Prominent injustice campaigner Bob Woffinden changes his view to "guilty"

[grahameb]

I asked my friend about why Bob Woffinden changed his belief of Jeremy from innocent to guilty and this is what they told me.
I'm sorry but this person must remain anonymous for their protection. They really don't want to be involved any more because of all the trouble that has been happening. although they still believe in his innocence. Here is what they said:
"Hi Grahame, yes I did ask him and he replied by saying we should meet and discuss it but to be honest I have met him many times and he has been to my house more occasions than I can count when he was supporting Jeremy and wanted help and information and now I just don't want to be bothered.......I didn't mind paying the cost of the train fare when it was to benefit Jeremy but now I have better things to spend my money on!!!! I just find it so odd because he was such a big supporter....and I believe genuine too so I am curious but not enough to make any real effort now."

The reason why this person doesn't want to make the effort is because they have just got out of hospital and aren't feeling very well right now.

What do you make of this Graham, or is she just another one Lying?? (This was where his plan began to go awry. Nevill, who had earlier confided in Barbara Wilson, the farm secretary, that he suspected Jeremy was planning to kill him)

All I know is that my friend has met Woffendin many times. But he insists on speaking to her only if they meet. I think as ngb says there is more to Woffendin than meets the eye. Something made him change his stand and it was old rubbish like the silly wetsuit story or the one about the telephones. All old stuff that he had considered originally.

[tyler]

Grahame,do you mean the kind of theories that Vidvic is still rattling out 26 years later? 
Sorry Vidvic,but please please give us some solid evidence as to proof of Jeremys guilt   

[grahameb]

Grahame,do you mean the kind of theories that Vidvic is still rattling out 26 years later? 
Sorry Vidvic,but please please give us some solid evidence as to proof of Jeremys guilt   

Yes. Basically Woffendin's "chilling new evidence" is just about the telephones and the old wetsuit theory of Robert Boutflour? Seems a very strange thing to do for an apparently skilled and intelligent investigator?

[Enigma]

Isn't it more interesting that Barbara Wilson was so distraught after the murders because Neville had confided in her? A shame she could not be a witness as surely no-one on here would suspect her of somehow trying to set Bamber up along with the rest of your suspects?I am pretty sure she wasn't likely to iinherit anything!!!
 

Well said Fred.
I saw the programme where Barbara Wilson talked about what Neville had said to her and believed every word she said; she is certainly not a person to be dismissed as a greedy conspirator against Saint Jeremy and had no axe to grind.

[mike tesko]

DS Jones falsified his pocketbook (49) entries regarding his role in case

What happened to the missing five months worth of evidence (5th November 1984, to 4th April 1985) that should have been written into the cover of this pocketbook? I will be posting copies of the actual contents of DS 21 Jones pocketbook shortly, and corresponding page numbers of all his entries...

This pocketbook bears an official ESSEX police stamp, and date of issue (5th November 1984) and must have been issued to DS 21 Jones, by a senior officer, who must also be involved in the conspiracy with DS Jones, to pervert the course of justice, and falsifying documentary evidence...

Why has no action been taken against either of them?

Crime Writer, Bob Woffinden, ought to do an article on this matter:-

[clifford]

DS Jones falsified his pocketbook (49) entries regarding his role in case

What happened to the missing five months worth of evidence (5th November 1984, to 4th April 1985) that should have been written into the cover of this pocketbook? I will be posting copies of the actual contents of DS 21 Jones pocketbook shortly, and corresponding page numbers of all his entries...

This pocketbook bears an official ESSEX police stamp, and date of issue (5th November 1984) and must have been issued to DS 21 Jones, by a senior officer, who must also be involved in the conspiracy with DS Jones, to pervert the course of justice, and falsifying documentary evidence...

Why has no action been taken against either of them?

Crime Writer, Bob Woffinden, ought to do an article on this matter:-

Mike, am I missing something here. If the pocket was issued on 5/11/84 to 4/4/85 what evidence is missing, as the murders were on 7/8/85 or have I lost it somewhere. Thanks

[grahameb]

DS Jones falsified his pocketbook (49) entries regarding his role in case

What happened to the missing five months worth of evidence (5th November 1984, to 4th April 1985) that should have been written into the cover of this pocketbook? I will be posting copies of the actual contents of DS 21 Jones pocketbook shortly, and corresponding page numbers of all his entries...

This pocketbook bears an official ESSEX police stamp, and date of issue (5th November 1984) and must have been issued to DS 21 Jones, by a senior officer, who must also be involved in the conspiracy with DS Jones, to pervert the course of justice, and falsifying documentary evidence...

Why has no action been taken against either of them?

Crime Writer, Bob Woffinden, ought to do an article on this matter:-

Mike, am I missing something here. If the pocket was issued on 5/11/84 to 4/4/85 what evidence is missing, as the murders were on 7/8/85 or have I lost it somewhere. Thanks

I think the finish date on the notebook looks like 86?

[mike tesko]

DS Jones falsified his pocketbook (49) entries regarding his role in case

What happened to the missing five months worth of evidence (5th November 1984, to 4th April 1985) that should have been written into the cover of this pocketbook? I will be posting copies of the actual contents of DS 21 Jones pocketbook shortly, and corresponding page numbers of all his entries...

This pocketbook bears an official ESSEX police stamp, and date of issue (5th November 1984) and must have been issued to DS 21 Jones, by a senior officer, who must also be involved in the conspiracy with DS Jones, to pervert the course of justice, and falsifying documentary evidence...

Why has no action been taken against either of them?

Crime Writer, Bob Woffinden, ought to do an article on this matter:-

Mike, am I missing something here. If the pocket was issued on 5/11/84 to 4/4/85 what evidence is missing, as the murders were on 7/8/85 or have I lost it somewhere. Thanks

I think the finish date on the notebook looks like 86?

-------------------

Finish date, 86, correct (which was after WHF)...

[mike tesko]

DS Jones falsified his pocketbook (49) entries regarding his role in case

What happened to the missing five months worth of evidence (5th November 1984, to 4th April 1985) that should have been written into the cover of this pocketbook? I will be posting copies of the actual contents of DS 21 Jones pocketbook shortly, and corresponding page numbers of all his entries...

This pocketbook bears an official ESSEX police stamp, and date of issue (5th November 1984) and must have been issued to DS 21 Jones, by a senior officer, who must also be involved in the conspiracy with DS Jones, to pervert the course of justice, and falsifying documentary evidence...

Why has no action been taken against either of them?

Crime Writer, Bob Woffinden, ought to do an article on this matter:-

Mike, am I missing something here. If the pocket was issued on 5/11/84 to 4/4/85 what evidence is missing, as the murders were on 7/8/85 or have I lost it somewhere. Thanks

------------------

The original pocketbook (49) details, would have covered 5th November 1984 to 7th May 1986, and presumably would not have contained the evidence which was later re-written into new pages which were inserted into the cover of the pocketbook and modified to exclude the truth about him finding a silencer at the scene, on 7th August 1985 etc...

His involvement with crime scene ammunition, and the relationship he had with the relatives, and with Julie Mugford, would also be excluded in the re-written notes...