Police V family

[buddy]

Who found incriminating evidence against JB?
Police a big fat zero.
The family.
1. The silencer.
2. Scratch marks on the mantle.
3. Blood and hair [missing] on the silencer.
4. Method of entry, and exit from the farm
5. Bicycle.
This list is not exhaustive, and I think others will remember more.
Are we to believe that the family were better than seasoned cops?
                                 

[Adam]

Who found incriminating evidence against JB?
Police a big fat zero.
The family.
1. The silencer.
2. Scratch marks on the mantle.
3. Blood and hair [missing] on the silencer.
4. Method of entry, and exit from the farm
5. Bicycle.
This list is not exhaustive, and I think others will remember more.
Are we to believe that the family were better than seasoned cops?
                               

You're listing undisputed facts. Silencer, bike, window.

It does not matter who found them, it incriminates Bamber.

The police working with witnesses to solve a crime. Hold the front page.

[buddy]

You're listing undisputed facts. Silencer, bike, window.

It does not matter who found them, it incriminates Bamber.

The police working with witnesses to solve a crime. Hold the front page.

Adam, I have you on ignore as I have no desire to read your biased posts.
You do not debate but like Caroline you DICTATE.
Kindly ignore my posts.

[Adam]

Adam, I have you on ignore as I have no desire to read your biased posts.
You do not debate but like Caroline you DICTATE.
Kindly ignore my posts.

Thought you had me on ignore ? Roch said he was putting me on ignore, but was scared I would be crucifying his posts, so took me off & responds to me. Sometimes after 4 requests.

You mean you can't answer my post ? That's alright, you walked into highlighting incriminating Bamber evidence. Found by witnesses who were also relatives. So what ?

I will be responding to you're posts and finding numerous faults as usual. You won't be defending yourself so you're weak posts & threads will look even worse. Clever move.

What should Bamber have done with Julie? Oh yes 'lob her overboard'.

[Roch]

This is linked to what I've been trying implore my fellow forum members about. It doesn't really matter which side of the divide you are on.  When new evidence is made public, relatives will do what they have always done from day one. They will strive to protect their own interests. They will blame police and claim they were kept in the dark. Yet the relatives were not only told Sheila was responsible, they also grafted and schemed to cook up evidence that convicted Jeremy.

[Adam]

This is linked to what I've been trying implore my fellow forum members about. It doesn't really matter which side of the divide you are on.  When new evidence is made public, relatives will do what they have always done from day one. They will strive to protect their own interests. They will blame police and claim they were kept in the dark. Yet the relatives were not only told Sheila was responsible, they also grafted and schemed to cook up evidence that convicted Jeremy.

What new evidence will be made public ? I thought the police were withholding documents. 

[buddy]

This is linked to what I've been trying implore my fellow forum members about. It doesn't really matter which side of the divide you are on.  When new evidence is made public, relatives will do what they have always done from day one. They will strive to protect their own interests. They will blame police and claim they were kept in the dark. Yet the relatives were not only told Sheila was responsible, they also grafted and schemed to cook up evidence that convicted Jeremy.

RWB saw the writing on the wall. He knew JB had no interest in farming, and would sell up.
The family would have been in deep crap.

[Adam]

RWB saw the writing on the wall. He knew JB had no interest in farming, and would sell up.
The family would have been in deep crap.

The relatives were already rich. Source supplied.

I agree Bamber had no interest in farming. Which is a reason he committed the massacre.

Witnessses who were relatives supplying the police with information is nothing new. The relatives are usually the closest people to the deceased & in this case, suspect.

Julie was not a relative & also brought up the bike & window. Together with loads of other things.

[Caroline]

Adam, I have you on ignore as I have no desire to read your biased posts.
You do not debate but like Caroline you DICTATE.
Kindly ignore my posts.

Wee rattled your cage? 

[Caroline]

This is linked to what I've been trying implore my fellow forum members about. It doesn't really matter which side of the divide you are on.  When new evidence is made public, relatives will do what they have always done from day one. They will strive to protect their own interests. They will blame police and claim they were kept in the dark. Yet the relatives were not only told Sheila was responsible, they also grafted and schemed to cook up evidence that convicted Jeremy.

But the police had no motive to go along with them.

[Adam]

But the police had no motive to go along with them.

RB had something on Peter Simpson. Although what that was & how RB obtained it,  has not been said.

[Caroline]

RB had something on Peter Simpson. Although what that was & how RB obtained it,  has not been said.

That magic 'something'?

[buddy]

I am not so narrow minded as some here.

[lookout]

That magic 'something'?

Manipulation ?

[JackiePreece]

This is linked to what I've been trying implore my fellow forum members about. It doesn't really matter which side of the divide you are on.  When new evidence is made public, relatives will do what they have always done from day one. They will strive to protect their own interests. They will blame police and claim they were kept in the dark. Yet the relatives were not only told Sheila was responsible, they also grafted and schemed to cook up evidence that convicted Jeremy.

The thing is Roch people do take notice. There are many forum members who also believe Jeremy is innocent but do not post because of the attacks. I really do not care who proves this conviction is unsafe the official campaign team or the very experienced journolists who are digging for the truth or the documentary makers looking for some important award as long as the truth comes out