

 Police. "What? Where?"

 Jeremy. "In the bedroom. I think I saw something! Look! There it is again!!  Can you see it?"

 Police. "I can't be certain. Maybe it's a trick of light?"

 Jeremy. "No, no! It could be someone moving"

 Police. "Maybe you thought you saw something but there's nothing there now"

By the time it came to relaying it, no one could recall who said what. There had been a conversation but nothing concrete was established.

[Adam]

but why does he say it at all if was trying to frame his sister.

Show me the source that he said he saw a man in the window.

Not that it matters. As he just wanted to give the police the impression there was someone inside.

[nugnug]

Show me the source that he said he saw a man in the window.

Not that it matters. As he just wanted to give the police the impression there was someone inside.

but why say a man when your trying to frame a woman.

[nugnug]

If you read his own letters, he didn't actually see anybody.

that's what he says now because he probely belives it was a trick of the light.

[Jane]

but why say a man when your trying to frame a woman.

He'd have needed very clear sight to say whether it was a male or female. It HIS sight had been that clear it would have been obvious to others it wasn't just a trick of light.

[Adam]

but why say a man when your trying to frame a woman.

Show me the source. Second request.

[guest2181]

that's what he says now because he probely belives it was a trick of the light.

Okay then.

[lookout]

It was an officer who'd described it as being the " figure of a male "-------so it was repeated as being such.

[Adam]

It was an officer who'd described it as being the " figure of a male "-------so it was repeated as being such.

So Nugs's thread post was wrong. No wonder he didn't supply a source.

[Steve_uk]

It was an officer who'd described it as being the " figure of a male "-------so it was repeated as being such.

PC Myall I think, though I can't find any reference to it in CAL's book.