Bullets fired and reloading

[Roch]

about a week after the muders

You are certain it wasn't adjourned?

[Caroline]

You are certain it wasn't adjourned?

Positive

[Caroline]

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/past-crimes-the-bamber-files-2046383.html

[lookout]

He may as well have said he did it after leaving the silencer in the cupboard to be found.

[Roch]

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/past-crimes-the-bamber-files-2046383.html

Cant spot anything about inquest but my eyes are tired

[Stephanie]

Cant spot anything about inquest but my eyes are tired

could be why you've seen things most of us haven't re the photos

Could be time for a visit to the optician

[David1819]

NO... I have not been shown the original PM report.  I have had sight of handwritten notes, which came via the CT to this forum.  I do not know whether the notes are complete.  They are not dated.  The only other thing I have seen is a statement dated within the case stewardship of Ainsley.  All statements were vetted by Ainsley... for the purpose of PROSECUTING.

Those notes are the original autopsy examination. If you look at the later typed out version you can tell Vanezis has reffered to these notes and simply typed them out. You can tell they are complete because they are in same format as the typed version. It begins with "Well nourished female 6ft 9" and ends with conclusion "death by multiple gunshot wounds"

[Caroline]

Cant spot anything about inquest but my eyes are tired

8th paragraph

[Roch]

8th paragraph

Good spot but I'm still not certain.

[Roch]

could be why you've seen things most of us haven't re the photos

Could be time for a visit to the optician

Yes I must be imagining things.

[Caroline]

Good spot but I'm still not certain.

Well, can't help you with that I'm afraid - it's a fact you can easily check out.

[Roch]

Well, can't help you with that I'm afraid - it's a fact you can easily check out.

But where?

[Roch]

CAL reckons adjouned.

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=zV3WCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA236&lpg=PA236&dq=deputy+coroner+tompkin+caffell&source=bl&ots=jQz_J4EevY&sig=LU-UYjb4CCeVhq0BCf7QgNZJbeM&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjw-u7PgPbWAhUCvRoKHXDLBU4Q6AEIJjAA#v=onepage&q=deputy%20coroner%20tompkin%20caffell&f=false

[Caroline]

CAL reckons adjouned.

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=zV3WCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA236&lpg=PA236&dq=deputy+coroner+tompkin+caffell&source=bl&ots=jQz_J4EevY&sig=LU-UYjb4CCeVhq0BCf7QgNZJbeM&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjw-u7PgPbWAhUCvRoKHXDLBU4Q6AEIJjAA#v=onepage&q=deputy%20coroner%20tompkin%20caffell&f=false

Wilkes also states the verdict was 4 murders and a suicide

As to where - try here http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/help-with-your-research/research-guides/coroners-inquests/

[Roch]

Wilkes also states the verdict was 4 murders and a suicide

As to where - try here http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/help-with-your-research/research-guides/coroners-inquests/

If the coroner adjourned it for two months - how could they have reached a verdict?   I tried contacting the HM coroners office directly about the original findings of the pathologist.  They basically told me to go away.  They've probably had many similar enquiries over the years.