Author Topic: Jeremy's assumptions about his sister's meds and relatives' opinions  (Read 37369 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline JackiePreece

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4743
Re: Jeremy's assumptions about his sister's meds and relatives' opinions
« Reply #405 on: April 17, 2017, 05:24:PM »
I don't believe that there was any gas/electricity man.

Once again the phrase

'I don't believe'

So just say you don't know

You do or you dont
"No hour of life is wasted that is spent in the saddle" Winston Churchill

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Jeremy's assumptions about his sister's meds and relatives' opinions
« Reply #406 on: April 17, 2017, 05:25:PM »
Once again the phrase

'I don't believe'

So just say you don't know

You do or you dont

I'll  say what the hell I like.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: Jeremy's assumptions about his sister's meds and relatives' opinions
« Reply #407 on: April 17, 2017, 05:28:PM »
David if you'd followed the argument today you'd realize that some members are disputing the authenticity of that story.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Jeremy's assumptions about his sister's meds and relatives' opinions
« Reply #408 on: April 17, 2017, 05:30:PM »
I don't believe you

The subject of the photos of Sheila has been discussed on this forum for years

Take you own advice!

"Once again the phrase

'I don't believe'

So just say you don't know

You do or you dont"




Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Jeremy's assumptions about his sister's meds and relatives' opinions
« Reply #409 on: April 17, 2017, 05:46:PM »
Where is the extract taken from?






Probably the investigating officer who never" coughed".I think it only surfaced in 2003 !

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: Jeremy's assumptions about his sister's meds and relatives' opinions
« Reply #410 on: April 17, 2017, 05:53:PM »





Probably the investigating officer who never" coughed".I think it only surfaced in 2003 !
I can't find it in any of the books lookout and scrutinizing it again I can't see why the housekeeper or Barbara didn't let the electrician in, then June appears out of nowhere when she's normally off on her travels doing charity work.

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13651
Re: Jeremy's assumptions about his sister's meds and relatives' opinions
« Reply #411 on: April 17, 2017, 06:01:PM »

Ooops! I'm either showing my age OR the man selling fizzy drinks was still doing his rounds in the depths of deepest, darkest Essex. ;D ;D ;D ;D
I remember the Corona Man Jane, he was orange and very sparkly.  Obvs didn't venture up to the wild wastelands of the NE.  ;D

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Jeremy's assumptions about his sister's meds and relatives' opinions
« Reply #412 on: April 17, 2017, 06:08:PM »
I can't find it in any of the books lookout and scrutinizing it again I can't see why the housekeeper or Barbara didn't let the electrician in, then June appears out of nowhere when she's normally off on her travels doing charity work.





Probably the reason it wasn't in past publications is self evident as it didn't show up until 2003,or even later,before publication of CP's,Colin's or Wilkes books.
Then when the information did become available,those books which are biased,such as PH and CAL's weren't likely to give that part an airing.
Whether it's mentioned in Lomax's,I don't know. ( can't remember )
As for nobody else being in at the time,it could well have been tea-time and June had appeared on the off-chance returning from her " duties " in time to catch the meter-reader,perhaps.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33781
Re: Jeremy's assumptions about his sister's meds and relatives' opinions
« Reply #413 on: April 17, 2017, 06:09:PM »
I remember the Corona Man Jane, he was orange and very sparkly.  Obvs didn't venture up to the wild wastelands of the NE.  ;D

His poor horse would never have made it that far, Maggie., but he could have made it in his lorry ;D

Offline Lucy522

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 805
Re: Jeremy's assumptions about his sister's meds and relatives' opinions
« Reply #414 on: April 17, 2017, 06:16:PM »






I don't see that as a "typical domestic", why the need to mention her not taking her medication if she was acting normally?

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Jeremy's assumptions about his sister's meds and relatives' opinions
« Reply #415 on: April 17, 2017, 07:02:PM »
I don't see that as a "typical domestic", why the need to mention her not taking her medication if she was acting normally?

That sentence about the medication proves this whole things is BS - Sheila was taking her medication!
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Lucy522

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 805
Re: Jeremy's assumptions about his sister's meds and relatives' opinions
« Reply #416 on: April 17, 2017, 07:09:PM »
That sentence about the medication proves this whole things is BS - Sheila was taking her medication!
Why would a random person bring that up caroline? How would they know anything about medication Sheila may or may not be taking? She was a stranger. Seems June felt the need to condone her behaviour somewhat. Maybe she hadn't taken it, how was Sheila outside screaming and shouting when she was so "over sedated" she couldn't get off the sofa?

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33781
Re: Jeremy's assumptions about his sister's meds and relatives' opinions
« Reply #417 on: April 17, 2017, 07:11:PM »
That sentence about the medication proves this whole things is BS - Sheila was taking her medication!

She couldn't have avoided it had she wanted to. It was injected.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Jeremy's assumptions about his sister's meds and relatives' opinions
« Reply #418 on: April 17, 2017, 07:12:PM »
I don't see that as a "typical domestic", why the need to mention her not taking her medication if she was acting normally?





Sheila didn't take all of the medication which had been prescribed to her anyway.

June would have made that as an excuse for her behaviour.You would do/say that if you were protecting someone's mental health,wouldn't you ? It wouldn't have been the sort of illness that you'd broadcast,especially if you'd been June who was very private. Although this was the problem,because nobody knew about Sheila's outbursts,nobody would have believed Jeremy would they ?

Offline Lucy522

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 805




Sheila didn't take all of the medication which had been prescribed to her anyway.

June would have made that as an excuse for her behaviour.You would do/say that if you were protecting someone's mental health,wouldn't you ? It wouldn't have been the sort of illness that you'd broadcast,especially if you'd been June who was very private. Although this was the problem,because nobody knew about Sheila's outbursts,nobody would have believed Jeremy would they ?

Clearly not, she was trying to protect her, which is what mothers do, she was either to over sedated to the point she couldn't get off the sofa OR hadnt taken her meds (which had been halved) which left her prone to violent outbursts, it can't be both ways? Which one was it?