0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Because he got wind of the remark she made to June and Barbara Wilson round the breakfast table: "All people are bad and should be killed.". It was manna from heaven for Jeremy who had feigned interest in the Farm for his own evil purposes, but this interest only brought forth the offer from Nevill of farming Little Rentners Farm, done for the best of intentions but would just have entrapped his son in a lifestyle he had not chosen and felt no empathy for. Sheila had had a similar offer from June of managing an antiques shop in the locality, but again these were the parents' ideas of what would be suitable for their children and not the aspirations of individuals who had been spoiled, who didn't understand the value of money and through Nevill's long hours and June's illness never bonded fully with their parents.
Hey, how did you know where I was, are you stalking me?
No I go there all the time. My friend has a caravan there
That's where I have a problem , they hadn't got a clue about jeremy or shiela, they made big assumptions on a minute bit of information they did have about her. I don't believe for a minute that they really knew how shiela illness was affecting her and neither did many others. I think we've created the scene where shiela was unable to do anything and didn't have any coordination from the family who really did not know what it was doing to her and feel guilters have just decided this is tge truth and that shiela wasn't capable. !Ithink it is really iimportant for all her medical records to be released so we can see if it is in fact true or not. I do find It odd that guilters will not consider that her illness could have been the reason she did it and that it was completely possible that she was more than capable .
Remember us to Anne
Firstly, if Sheila was 'so easy to control' and this 'benefited Bamber' - how was he unable to correctly shoot her on the first occasion? The most crucial shot he had to make that night - and he couldn't even control her properly or aim it properly. He also knowingly risked having to shoot her more than once -because he knowingly used a low calibre weapon intended for killing vermin.What rubbish.
Fuck off you police informant worm. Report me to the moderators for saying that there's a bullshit alert relating to what we are expected to believe from police and prosecution?
I've wanted to say those words many times rochThis has tickled me He's absolutely infuriating. Using sarcasm in ever single one of hisPosts as if we are blooming stupid then reports us for responding. Madness
At the risk of getting my head bitten off (although I'm kind of used it it), he couldn't have used a shot gun because it required loading too often and he risked being over powered. You don't know that the two shots to Sheila happened because he couldn't over power her. He may have thought the first shot was enough to kill her but them realised she wasn't dead (for whatever reason) and ha to make the decision whether or not to risk leaving her to die from the first wound or shoot her again. We know what he decided.
Bamber had to use the rifle for shooting vermin as the murder weapon. Otherwise he couldn't claim he went out to shoot rabbits.
The rifle was also the best weapon as there was a possibility of completing the massacre without having to reload. Although that didn't happen & guilters take joy in disputing that Sheila could chamber, breach & reload. Twice.