Sheila showering & changing after the 4x massacre & before the police arrived:

[guest2181]

I was referring to her stomach contents. Of which there wouldn't have been had she have eaten at the same time as the others.

I think that's a bit of a leap. They all would have had something in their stomachs. The absence of it being reported isn't evidence of its absence.

[Jane]

I think that's a bit of a leap. They all would have had something in their stomachs. The absence of it being reported isn't evidence of its absence.

Any more that there's any significance in Dr Craig only noting one gunshot wound to Sheila when he only noted one gunshot wound to the others.

[guest2181]

Is this not her foot?

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=887.0;attach=34137;image

There are some suggestions voiced on the forum, that it is not.

It was released by the CT as a propaganda piece, which attracts a certain amount of suspicion; given what they have claimed previously.

[Kaldin]

There are some suggestions voiced on the forum, that it is not.

It was released by the CT as a propaganda piece, which attracts a certain amount of suspicion; given what they have claimed previously.

Hmmm, interesting. Let me examine it further. There is certainly red nail varnish on the nails.

[Adam]

David won't answer tricky questions Adam because he hasn't yet figured it all out.

Sheila didn't shower. She was asleep when Bamber started shooting. Plus, on top of her existing meds that weakened her and made her drowsy, she was menstruating which any women knows drains the life out of you. She would have been totally knackered and weak.

She'd have most probably showered before she went to bed, then Bam! She wouldn't have known what hit her. At least I like to think she wouldn't. 

Hopefully David will answer on this thread. The massacre was 32 years ago. Lots of time to figure things out.

[lookout]

I think that's a bit of a leap. They all would have had something in their stomachs. The absence of it being reported isn't evidence of its absence.

Assuming that the family ate at 8pm,there would have been nothing in their stomachs next day,on examination------but there had been with Sheila,meaning that she'd have eaten much much later.
3 hours for food to leave the stomach in the normal digestive system.

[Stephanie]

And Adam, if Sheila had of been up all night running around the house, fighting with her father, chasing crispy etc.  Her tampon would not have remained in place.

I'm sure Lookout will confirm this. Sanitary wear back in the 80's wasn't like it is now a days.

[Stephanie]

I would have said that she had showered,leaving the shower room in disarray with the shower head broken off. Probably before eating her last snack I imagine.

What about her sanitary wear?

[Kaldin]

And Adam, if Sheila had of been up all night running around the house, fighting with her father, chasing crispy etc.  Her tampon would not have remained in place.

I'm sure Lookout will confirm this. Sanitary wear back in the 80's wasn't like it is now a days.

Of course it would have remained in place - it was designed to do so. Do you think women in the '80s never moved in case their tampon fell out?

[Stephanie]

I think it's unlikely that she had a shower. She might have washed her hands and her feet though. By the way, in the appeal document it says her feet had no blood on them - that's not true - at least one of them had blood on it.

You may not shower when you mentruate Kaldin but Sheila was by all accounts very particular about her appearance.

You can't keep judging this case on your own standards

[guest2181]

Assuming that the family ate at 8pm,there would have been nothing in their stomachs next day,on examination------but there had been with Sheila,meaning that she'd have eaten much much later.
3 hours for food to leave the stomach in the normal digestive system.

Assume makes an ass out of u and me.

Your 3 hour estimate is inaccurate.

[Kaldin]

You may not shower when you mentruate Kaldin but Sheila was by all accounts very particular about her appearance.

You can't keep judging this case on your own standards

Eh? I'm saying that it's unlikely she had a shower after the killings. Furthermore, she might have had one in the morning, not before she went to bed.

You are trolling this forum, and I don't think anything you say can be taken seriously any more.

[lookout]

And Adam, if Sheila had of been up all night running around the house, fighting with her father, chasing crispy etc.  Her tampon would not have remained in place.

I'm sure Lookout will confirm this. Sanitary wear back in the 80's wasn't like it is now a days.

It would have remained in situ. Women don't have any problems performing sports,so why should hurtling around like a dervish be any different ?
Not that this has to do with anything.

[Stephanie]

Of course it would have remained in place - it was designed to do so. Do you think women in the '80s never moved in case their tampon fell out?

Where's your proof for this?

What kind of tampon was it?

What time did she change her tampon?

They didn't have pearl tampons back in the 80's!!

Had the tampon leaked? The pathologist didn't state this in his evidence!

[Stephanie]

Assuming that the family ate at 8pm,there would have been nothing in their stomachs next day,on examination------but there had been with Sheila,meaning that she'd have eaten much much later.
3 hours for food to leave the stomach in the normal digestive system.

What about her tampon and iron levels?