Please forgive the observation, Roch, but prior to it being revealed that much of what you say has come from the CT, it had occurred to me that you were starting to speak with the fervency of a newly converted cult member. It bought to mind something I did about cults when I was at college, namely that the newly converted to -well, anything one can name, really,- are always more strident and emphatic in their beliefs than those bought up with them.
Hi Jane - you are forgiven
Honestly - I can say hand on heart - with regard to the case itself I have had no involvement with the CT or from the CT. I signed up to the Change.Org campaign about disclosure and that's as far as it goes.
I think Lorna Lake is genuine and nice person and Trudi has been friendly in the past - for example acknowledging if I have signed up to a campaign or shared something on social media etc. But that's as far as it goes. If members find it difficult to trust what I'm saying regarding physical evidence that was recorded but concealed then fair enough. Perhaps all I can urge is that they at least consider a position of neutrality on the case 50/50 until such time as disclosures can be made.
I do feel that a desperate need to dismiss the significance of evidence not yet made public, is the wrong motivation for wanting it to be made public! People / members should approach this issue with an open mind.
