Police V family

[Roch]

The avoidance of the wallet question is FACT - live with it!

He did fail to respond to the question.  Personally I felt his reasoning regarding this was to some extent understandable.  When he conceded that he had been flippant (in taking the line that it was an 'unimportant' question) and suggested that it had indeed been an important question from your perspective, I detect that was respecting you (as a person who had taken the time to write to him and shown an interest in the case).  He seemed contrite about the omission.

Either he is a liar or Ann Eaton is a liar.  If they are both liars then that makes it even more difficult to discern the truth.

[Caroline]

He did fail to respond to the question.  Personally I felt his reasoning regarding this was to some extent understandable.  When he conceded that he had been flippant (in taking the line that it was an 'unimportant' question) and suggested that it had indeed been an important question from your perspective, I detect that he did some respect to you as person who had taken the time to write to him and shown an interest in the case.  He seemed contrite about the omission.

Either he is a liar or Ann Eaton is a liar.  If they are both liars then that makes it even more diffuclt to discern the truth.

He only gave reasoning after 2 years - that I don't find understandable or reasonable - again, thanks for posting.

[Roch]

He only gave reasoning after 2 years - that I don't find understandable or reasonable - again, thanks for posting.

No problem.

[JackiePreece]

Caroline, Jane J, Susan, Maggie, Grahame, Alias, Harters/Hartley.

Alias changed to 'undecided' as she believes Bamber would have let Sheila live rather than shoot her twice.

Grahame left the forum saying he 'has to give in to his betters' before returning claiming the police framed Bamber.

I just cannot take you seriously Hartley is close to the family, Jane J, and Caroline
Maggie is Not 100% guilty and Justice
Can you count Adam add that up

[JackiePreece]

Adam
One thing that makes me happy is you are on the same side as Hartley, Caroline and Jane J.
As you seem to spend so much time on the case why don't you take a trip to the caravan park and meet everyone

[Adam]

I just cannot take you seriously Hartley is close to the family, Jane J, and Caroline
Maggie is Not 100% guilty and Justice
Can you count Adam add that up

It must be Harters. I always get them mixed up. I can't count, it's 7, not 6.

[Jan]

RWB was told about Sheila's prints being on the shell casings. Despite that he still tried to invent a way to explain it.

Were Sheila's prints on the casings ? If so surely it's game over ?

[Jane]

Were Sheila's prints on the casings ? If so surely it's game over ?

Surely, if it was intended to look as if Sheila was responsible it would have been sensible to make sure her prints were on the gun and things gun related.

[Jan]

Surely, if it was intended to look as if Sheila was responsible it would have been sensible to make sure her prints were on the gun and things gun related.

Oh so after the shooting he pressed the cases into her hands ? And then put them back where they fell but did not succeed it's the gun?

[Jane]

Oh so after the shooting he pressed the cases into her hands ? And then put them back where they fell but did not succeed it's the gun?

Why not? She was hardly going to stop him, was she, besides which, if she HAD been responsible for shooting her entire family, how would she have managed without leaving her fingerprints on the weapon?

[Jan]

Why not? She was hardly going to stop him, was she, besides which, if she HAD been responsible for shooting her entire family, how would she have managed without leaving her fingerprints on the weapon?

How would he not leave prints ? And as I said no need to clean them off as he has set the scene ?

Also if he put her prints on the casings then his footprints would be on top of the blood on the floor?

[Steve_uk]

How would he not leave prints ? And as I said no need to clean them off as he has set the scene ?

Also if he put her prints on the casings then his footprints would be on top of the blood on the floor?

Not if was in stockinged feet like David Bain.

[Jan]

Not if was in stockinged feet like David Bain.

So walking on carpet on socks on top of blood spots won't squash them or distort? And no blood will be picked up on the stockinged feet . Then I guess he took them off , before climbing out of the window.

He must be a lot brighter than I thought.

It's amazing how all these theories arise when my answer about the prints has not even been answered ?

[Jane]

How would he not leave prints ? And as I said no need to clean them off as he has set the scene ?

Also if he put her prints on the casings then his footprints would be on top of the blood on the floor?

You've got it sorted and planned from your own perspective AND with the benefit of hindsight, PLUS you're determined that Jeremy is innocent so you can't have him doing anything which might suggest otherwise. I think Jeremy was probably steps ahead of you. He'd worked out the best way for him to do it.

[Jan]

You've got it sorted and planned from your own perspective AND with the benefit of hindsight, PLUS you're determined that Jeremy is innocent so you can't have him doing anything which might suggest otherwise. I think Jeremy was probably steps ahead of you. He'd worked out the best way for him to do it.

 Yes of course that will be it . Not the fact that it was a crime that would have been very difficult to predict and plan every aspect . And then cover up so successfully .