0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Hmm? We're talking Essex 1985, NOT NCIS 2017.
A blind man on a galloping horse would see marks left by someone wearing gloves.( imprint of glove,fibres,sweat.) Gloves leave their own prints.
And gloves can be burned.
Well maybe one of them, as wasn't one found ? A bit careless,wasn't it ?
I have no idea. However, I seem to recall something about Marigolds? But the thought occurs to me that it's hardly likely to be the sort of thing that Sheila would have done.
Nor Jeremy either.
Sheila wasn't convicted of murder though, so clearly, it had nothing to do with her.
Had she still been alive she would-----while the balance of her mind was disturbed.
But she wasn't. She was murdered. Jeremy was convicted.
Okay,we'll see.
I believe he walked. I make a similar walk twice a day with my dog across the fields. He knew the area well and would be familiar with short cuts and access routes.
Based on Googles calculations on flat road during day light. It would take almost and hour and a half via the sea wall route. There are at leased 16 fields to pass. Some of them the size of Goldhanger. Claiming he walked only stretches Sheila's time of death even further making it even more impossible for him to have killed her.
Your timings are way out from PC Wilkinson's evidence: http://www.jeremy-bamber.co.uk/bicycle
I certainly don't think he used the bike and that RWB had rather a vivid imagination. There wouldn't be prints if he used gloves but there were bloody prints found on the aga tiles, it's in CAL's book (although they were probably Nevill's).
