Author Topic: Kitchen telephone  (Read 52367 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #75 on: May 27, 2017, 03:49:PM »
Hi Roch that is very sad as I did engage posting with Bill and found him to be very interesting and I looked forward to him returning and I am ashamed of myself that to a certain extent I joined in with Justice over the toilet and on reflection I was totally out of order when a poster is trying to get a serious debate going it is so out of order to turn the whole post into a joke and I am seriously very upset with myself for stooping to that level and I feel like never posting again as it is so difficult to do right for doing wrong on the forum it is not as it use to be a good place to be. :( >:(  In the future I will never get involved again in disrespectful posting never been in to it anyway.

Susan
You do it a lot and I am here because as I always believed and now know  Jeremy is innocent

It's not a joking matter when an innocent man has been locked up for over 30 years

You can always go on the wide awake club
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #76 on: May 27, 2017, 03:50:PM »
Susan, I'm pretty confident that the membership is aware of who the regular offenders are. Those members who have developed a cocky arrogance and are wind-up merchants.  You're not one of them.

Hi Roch cocky arrogance is not part of my nature I think my problem is I want to please everyone and that does not work on forums works off the forum.  I was out of order yesterday and I regret very much getting carried away Justice is my friend and such a nice person he would never try to disrupt the forum he likes a laugh. 

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #77 on: May 27, 2017, 03:52:PM »
Exactly Hartley, i only used the toilet as an example, ok it bought a bit of humour but nothing untold or out of order, poor Susan must feel deflated by this and not want to post anymore.  You just don't know what to say or do in case you upset someone, I mean I've lost £100 on Bill telling us to put money on Bamber being released, but I had him in a round Robin, with Hartlepool and Chesterfield, all three let me down >:(

Your a laugh a minute, try discussing the case
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

guest2181

  • Guest
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #78 on: May 27, 2017, 03:53:PM »
Your a laugh a minute, try discussing the case

Advice you could offer yourself perhaps?

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #79 on: May 27, 2017, 03:54:PM »
Susan
You do it a lot and I am here because as I always believed and now know  Jeremy is innocent

It's not a joking matter when an innocent man has been locked up for over 30 years

You can always go on the wide awake club

Jackie I know I do and I have offered my sincere apologies I can do no more. It has never been my intention to offend I have done it not thinking but I am now going to be more careful sometimes I have been like that as the forum was getting heated and I was trying to change the mood as I said sometimes it is difficult to do right for doing wrong.  Sorry.

guest7363

  • Guest
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #80 on: May 27, 2017, 03:55:PM »
Your a laugh a minute, try discussing the case
Oh Bless thanks Jackie, hugs and kisses

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #81 on: May 27, 2017, 03:55:PM »
Hi Justice Roch is not trying to make me feel guilty he is my friend.  Last night when I signed off I did feel within myself that I had been too silly and flippant and I was even worried that I had given that impression to Roch who I have a very high regard for.  I know you and I know you would not be disrespectful on purpose but sometimes we human beings get carried away and forget where it all came from.  I will carry on posting and Roch is not in the habit of swearing he was just pushed to the limit yesterday what people forget it is a different scenario when it is 4 posters to 1 I know it is not meant but it comes over as ganging up and taking the mickey.  We all learn from our mistakes and I will behave myself a bit better from now on and I do hope Bill comes back as I think he has so much to offer and may share with us.Justice this post is not in anyway a criticism of any forum members as I think they are a good lot and nice people.

Susan the people who believe Jeremy is guilty are outnumbered that's why they behave how they do and then when they have there posts removed they sulk

Things are looking up
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #82 on: May 27, 2017, 03:56:PM »
Oh Bless thanks Jackie, hugs and kisses

Glad to help
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17579
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #83 on: May 27, 2017, 03:56:PM »
I'm a bit bored of talking about Roch to be honest, he can have a wobbly and throw his dummy out of his pram as often as he likes.

Nobody was ganging up on anybody. Everybody (including Roch) offered an opinion that the quote was somewhat ambiguous and could be read in a number of different ways.

Roch's outburst and rudeness continues to be a mystery. If Bill has stopped posting then maybe Roch's antics are to blame.

It seems unlikely that Bill would ask a question and then be upset when he received replies.  :-\

I may have spat my dummy out - but I'm not cocky, arrogant, rude and disrespectful to serious posters giving their time and research on here. Or even posting on here. You and your cabal are.  It's preventing the forum from progressing. 

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #84 on: May 27, 2017, 03:58:PM »
I'm a bit bored of talking about Roch to be honest, he can have a wobbly and throw his dummy out of his pram as often as he likes.

Nobody was ganging up on anybody. Everybody (including Roch) offered an opinion that the quote was somewhat ambiguous and could be read in a number of different ways.

Roch's outburst and rudeness continues to be a mystery. If Bill has stopped posting then maybe Roch's antics are to blame.

It seems unlikely that Bill would ask a question and then be upset when he received replies.  :-\
You get bored a lot don't you. Maybe you need a change of direction?
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #85 on: May 27, 2017, 04:01:PM »
Advice you could offer yourself perhaps?

I'm absolutely fine, I'm not here trying to protect someone's interest

I'm here for the truth
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

guest2181

  • Guest
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #86 on: May 27, 2017, 04:01:PM »
I may have spat my dummy out - but I'm not cocky, arrogant, rude and disrespectful to serious posters giving their time and research on here. Or even posting on here. You and your cabal are.  It's preventing the forum from progressing.

Rubbish Roch.

Bill posted a question.

He was asked where his information came from as it could be read a number of ways and the context was important in deciphering a meaning.

Exactly what is it that has vexed you so?

I do think you are rude, I'm not sure what you mean by cabal and I don't belive I am stopping the forum from progressing. How could I possibly do that even if I wanted to (which I don't). In fact don't actually know what stopping the forum progressing actually means.

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #87 on: May 27, 2017, 04:02:PM »
Jackie I know I do and I have offered my sincere apologies I can do no more. It has never been my intention to offend I have done it not thinking but I am now going to be more careful sometimes I have been like that as the forum was getting heated and I was trying to change the mood as I said sometimes it is difficult to do right for doing wrong.  Sorry.

I know, I will be gutted if Bill stops posting
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

guest2181

  • Guest
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #88 on: May 27, 2017, 04:03:PM »
Rubbish Roch.

Bill posted a question.

He was asked where his information came from as it could be read a number of ways and the context was important in deciphering a meaning.

Exactly what is it that has vexed you so?

I do think you are rude, I'm not sure what you mean by cabal and I don't belive I am stopping the forum from progressing. How could I possibly do that even if I wanted to (which I don't). In fact don't actually know what stopping the forum progressing actually means.

Seriously Roch, what was the problem?

I am at a complete loss, please elucidate me.

guest7363

  • Guest
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #89 on: May 27, 2017, 04:06:PM »
I know, I will be gutted if Bill stops posting
I won't, I lost bloody £100 quid listening to him, bloody Bamber out this year