Author Topic: Kitchen telephone  (Read 52420 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17579
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #60 on: May 27, 2017, 03:11:PM »
Adam think about it if these people have information that could help to free Jeremy they will have to give it to his Legal team and not make it public until they are told they can do so

I'm not involved in gathering or investigating evidence that will free Jeremy. So I think Adam could be barking up the wrong tree at times. I did express a while ago that I have witnessed some evidence which immediately made me realise that Sheila was involved with the killings. I mean it was impossible to deny the fact, after I witnessed what I saw.  But I personally have no evidence to pass on to legal etc. Or for that mater, AH.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44293
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #61 on: May 27, 2017, 03:12:PM »
Adam think about it if these people have information that could help to free Jeremy they will have to give it to his Legal team and not make it public until they are told they can do so

I bet you are feeling left out.

It seems all supporters on here have classified information that shows Bamber is innocent. What a pity none of it can be released until Bamber is free.
« Last Edit: May 27, 2017, 03:15:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17579
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #62 on: May 27, 2017, 03:13:PM »
Hi Roch that is very sad as I did engage posting with Bill and found him to be very interesting and I looked forward to him returning and I am ashamed of myself that to a certain extent I joined in with Justice over the toilet and on reflection I was totally out of order when a poster is trying to get a serious debate going it is so out of order to turn the whole post into a joke and I am seriously very upset with myself for stooping to that level and I feel like never posting again as it is so difficult to do right for doing wrong on the forum it is not as it use to be a good place to be. :( >:(  In the future I will never get involved again in disrespectful posting never been in to it anyway.

Hi Susan, I'm quite sure you are 'in the clear'. So don't worry about it.

And furthermore, I'm sorry to drag the thread further off topic. I think this is also a recurring bugbear for some posters. I think Tom G alluded to it recently.
« Last Edit: May 27, 2017, 03:14:PM by Roch »

guest7363

  • Guest
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #63 on: May 27, 2017, 03:18:PM »
Hi Roch that is very sad as I did engage posting with Bill and found him to be very interesting and I looked forward to him returning and I am ashamed of myself that to a certain extent I joined in with Justice over the toilet and on reflection I was totally out of order when a poster is trying to get a serious debate going it is so out of order to turn the whole post into a joke and I am seriously very upset with myself for stooping to that level and I feel like never posting again as it is so difficult to do right for doing wrong on the forum it is not as it use to be a good place to be. :( >:(  In the future I will never get involved again in disrespectful posting never been in to it anyway.
Well said Susan, I don't know how some of you ladies stay on here at times, I supposed talking about toilets is better than being told to f""k off all the time, don't feel guilty Susan you did nothing wrong to what some posters are trying to make you feel guilty for, it's an easy cop out to put the blame on others, there was nothing in the toilet issue other than phrasing, so carry on posting Susan.

guest2181

  • Guest
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #64 on: May 27, 2017, 03:22:PM »
Well said Susan, I don't know how some of you ladies stay on here at times, I supposed talking about toilets is better than being told to f""k off all the time, don't feel guilty Susan you did nothing wrong to what some posters are trying to make you feel guilty for, it's an easy cop out to put the blame on others, there was nothing in the toilet issue other than phrasing, so carry on posting Susan.

What posters really could have done is responded to Bills post and ask him where his information came from so that it could be better understood.

Oh wait ............ as that's precisely what I did, maybe that won't count?  :-\

guest2181

  • Guest
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #65 on: May 27, 2017, 03:28:PM »
What posters really could have done is responded to Bills post and ask him where his information came from so that it could be better understood.

Oh wait ............ as that's precisely what I did, maybe that won't count?  :-\

Indeed so did you Justice.

guest7363

  • Guest
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #66 on: May 27, 2017, 03:28:PM »
What posters really could have done is responded to Bills post and ask him where his information came from so that it could be better understood.

Oh wait ............ as that's precisely what I did, maybe that won't count?  :-\
Exactly Hartley, i only used the toilet as an example, ok it bought a bit of humour but nothing untold or out of order, poor Susan must feel deflated by this and not want to post anymore.  You just don't know what to say or do in case you upset someone, I mean I've lost £100 on Bill telling us to put money on Bamber being released, but I had him in a round Robin, with Hartlepool and Chesterfield, all three let me down >:(

guest2181

  • Guest
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #67 on: May 27, 2017, 03:30:PM »
Exactly Hartley, i only used the toilet as an example, ok it bought a bit of humour but nothing untold or out of order, poor Susan must feel deflated by this and not want to post anymore.  You just don't know what to say or do in case you upset someone, I mean I've lost £100 on Bill telling us to put money on Bamber being released, but I had him in a round Robin, with Hartlepool and Chesterfield, all three let me down >:(

Well, more fool you.  ;D

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #68 on: May 27, 2017, 03:32:PM »
Well said Susan, I don't know how some of you ladies stay on here at times, I supposed talking about toilets is better than being told to f""k off all the time, don't feel guilty Susan you did nothing wrong to what some posters are trying to make you feel guilty for, it's an easy cop out to put the blame on others, there was nothing in the toilet issue other than phrasing, so carry on posting Susan.

Hi Justice Roch is not trying to make me feel guilty he is my friend.  Last night when I signed off I did feel within myself that I had been too silly and flippant and I was even worried that I had given that impression to Roch who I have a very high regard for.  I know you and I know you would not be disrespectful on purpose but sometimes we human beings get carried away and forget where it all came from.  I will carry on posting and Roch is not in the habit of swearing he was just pushed to the limit yesterday what people forget it is a different scenario when it is 4 posters to 1 I know it is not meant but it comes over as ganging up and taking the mickey.  We all learn from our mistakes and I will behave myself a bit better from now on and I do hope Bill comes back as I think he has so much to offer and may share with us.Justice this post is not in anyway a criticism of any forum members as I think they are a good lot and nice people.

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #69 on: May 27, 2017, 03:35:PM »
Have removed more posts from this thread.  Some of the posts I removed were not abusive but were way off topic.
I believe Bill's thread is an interesting subject for debate so tried to keep the essence of it on track.

Thank you Maggie
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

guest7363

  • Guest
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #70 on: May 27, 2017, 03:39:PM »
Hi Justice Roch is not trying to make me feel guilty he is my friend.  Last night when I signed off I did feel within myself that I had been too silly and flippant and I was even worried that I had given that impression to Roch who I have a very high regard for.  I know you and I know you would not be disrespectful on purpose but sometimes we human beings get carried away and forget where it all came from.  I will carry on posting and Roch is not in the habit of swearing he was just pushed to the limit yesterday what people forget it is a different scenario when it is 4 posters to 1 I know it is not meant but it comes over as ganging up and taking the mickey.  We all learn from our mistakes and I will behave myself a bit better from now on and I do hope Bill comes back as I think he has so much to offer and may share with us.Justice this post is not in anyway a criticism of any forum members as I think they are a good lot and nice people.
Your being very hard on yourself Susan.

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #71 on: May 27, 2017, 03:41:PM »
It's hard to be patient when Mike, David, Roch, JackieD & Bill say on the forum they have information that suggests Bamber is innocent.

But then won't say what it is.

But I will try.

Well my information is directly from a senior police officer so you can forget me posting it up here but he is writing a book if that helps Adam

You obviously believe what the police has to say so this should be an interesting read for you
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17579
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #72 on: May 27, 2017, 03:42:PM »
Susan, I'm pretty confident that the membership is aware of who the regular offenders are. Those members who have developed a cocky arrogance and are wind-up merchants.  You're not one of them.

guest2181

  • Guest
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #73 on: May 27, 2017, 03:43:PM »
Hi Justice Roch is not trying to make me feel guilty he is my friend.  Last night when I signed off I did feel within myself that I had been too silly and flippant and I was even worried that I had given that impression to Roch who I have a very high regard for.  I know you and I know you would not be disrespectful on purpose but sometimes we human beings get carried away and forget where it all came from.  I will carry on posting and Roch is not in the habit of swearing he was just pushed to the limit yesterday what people forget it is a different scenario when it is 4 posters to 1 I know it is not meant but it comes over as ganging up and taking the mickey.  We all learn from our mistakes and I will behave myself a bit better from now on and I do hope Bill comes back as I think he has so much to offer and may share with us.Justice this post is not in anyway a criticism of any forum members as I think they are a good lot and nice people.

I'm a bit bored of talking about Roch to be honest, he can have a wobbly and throw his dummy out of his pram as often as he likes.

Nobody was ganging up on anybody. Everybody (including Roch) offered an opinion that the quote was somewhat ambiguous and could be read in a number of different ways.

Roch's outburst and rudeness continues to be a mystery. If Bill has stopped posting then maybe Roch's antics are to blame.

It seems unlikely that Bill would ask a question and then be upset when he received replies.  :-\

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #74 on: May 27, 2017, 03:45:PM »
I could be wrong - but I doubt he will be back on the forum for quite a while - bearing in mind that he disengaged from posting on the forum previously, for approximately two years.  People should at least try to understand, that there are some interested parties out there who will only engage in the forum, if the forum is conducted along more serious lines, with some common courtesy. 

We can all engage in flippant remarks and condescension - but it doesn't suit every member or every situation.

The members of the forum have to decide whether they are prepared to sacrifice some of the over-familiar and cocky jibes, to attract or keep more posters who can genuinely add to the debate.

Roch
Just say it how it is, these people are just out to disrupt the forum
Fact
And they don't get away with it on other forums
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000