Murders at White House Farm by Carol Ann Lee.

[guest1199]

You said the gun was 'totally inappropriate'.

So I assume you know there were more appropriate weapons available.

So what should he have used ?

None of them, and he didn't.   I've already said this. 

Hoots!

[Caroline]

I never said this.  The quotes that you post seem to have your warped spin on them. You do know what a straw-man argument is?

Hoots

There is a LOT of that on the innocent side too, it isn't an exclusive guilty feature.

[Adam]

I never said this.  The quotes that you post seem to have your warped spin on them.  You do know what a straw-man argument is?

Hoots

This was dealt with a few days ago.

Can you please tell me what would have been a more 'appropriate' available weapon of choice for Bamber. Forth request.

As well as say how Bamber would not come out of a fight with Nevill unscathed but Sheila would. Second request.

[Adam]

None of them, and he didn't.   I've already said this. 

Hoots!

So none of the weapons would suit a 2am massacre ?

Sheila with her shooting, chambering, breaching & reloading skills showed otherwise. And she did so without getting any oil or gun shot residue on her.

Then again, she did go on a shooting expedition 10 years earlier.

[Adam]

It's disappointing that TomG tried to imply that Bamber had better weapon options available to him. And the fact that he didn't choose one of these shows he's innocent.

He even tried to make counter arguments to my reasons why Bamber choose the weapon he did.

However when it came to the crunch TomG couldn't offer a better weapon alternative. This was after trying to deny that he made the claim in the first place.

Roch made the same weapon argument recently. But stonewalled all questions on better alternative weapons.

[guest1199]

This was dealt with a few days ago.

Can you please tell me what would have been a more 'appropriate' available weapon of choice for Bamber. Forth request.

As well as say how Bamber would not come out of a fight with Nevill unscathed but Sheila would. Second request.

Adam.  None of these scenarios exist as facts, they are merely hypothetical situations.  It seems that you think that if I offered any solutions to these hypothetical situations then I would be breathing life into them which would then transform them into facts in your mind.  This would then give you a springboard to argue that I'd conceded these points as facts. 

I have answered your points upthread but you seem to have a problem comprehending them.  It also seems that you attach the most tenous interpretations of my posts and come to the most bizarre conclusions.  It seems that you are not so much offering a decent counter argument but exposing a flaw in your logic that I can't comprehend.

I can't offer any further argument simply because you don't make any sense.

Hoots!

[guest1199]

Caroline

Thanks for your theory of the crime, I'll copy and paste it and add my considerations to it.   I might be so convinced of it that I'll change my mind entirely and become pro-guilt.  In the meantime I have a stir-fry and a bottle of spiced rum that I intend to make significant inroads into, so I won't post any more this evening.

Adam

It's been a hot day up here, I take it its been warm down south too.  Take it easy!

Hoots!

[Adam]

Adam.  None of these scenarios exist as facts, they are merely hypothetical situations.  It seems that you think that if I offered any solutions to these hypothetical situations then I would be breathing life into them which would then transform them into facts in your mind.  This would then give you a springboard to argue that I'd conceded these points as facts. 

I have answered your points upthread but you seem to have a problem comprehending them.  It also seems that you attach the most tenous interpretations of my posts and come to the most bizarre conclusions.  It seems that you are not so much offering a decent counter argument but exposing a flaw in your logic that I can't comprehend.

I can't offer any further argument simply because you don't make any sense.

Hoots!

I just asked what would be a better weapon for Bamber after you said the murder weapon was 'totally inappropriate'. You intially denied saying it & eventually said there were no better options for Bamber.

The other question was after you suggested Bamber wouldn't come out of the kitchen fight unscathed. I asked why Bamber wouldn't but Sheila did & left a link to a thread on this for you to contribute to. You didn't answer this question.

[Caroline]

Caroline

Thanks for your theory of the crime, I'll copy and paste it and add my considerations to it.   I might be so convinced of it that I'll change my mind entirely and become pro-guilt.  In the meantime I have a stir-fry and a bottle of spiced rum that I intend to make significant inroads into, so I won't post any more this evening.

Adam

It's been a hot day up here, I take it its been warm down south too.  Take it easy!

Hoots!

Enjoy!

[guest7363]

Caroline

Thanks for your theory of the crime, I'll copy and paste it and add my considerations to it.   I might be so convinced of it that I'll change my mind entirely and become pro-guilt.  In the meantime I have a stir-fry and a bottle of spiced rum that I intend to make significant inroads into, so I won't post any more this evening.

Adam

It's been a hot day up here, I take it its been warm down south too.  Take it easy!

Hoots!

Well said Tom G

Hoots

[guest1199]

You intially denied saying it & eventually said there were no better options for Bamber.

Substantiate this.

Hoots!

[Adam]

This sounds like more straw-man argument.  He didn't use any weapon, all were inappropriate, he didn't do the crime.  Can you quote where I suggested that JB had opted for the wrong choice of weapon.

Hoots!

[Adam]

Substantiate this.

Hoots!

You keep denying saying things. Probably because you have realised it is another rubbish idea.

I have had to look and re quote you're posts on 5 different things. It takes time to find them. So I won't be doing it again.

Either come up with valid arguments or quit posting.

[lookout]

See what I mean ? Centre stage,or else !! Tsk.

[Adam]

Things TomG denied saying -

Bamber used the wrong weapon.

Bamber "did not committ the crime".

Bamber is innocent because Nevill was shot from inches away in the mouth & jaw.

Bamber is innocent because no one knows where Nevill was when June was being shot.

Bamber would not have got through a fight with Nevill unscathed.