Personal Abuse of members here on the Red Forum

[Caroline]

That defeats the whole point of only telling someone with good reason to know. 

I do have good reason to know, given that you insist it is this person who is the cause of all the trouble!

[guest154]

Unfortunatley that place has just been brought to my attention.

ActualMat writes -

"He dislikes Holly. I think it's clear the intention was that he hoped people would think it was her who had apparently PM'd him, two birds with one stone."

You couldn't be further from the truth. The person in question has active accounts on both Blue and Red. Spends a lot of time here but seldom posts anything in the public threads. I am not the only one who gets PMs from this user. So it may be possible for some here to work out who this user is.

I did not wish to bring this up. But felt I had to in order to defend myself from someone's delusional ideas and accusations about me.

I am disappointed by the assumption you made. If you think I am that way inclined, then you have bought into way too much malicious gossip. 

Sorry, if I was wrong in thinking that it was Holly who you were hinting at. That's the issue when you hint someone from the red forum is sending you things, people start to guess who it could be.

I don't doubt someone was shit stirring and sending you links to old posts, nothing suprises me anymore.

[Adam]

David & Holly met quite recently. They didn't get on. Holly being a moderator on the Red Forum would have helped David decide to cancel his account.

However he rarely posted beforehand.  It would have been very frustrating for him, knowing he is only allowed to debate with guilters on there.

[David1819]

I do have good reason to know, given that you insist it is this person who is the cause of all the trouble!

Well if its going to result in more public commotion, I am not saying anything.

Whenever I substantiate/validate what I say here it only opens a can of worms. Ive realised Its not allways worth it just to refute what people think/say about me.

Were did I say this person is the "cause of all the trouble!"      If you want to know the cause of all trouble well thats easy. Its the dismal and half-baked culture of this fourm that been allowed to  flourish due to years of counterproductive moderation.

[Caroline]

Well if its going to result in more public commotion, I am not saying anything.

Whenever I substantiate/validate what I say here it only opens a can of worms. Ive realised Its not allways worth it just to refute what people think/say about me.

Were did I say this person is the "cause of all the trouble!"      If you want to know the cause of all trouble well thats easy. Its the dismal and half-baked culture of this fourm that been allowed to  flourish due to years of counterproductive moderation.

If someone is messaging you about MY old posts, then they are shit stirrers and they used you because they didn't have the balls to post them themselves. Such people should be outed! Of course you could just be making it up - why would you protect them when you have already hinted who they might be? There aren't many people who are members of both forums who are on regularly.

Not sure what you mean by you last point but the problem to me, is people not being able to accept that others have their own opinion and take it personally when it's the opposite of theirs!

[Adam]

David has been quoting 5 year old posts from Caroline & JaneJ since he changed stance himself. He will have no hesitation in doing it again.

So not sure how anyone is going to accept a mysterious poster is now feeding him information.

[maggie]

Well if its going to result in more public commotion, I am not saying anything.

Whenever I substantiate/validate what I say here it only opens a can of worms. Ive realised Its not allways worth it just to refute what people think/say about me.

Were did I say this person is the "cause of all the trouble!"      If you want to know the cause of all trouble well thats easy. Its the dismal and half-baked culture of this fourm that been allowed to  flourish due to years of counterproductive moderation.

Thanks David

[Caroline]

David has been quoting 5 year old posts from Caroline & JaneJ since he changed stance himself. He will have no hesitation in doing it again.

So not sure how anyone is going to accept a mysterious poster is now feeding him information.

I don't believe there is one.

[Adam]

I don't believe there is one.

Why an earth would David say another poster is passing on you're old posts on to him, if that was not happening ? 

It's not as if he hasn't been able to find you're old posts himself, since changing stance.

As David said, anyone who wants to know who it is, will need to PM him. He will then decide whether to release the information.

[nugnug]

well im totally confused now.

whats the big deal someone passing david carlins old posts i mean there in the public domain he could of found them himslf if he had wanted to.

[Caroline]

well im totally confused now.

whats the big deal someone passing david carlins old posts i mean there in the public domain he could of found them himslf if he had wanted to.

And did.

[Adam]

well im totally confused now.

whats the big deal someone passing david carlins old posts i mean there in the public domain he could of found them himslf if he had wanted to.

It's surprising Nugs.

A poster suddenly decides to look for another posters old posts.

Rather than quoting them him/herself, the poster passes the old posts onto David, via PM. Although David can find and regulary quotes 5 year old posts of other posters.

David stated on the forum he is being passed this information. But won't say by who.  Similar to saying he has a 'Forensic Evidence Breakthrough' & then not saying what is is.

Guess everyone will have to PM David. As he said, he will then decide whether you are worthy of disclosure.

[lookout]

Sorry to disappoint, pugwash, but this " old boiler " is off to Australia and not a garden centre or charity shop in sight, so carry on guessing about my life and give those snotty smelly consumptive dogs a bath instead and wash your mouth out while you're at it-------in the same water !

[Steve_uk]

Sorry to disappoint, pugwash, but this " old boiler " is off to Australia and not a garden centre or charity shop in sight, so carry on guessing about my life and give those snotty smelly consumptive dogs a bath instead and wash your mouth out while you're at it-------in the same water !

I hope you enjoy your trip lookout and can find some rest and relaxation.

[IndigoJ]

Sorry to disappoint, pugwash, but this " old boiler " is off to Australia and not a garden centre or charity shop in sight, so carry on guessing about my life and give those snotty smelly consumptive dogs a bath instead and wash your mouth out while you're at it-------in the same water !

Enjoy your trip!