Kitchen telephone

[mike tesko]

The status of the 3.26am call to police (see Bonnett C6 log) altered early morning from an exchange line call, to a 999 call whilst Jeremy was in the company of PS Saxby. Now, please, explain to me in simple English how could this be true, if Jeremy had already killed everyone, including his dad, and his sister? Who the fuck tapped the cradle of the phone inside the farmhouse and dialled '999'?

[mike tesko]

The status of the 3.26am call to police (see Bonnett C6 log) altered early morning from an exchange line call, to a 999 call whilst Jeremy was in the company of PS Saxby. Now, please, explain to me in simple English how could this be true, if Jeremy had already killed everyone, including his dad, and his sister? Who the fuck tapped the cradle of the phone inside the farmhouse and dialled '999'?

 This reminds me, of the case against me, at Barnsley Magistrates court by the despicable South Yorkshire Police, and the local CPS who prosecuted me, when two police officers (The despicable DC Caulfield, and the equally despicably DS Shepherd) claimed to have been inside an observation van at 5.20pm on Wednesday, 22nd January, 1986, and they falsely and maliciously claimed they had seen me driving a stolen vehicle which they both falsely claimed had pulled up outside some target premises they were supposed to have been keeping an eye on for whatever reason - the fukking van they were supposed to have been inside at 5.20pm, was still parked up in the fukking police compound according to a detective police Inspector, until 5.55pm and was not actually parked up in the street outside the aforementioned target premises until 6.30pm. One of these criminals in uniform was later promoted to the rank of DCI...

So, please don't try to lecture me about police dishonesty and criminality...

[mike tesko]

So, now we know with absolute proof, the guilters are hiding, because they know Essex police under the leadership of that criminal in uniform, DCS Mick Ainsley, knew full well that the status of the so called 3.26am call changed from it being an exchange line call, into a 999 call, whilst Jeremy was outside the farmhouse in the company of PS Saxby in CA07 which was parked up hundreds of feet away, outside the premises!

Who made the 999 call?

The dog...

[mike tesko]

So, now we know with absolute proof, the guilters are hiding, because they know Essex police under the leadership of that criminal in uniform, DCS Mick Ainsley, knew full well that the status of the so called 3.26am call changed from it being an exchange line call, into a 999 call, whilst Jeremy was outside the farmhouse in the company of PS Saxby in CA07 which was parked up hundreds of feet away, outside the premises!

Who made the 999 call?

The dog...

It makes me fukking angry, that so called decent members of the public, support this kind of dishonesty and corruption...

[mike tesko]

I doubt that many of you reading this can ever begin to imagine the toll it takes on an individual (lets say, such as all the victims of miscarriages of justice, including myself), who knows with 100% certainty that what is being spoken about them / me, is nothing but speculation and damn right lies...

[mike tesko]

I am telling the lot of you, that the status of the 3.26am call altered from it being an exchange line call, into a 999 call, whilst Jeremy was in the company of PS Saxby in his patrol car that was parked up in Pages Lane, now please how could Jeremy Bamber have had a hand in that?

He can't have............................................................................................

[mike tesko]

When is everyone suddenly going to wake up to reality?

The operator couldn't transfer the exchange line from whf after it became engaged by way of the 999 call system - the call had to be a 999 call in the first instance before that could be done, but as we have seen it started off as an exchange line call!!!

[mike tesko]

Please, all of you do your own research to confirm what I am saying...

An innocent mans liberty is resting upon your judgement!

[mike tesko]

Just remember this (if you are brainwashed by Essex police and the local CPS bullshit), the 3.26am call to police started off as an exchange line call (3,26am), and became transformed into a 999 call, which did not get terminated by the cops until 7.47am...

Can, any of you understand the significance of this, sorry for saying this, but are you really that thick?

[mike tesko]

Essex police do not stand alone in being accused of framing an innocent person for crimes they could not have committed, all the forces are at the same game, it depends from the outset on the mindset of the investigating force, they can paraphrase a witnesses statement to suite the case they are bringing! I believe that the CPS should be prosecuted for perjury when they persue a dishonest case!

[mike tesko]

Essex police do not stand alone in being accused of framing an innocent person for crimes they could not have committed, all the forces are at the same game, it depends from the outset on the mindset of the investigating force, they can paraphrase a witnesses statement to suite the case they are bringing! I believe that the CPS should be prosecuted for perjury when they persue a dishonest case!

The persons who needs to be prosecuted, are the Director of Public Prosecutions, and the Chief Constable of whichever force is bringing the false prosecution, so that they can be potentially found guilty of bringing a false prosecution - let the vile evil monsters be prosecuted and convicted and if applicable, be sentenced to lengthy terms of imprisonment......

They are no better than us...

[Reader]

the status of the 3.26am call altered from it being an exchange line call, into a 999 call, . . . how could Jeremy Bamber have had a hand in that?

The documented 3:26am call was from Pc West to Malcolm Bonnett at the police HQ. The police later asked to monitor the WHF line, but its status wasn't changed until after the monitoring ended, and the police didn't suggest Jeremy had a hand in changing its status.

[mike tesko]

The 3.26am call to Malcom Bonnett from PC West was via an exchange line, not a 999 call! It is not known whether the reference to the 'exchange line' is to the fact that Neville Bambers call to PC West was by way of the exchange line call, or if PC West told Malcom Bonnett that, otherwise Neville's call was by way of a 999 call, and Bonnett recorded the fact that PC West contacted him by way on the exchange line?

What we do know, is that from the offset by 3.42am and 3.56am, the phone at the farm was off the hook, but It became engaged (5.47am), and then at 6.08am  the operator was asked to switch the phone at the farm to the police using the 999 system. The phone status at the farm did change, from being off the hook, to becoming engaged, and then the operator was asked to switch the phone at the farm to the police using the 999 system...

[Reader]

There is nothing to suggest that Nevill made a 999 call. Pc West got the engaged tone when he tried to call WHF, which was consistent with what Jeremy had told him. The BT operator informed Pc West that the reason for the engaged tone was that the receiver was off-hook (as distinct from the line being in use for a call at the time of the check). The wording used in logs to refer to the status of the line may have varied, but that doesn't imply that the line's status had changed. The line didn't "become engaged" at 5:47am - it was engaged and simply off-hook until the BT operator connected it to police HQ.

. . .  the operator was asked to switch the phone at the farm to the police using the 999 system.

The operator wasn't asked to "switch" the line, just to connect it to the police HQ. She might have been asked to do that using the 999 system, but she wasn't allowed to do that, so she used a normal exchange line.

[mike tesko]

There is nothing to suggest that Nevill made a 999 call. I disagree, because the operator could not patch through an exchange line call from whf in that era, because of the old type of exchange system, the only way the operator could patch the line through from the farmhouse to the police using the 999 system, was if Nevilles call (or at least one of them) had in fact been a 999 call! I was told this by telephone engineers whilst I was operating as Bambers McKensie man! Pc West got the engaged tone when he tried to call WHF, which was consistent with what Jeremy had told him. PC West may have used a second line to try to make that call, hence why he would get an engaged tone! Failing that, Nevilles 3.26am call may not have changed into a 999 staus until much later in the early hours of the morning! The BT operator informed Pc West that the reason for the engaged tone was that the receiver was off-hook (as distinct from the line being in use for a call at the time of the check). Sorry, the operator reported she could hear a dog barking when she reported the phone at the farm being off the hook, this is a totally different status of the phone which she later referred to now being engaged! If she had previously reported hearing the dog barking when the phone was off the hook, why would it suddenly become engaged at 5.47am? Something dramatic occurred here at this stage, and I believe it involved someone inside the farmhouse making a 999 call!The wording used in logs to refer to the status of the line may have varied, But only if the status of the phone changed, or altered! but that doesn't imply that the line's status had changed. It changed in accordance with the circumstances described here by me..The line didn't "become engaged" at 5:47am it did as distinct from the phone being off the hook and the operator being able to hear the dog barking previously...- it was engaged No, it wasn't the operator could hear a dog barking originally when she reported the phone inside the farmhouse being off the hook, but by 5.47am she did not report hearing anything, she simply reported that the phone was engaged!and simply off-hook no, it had become engaged.. until the BT operator connected it to police HQ. Sorry, no - the status of the phone at the farm altered at 5.47am, from being off the hook, to being engaged!
The operator wasn't asked to "switch" the line, Oh, but she was at 6.08am...just to connect it to the police HQ. She might have been asked to do that using the 999 system, but she wasn't allowed to do that, so she used a normal exchange line.It states that she was asked to switch the line from the farmhouse using the 999 system, that was possible because at the time (5.47am) the status of the telephone changed from being off the hook (3.42am) to it becoming engaged (5.47am) somebody inside the farmhouse made a 999 emergency call requesting ambulances!!