Author Topic: Kitchen telephone  (Read 52311 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #210 on: May 30, 2017, 02:54:PM »
It was something I was told by a BT engineer several years ago, something so basic in its execution, that it beggars belief that no-one (until now) has realised the significance of it...

Please, bear with me, have a look at this..............
Malcom Bonnetts C6 form states that the time the message was received was at 3.26am,
 and PC Wests C1 form states that the time the information was received was at 3.36am...


The contents of both the C6 and the C1 forms cannot have been received at one and the same time!

These facts are irrefutable evidence,both documents clearly state that the recorded times (3.26am, and 3.36am) are the times the information was received by Bonnet, and by West...
« Last Edit: May 30, 2017, 03:13:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #211 on: May 30, 2017, 03:14:PM »
But wait, there is more...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #212 on: May 30, 2017, 03:16:PM »
But wait, there is more...

The information which I received several years ago whilst acting in the capacity of Jeremys McKensie man, was that the operator could not patch through an exchange line call to either the incident room, or the control room, only that the operator could patch through to the aforementioned if the original call had been a '999' call...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #213 on: May 30, 2017, 03:19:PM »
Now, there came a moment in the police operation that morning, as I understand it, that when the operator was asked by police to again check the telephone line at whf, that instead of saying that she could hear the dogs barking, or for that matter any screaming or yelling or gasping by any victim or perpetrator, the operator simply reported that...

'THE PHONE WAS ENGAGED'...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #214 on: May 30, 2017, 03:21:PM »
Now, there came a moment in the police operation that morning, as I understand it, that when the operator was asked by police to again check the telephone line at whf, that instead of saying that she could hear the dogs barking, or for that matter any screaming or yelling or gasping by any victim or perpetrator, the operator simply reported that...

'THE PHONE WAS ENGAGED'...

Why had the phone suddenly changed in status, from being off the hook,(as checked by the operator)to becoming engaged?
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #215 on: May 30, 2017, 03:23:PM »
Please, if you don't mind, do your own research into the point at which the telephone line suddenly became engaged, and whilst you are doing this, also pinpoint the exact moment when the operator patched through the line using the 999 system...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #216 on: May 30, 2017, 03:26:PM »
Please, if you don't mind, do your own research into the point at which the telephone line suddenly became engaged, and whilst you are doing this, also pinpoint the exact moment when the operator patched through the line using the 999 system...

You see, I was reliably informed several years ago by a BT engineer, that an operator could not patch through an exchange line call , via the type of exchanges in operation in that vicinity to the police, unless it was a 999 call...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #217 on: May 30, 2017, 03:27:PM »
And so...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #218 on: May 30, 2017, 03:29:PM »
And so...

What I now believe to be true, based upon the reliable information I received, is that the status of the 3.26am call altered from it being an 'exchange line call' at 3.26am, into a 999 call at ...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #219 on: May 30, 2017, 03:29:PM »
Excuse me, are you all paying attention?
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #220 on: May 30, 2017, 03:32:PM »
Please, pay attention - Jeremy only ever made an exchange line call to the police (3.36am, commenced),If any of you mother fukkers know anything different then please, respectfully please put me right!
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #221 on: May 30, 2017, 03:35:PM »
I am a victim of police dishonesty, and violence, and corruption, therefore I have personal experience of the lengths these criminals in uniform are prepared to go to, and will go to, to try and justify the mindset these criminals have when it comes to this potential prosecution or that potential prosecution...
« Last Edit: May 30, 2017, 03:36:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #222 on: May 30, 2017, 03:38:PM »
I am a victim of police dishonesty, and violence, and corruption, therefore I have personal experience of the lengths these criminals in uniform are prepared to go to, and will go to, to try and justify the mindset these criminals have when it comes to this potential prosecution or that potential prosecution...

 I wish some of you non believers would stand back from wholeheartedly supporting every lie these criminals in uniform are capable of telling, and in certain circumstances they are prepared and do to tell...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #223 on: May 30, 2017, 03:40:PM »
You see, I have it on good authority that the phone call from whf which was received at 3.26am, mysteriously changed, and became altered into a 999 call, whilst Jeremy Bamber was in Pages Lane in the company of PS Saxby!
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #224 on: May 30, 2017, 03:41:PM »
You see, I have it on good authority that the phone call from whf which was received at 3.26am, mysteriously changed, and became altered into a 999 call, whilst Jeremy Bamber was in Pages Lane in the company of PS Saxby!

Now, you mother fukkers, if this is true, how the fuk does that make my old friend Jeremy Bamber a fukking murderer?
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...