0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
It's funny how sources of quotes takes on an importance when it suits. I remember the allegation document from about six or seven years ago. It was extensively referenced. A fact which Hartley remained very aloof about. You cant have it both ways.
Is there a source for Bill's statement? I believe there was a lot of blood on the kitchen floor, of which there are no photographs, hence the possible confusion.
I believe Colin rang WHF on the morning of the murders and a policeman answered the phone. Thus a phone was handled by the police. I cannot remember where I read this or whether its true or not.
There's nothing about this in Colin's book. He was escorted to White House Farm almost immediately with Heather.
Page 56,57 it was Colins dad who rang WHF and police answered. (apparently)
Yes but they were at Bourtree Cottage, not the crime scene.
Does it say it was on the morning after the murders?
Have removed more posts from this thread. Some of the posts I removed were not abusive but were way off topic.I believe Bill's thread is an interesting subject for debate so tried to keep the essence of it on track.
6 August 2002 Stokenchurch investigation. Room 101 Trenchard House. DS 21 Stanley Jones speaking to DCI Jeannette McDiarmid about the kitchen telephone.Jones) “I can’t even see anybody using the phone in that kitchen, the state of it, do you know what I mean. There’s no way I want to use that phone”Every known photograph of the ivory coloured kitchen phone, including those on this website, shows the phone in pristine condition. What could Jones have meant by "the state of it"? Blood all over it?
This is all I have to go on.
Hi Bill, is this the information you referred to earlier?http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,7867.msg373230.html#msg373230http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,7867.msg373234.html#msg373234http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,7867.msg373240.html#msg373240. Is this the start of the information that will aquit Jeremy?
