Why would Ann Eaton need the names of CCRC members who agreed to 2002 Appeal?

[Jane]

    She thought she had "found a way". EP acting as her proxies

Is there anything that you can't turn into something devious and underhand.

[lookout]

Lookout, please STOP trying to make everything about you. You use every opportunity to say how YOU'D have done/said and then it becomes personal. It makes debating very difficult.

Why do you ALWAYS lose your rag when I'm right ?? STOP being obstropolous.

[gringo]

Is there anything that you can't turn into something devious and underhand.

   I don't need to turn it into something devious and underhand. It is devious and underhand.
     Do you still think that AE wanted to ""write to them all personally to thank them for the work they,ve done"?
     Funny that she only wanted the names of the members who agreed to the Appeal.

[Jane]

Why do you ALWAYS lose your rag when I'm right ?? STOP being obstropolous.

I haven't lost my rag -and by the way, the word is OBSTREPEROUS and I'm not being that either- I'm just asking you to refrain from making it personal by turning everything into something you would/wouldn't have done. It isn't about you.

[lookout]

I haven't lost my rag -and by the way, the word is OBSTREPEROUS and I'm not being that either- I'm just asking you to refrain from making it personal by turning everything into something you would/wouldn't have done. It isn't about you.

It was a perfectly obvious question that I'd asked,without the need for a barrage of excuses about it being " me,or personal " ! I was only making a suggestion-------which isn't forbidden,is it ?
That word can be spelt either way depending where you come from.It means the same thing !

[Jane]

   I don't need to turn it into something devious and underhand. It is devious and underhand.
     Do you still think that AE wanted to ""write to them all personally to thank them for the work they,ve done"?
     Funny that she only wanted the names of the members who agreed to the Appeal.

According to you, it is. As I can't read her mind I can't say what her motives might be. I fail to see that she's done anything illegal. What ever happened to innocent until proven guilty?

[Caroline]

    This is a very odd request made by Ann Eaton to the EP and hints at something sinister.
    What purpose is served by Ann Eaton knowing who the CCRC members were? What does she intend to do with this information?
     Why are EP indulging this request and making enquiries on her behalf resulting in them giving Ann Eaton the requested information?
   

First of all, you have claimed this with nothing to back it up, if there is documentation then please post it so ww can make up our own minds regarding 'suspiciousness'.

[gringo]

First of all, you have claimed this with nothing to back it up, if there is documentation then please post it so ww can make up our own minds regarding 'suspiciousness'.

   The document is on Twitpics.

[Jane]

It was a perfectly obvious question that I'd asked,without the need for a barrage of excuses about it being " me,or personal " ! I was only making a suggestion-------which isn't forbidden,is it ?
That word can be spelt either way depending where you come from.It means the same thing !

You're correct. It was a suggestion. I'm sure there were others. I've looked up YOUR spelling from three different sources. NONE contain it. When I Googled it the way you spelled it, it was changed to the way I spelled it. It isn't interchangeable like spelled and spelt.

[Caroline]

   The document is on Twitpics.

There are lots of doc on twitpics. I often provide links so ...... ?

[gringo]

Perhaps she wanted to write to them all personally...................to thank them for the work they've done.

    Perhaps she wanted to write to them all personally......to explain why she took her murdered uncle's wallet.

[Jane]

    Perhaps she wanted to write to them all personally......to explain why she took her murdered uncle's wallet.

She could have done that with a "To Whom It May Concern". No need for it to have been personal.

[Caroline]

    Perhaps she wanted to write to them all personally......to explain why she took her murdered uncle's wallet.

Link?

[lookout]

Link?

The information given to AE from the Met Police is on Bambertweets headed "Shockingly Met Police give Ann Eaton confidential Information about who Jeremy Bamber's CCRC case commissioners were !
" 
AE had wanted to know the names of those individuals who were involved with the appeal of 2002.

[Jane]

The information given to AE from the Met Police is on Bambertweets headed "Shockingly Met Police give Ann Eaton confidential Information about who Jeremy Bamber's CCRC case commissioners were !
" 
AE had wanted to know the names of those individuals who were involved with the appeal of 2002.

I'm not certain that putting something on Bambertweets constitutes guarantees that the information is true. You only have to look at some of the things put forward -as being truth- here.