Ignoring undisputed forensic evidence that Sheila did not fire a rifle:

[susan]

You agreed that Sheila did not have any forensic evidence on her showing she had fired a rifle 26 times, reloaded twice & fought a large man. 

You have said this was because Sheila changed and had a shower.

Since being shown that a shower would not remove evidence & Sheila could not shower/change if dead,  you have said "I will continue to say Sheila murdered her family and then killed herself".

Agreeing there is no evidence Sheila committed the massacre but continuing to accuse her of such a terrible crime is perverted.

 

Please confirm if you are going to change stance or support one of Mike's or Sherlock's third party suggestions.

Hello Adam I will not change my stance and I will not agree with Mike or Sherlock.  Sorry for being perverted but I cannot change my stance

[Steve_uk]

Hello Adam I will not change my stance and I will not agree with Mike or Sherlock.  Sorry for being perverted but I cannot change my stance

Susan I'm sure you're not perverted but you may be perverse.

[susan]

Susan I'm sure you're not perverted but you may be perverse.

Hello Steve but on the other hand I maybe right

[Adam]

Hello Adam I will not change my stance and I will not agree with Mike or Sherlock.  Sorry for being perverted but I cannot change my stance

Agreeing there is no forensic evidence on Sheila showing she committed the massacre. Then saying "I will continue to say Sheila murdered her family and then killed herself"  is supporting the real killer. Which is perverted.

But continue to pretend the evidence does not exist to accuse an innocent and murdered woman.

[susan]

Agreeing there is no forensic evidence on Sheila showing she committed the massacre. Then saying "I will continue to say Sheila murdered her family and then killed herself"  is supporting the real killer. Which is perverted.

But continue to accuse Sheila.

Adam thank you for your understanding.

[lookout]

Hello Adam I will not change my stance and I will not agree with Mike or Sherlock.  Sorry for being perverted but I cannot change my stance

Mrs Malaprop.

[susan]

Mrs Malaprop.

Hi Lookout who is she bet she is a lovely woman who has the gift of "second sight" hehehe that is one thing Adam don't have in his Library

[lookout]

Hi Lookout who is she bet she is a lovely woman who has the gift of "second sight" hehehe that is one thing Adam don't have in his Library

Mrs Malaprop----incorrect words with similar sounds but different meanings.Short for Malapropism.

Example-----A very " extinguished " gentleman. ( should be distinguished ) 

Makes me laugh. Hylda Baker used to use them in her sketches.

[mike tesko]

David Sheila didn't fire a weapon. She did, and police believed she did, and had!

To be fair I don't believe you've ever tried to negate the evidence by claiming Sheila had a shower & changed.  Unlike Susan you probably knew that wouldn't work. 

I've no idea whose undamaged, clean & unbloodied foot that is. it's Sheila's foot! Although it is a lot brighter than the other one you posted. difference is down to settings at the exposure stage of the negatives..