If Jeremy was released

[Caroline]

What he wants and what he may have to accept are two very different things. IF a technicality were found on which he could be released, I very much doubt that he'd be allowed tom stay in prison. I have even greater doubts that he'd choose to stay inside if freedom, under whatever circumstances, had been/was offered. NO ONE would be that altruistic. To suggest that Jeremy would be is laughable in the extreme.

A technicality might mean a retrial - he may get convicted again BUT ..... I doubt Jeremy would be happy with a technicality because I doubt every much that a compensation package would be offered. He could sell his story but the money wouldn't last long. He's be pretty much living on the breadline.

[Jane]

A technicality might mean a retrial - he may get convicted again BUT ..... I doubt Jeremy would be happy with a technicality because I doubt every much that a compensation package would be offered. He could sell his story but the money wouldn't last long. He's be pretty much living on the breadline.

Hmm? Freedom with no home and no money versus three square meals a day and a roof over his head, plus free use of a gym? Eny meeny miney moh

[Caroline]

Hmm? Freedom with no home and no money versus three square meals a day and a roof over his head, plus free use of a gym? Eny meeny miney moh

Hence no confession 

[lookout]

One thing for sure,he wouldn't end up dumped outside the gates of the jail like Victor Nealon had been,with £40 in his pocket. How disgusting was that after years spent inside for a crime he hadn't committed. ? What a delightful system,how caring they are !

[notsure]

I suppose they could say the conviction was unsafe but that wouldn't give him any compensation. I would say he should stay where he is unless it can be proven that ep jm AE and the like set him up in which case he would get loads a money from interviews etc plus the 500,000 I would expect if that were the case AE wouldn't be living at WHF for long.

[Jane]

I suppose they could say the conviction was unsafe but that wouldn't give him any compensation. I would say he should stay where he is unless it can be proven that ep jm AE and the like set him up in which case he would get loads a money from interviews etc plus the 500,000 I would expect if that were the case AE wouldn't be living at WHF for long.

The Eaton's don't own WHF any more than the Bamber's did. It was leased to them by the trust.

[Caroline]

I suppose they could say the conviction was unsafe but that wouldn't give him any compensation. I would say he should stay where he is unless it can be proven that ep jm AE and the like set him up in which case he would get loads a money from interviews etc plus the 500,000 I would expect if that were the case AE wouldn't be living at WHF for long.

That's quite an if.

[lookout]

I suppose they could say the conviction was unsafe but that wouldn't give him any compensation. I would say he should stay where he is unless it can be proven that ep jm AE and the like set him up in which case he would get loads a money from interviews etc plus the 500,000 I would expect if that were the case AE wouldn't be living at WHF for long.

He wouldn't have anything to do with the relatives or the farm.

[Jane]

He wouldn't have anything to do with the relatives or the farm.

There would probably have to be an exclusion clause put in place.

[notsure]

The Eaton's don't own WHF any more than the Bamber's did. It was leased to them by the trust.

Yes but they earn there living fro  it so they wouldn't b there long would they

[notsure]

What I  trying to get at is if they were found to have framed him ie scratch mark evidence he would go after what was owed to him. Who wouldn't. I blooming well would.

[lookout]

There would probably have to be an exclusion clause put in place.

That wouldn't worry him !!

[Caroline]

What I  trying to get at is if they were found to have framed him ie scratch mark evidence he would go after what was owed to him. Who wouldn't. I blooming well would.

Unless they admitted to doing so, there is no way to prove it.

[Adam]

I suppose they could say the conviction was unsafe but that wouldn't give him any compensation. I would say he should stay where he is unless it can be proven that ep jm AE and the like set him up in which case he would get loads a money from interviews etc plus the 500,000 I would expect if that were the case AE wouldn't be living at WHF for long.

Bamber's not going to get a technicality, unsafe conviction or prove he's innocent. It's been 31 years.

[notsure]

Unless they admitted to doing so, there is no way to prove it.

well I'm a bit unsure of this evidence. I think peter Sutherst put real doubt on this and further photographic evidence may well prove it.