It spurts/falls downwards from the neck and then onto her dress and arm. Before she hits the ground.
Spurting blood cannot break the skin. Nor can it explain the wounds on the back of her hand which are gouge / scrape marks made by a fingernail. I've already explained this to you on numerous occasions. She has marks on her upper arm (bloodied cuts) completely independent from any run or smear nearby. How likely is it that a victim has cuts on her upper up and hand - but the rest of the blood on her arm is merely formed by spurts / runs? If you insist on holding with your position - you will at some point have to concede that Sheila Caffell's skin was broken in several places from her upper arm down to her hand - but the runs on her arm are from the spurting neck wound. You will then be saying that although you believe the runs on her arm are from the spurting neck wound, she must still have been in a fight / scuffle in order to have obtained the other areas of broken skin.
Furthermore - her earring was ripped from here ear and her necklace / pendant was yanked from behind in the struggle. June has shin kick / cuts right leg. On left leg she has curved cuts. She also has a gashed chin, possibly from a thumbnail.
The area of Sheila's hand where the blood is supposed to have transferred to the runs on her wrist, hardly has any blood on it. It's more like smudged blood and has a thin cut and a couple of nick marks (literally the skin is broken).