For TomG
Roch yesterday said Bamber would not have chosen the murder weapon to commit the massacre.
This was because Bamber chose to fire a second shot into Sheila an inch higher than the first. Although the first shot may have eventually killed her.
No suggestion of what other available weapon Bamber should have used was forthcoming. Despite three requests. Which was disappointing.
There are several reasons why Bamber chose this weapon:
It was light.
A silencer could be fitted.
It could store 11 bullets.
Bamber could load it at supper to pretend to go to shoot rabbits.
Bamber could give the police his rabbit story.
Bamber testified he knew how to use the murder weapon.
There was a possibility of completing the massacre without having to reload.
If he did have to re load there were bullets available.
There were not many other rifles at WHF. It was a farm, not a military base.
------------------------
Do other people believe Bamber chose the correct weapon to committ the massacre ? If not, what available weapon should he have used ?