Reason to believe cops shot Sheila, and how her blood ended up inside Silencer!

[Jane]

It's just occurred to me that if supporters are so certain that lies were told to convict Jeremy, I wonder how they'd feel about lies being told to get convictions of those they believe guilty?

[lookout]

We totally disagree on this point Lookout

It should happen,Jackie--------but sadly it won't.

[JackiePreece]

It should happen,Jackie--------but sadly it won't.

Believe me it will and all the people involved know it too

[Jane]

Believe me it will and all the people involved know it too

In your dreams.

[JackiePreece]

I think it says more about you! 

You know exactly what I mean and I intend to be right there when it happens

[JackiePreece]

In your dreams.

And I will be right there

[Roch]

It's just occurred to me that if supporters are so certain that lies were told to convict Jeremy, I wonder how they'd feel about lies being told to get convictions of those they believe guilty?

Which lies?

[Jane]

Which lies?

You tell me.

[Adam]

What physical evidence existed at the scene that 'implicated Sheila as the killer' ? How do you know this ?

What evidence were the relatives given that saw two of them 'accept that Sheila could have been the killer' ? How do you know this ?

What two relatives were these ? How do you know this ?

What evidence was concealed that had shown Sheila was the killer ? How do you know this ?

Why did the police conceal evidence to frame an innocent man ?

When do you believe the truth will be made public ? It's been 32 years.

Hopefully Roch will respond to my questions above. Which were asked earlier directly after reply 479 had been posted by him.

I got no reply earlier.

[Roch]

Hi Roch myself and many others know you only tell the truth and from reading your posts I know the evidence you refer to will exist and will implicate Sheila I don't have to see it to believe it I hope it does come to light at sometime as I now feel an innocent man is serving life for crimes he did not commit and that is horrendous

Hi Susan,

I may have been wrong in my interpretation of some aspects, nuances, documents etc over the years - but then again, so may have many others on here from both sides of the divide, so to speak.  Sometimes it comes down to opinions or even spin.

I am not known for leading members up the garden path.  Neither is the evidence I am referring to, likely to be open to interpretation. 

[Roch]

You tell me.

I dont follow hat you mean

[guest7363]

Which lies?

Hi Roch, you don't think a lot of lies and innuendo's have been made by people to do with Bamber then?  The problem with any conviction and any prosecution they get one shot at putting their case forward to a jury, if lies are found on the way the case collapses and the defendant gets off, the defence can invent innuendos and lies and make believe even after trial, until or hope something sticks.

Read a great article and listened to Jim Clemente about OJ Simpson and how he got off, unbelievable when he talked about the wetsuit and it being perfect for a murder, stops any scratches, bruises and easy to get rid of forensics, it was widely known to be the perfect garment for a murder?

[Jane]

I dont follow hat you mean

Roch, I don't think I could have made my question more clear. Supporters are saying that, amongst other things, lies were told which helped convict Jeremy, and because of that, innocent or guilty, he should be released. My question is, should lies be told to obtain a conviction for those who allegedly told the lies, would supporters say the conviction should be quashed?

[Roch]

Hi Roch, you don't think a lot of lies and innuendo's have been made by people to do with Bamber then?  The problem with any conviction and any prosecution they get one shot at putting their case forward to a jury, if lies are found on the way the case collapses and the defendant gets off, the defence can invent innuendos and lies and make believe even after trial, until or hope something sticks.

Read a great article and listened to Jim Clemente about OJ Simpson and how he got off, unbelievable when he talked about the wetsuit and it being perfect for a murder, stops any scratches, bruises and easy to get rid of forensics, it was widely known to be the perfect garment for a murder?

Hi Justice. Interesting - but there is / was no proof that any wetsuit was linked to the murders.   I think Janes is implying that the evidence I'm referring to is lies?

[Adam]

It seems that Roch is not going to answer my questions. Which I posted in replies 484 & 520. In response to his reply 479.

I don't mind posters making several huge statements in one long post. Providing they have sources to justify these.

If they have no sources, that is fine as making wild claims that can't be proven is a tactic of most supporters. However it is dangerous as gullible posters like Susan will be influenced by long posts. Even if they are unsourced.