Author Topic: Gun at first floor window - set to shoot safety of convictions to bits!!  (Read 13283 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
The 'bodies moved', the 'rifle moved', the 'bibles moved', 'items of evidential value' moved by 'disguising them with exhibit references of other exhibits'! 'Edited, typed composite statements created in other peoples names, unsigned'!
« Last Edit: March 14, 2017, 12:18:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
The 'bodies moved', the 'rifle moved', the 'bibles moved', 'items of evidential value' moved by 'disguising them with exhibit references of other exhibits'! 'Edited, typed composite statements created in other peoples names, unsigned'!

The sequence with which photographs were taken fiddled about with, edited, Composite photograph albums created to hide the corruption involved! 581 original photographs (THE SENIOR INVESTIGATING OFFICERS ALBUM), secreted away, hid in ACC Peter Simpsons safe in his office, after he ordered DC Bird to create a 'composite version of the same, only this time it only had 223 photographs contained inside it, and it was given the rather dubious and very ,misleading title of 'THE MASTER COPY ALBUM'! The dishonesty did not end there, because cops and CPS created another composite photographic album consisting of only 50 of the photographs, hand picked to help the prosecution pull the wool over the juries eyes. This became known as 'THE COURT ALBUM'...

(a) 581 photographs contained in 'THE SENIOR INVESTIGATING OFFICERS ALBUM'
(b) 223 photographs contained in 'THE MASTER COPY ALBUM' (558 missing retained in (a)
(c) 050 photographs contained in 'THE COURT ALBUM' (500 missing retained in (b)
« Last Edit: March 14, 2017, 12:30:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
They tampered with the integrity of the batch of Crime Scene Bullets, and they tampered with the batch of bullet cases recovered from the Crime scene! Now, why would the scum of the earth want to tamper with the true exhibits, unless they had something to hide?
« Last Edit: March 14, 2017, 02:16:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Comparison tests of markings present upon bullet cases, were made on the following dates, at the lab' prior to the batch of crime scene bullet cases, being received at the lab', so could someone from the opposition camp please explain to me how this could have happened?
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Comparison tests of markings present upon bullet cases, were made on the following dates, at the lab' prior to the batch of crime scene bullet cases, being received at the lab', so could someone from the opposition camp please explain to me how this could have happened?

You are required to spell out in the queens basic English, how these comparison tests (all of them) could have been careied out on any date prior to 20th Auguat 1985?
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
What we are dealing with here is 'STATE CORRUPTION', where the perpetrators believe they are immune from prosecution, no matter what!!!
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
What we are dealing with here is 'STATE CORRUPTION', where the perpetrators believe they are immune from prosecution, no matter what!!!

OK, lets tamper with the batch of crime scene bullets, Crime scene bullet cases, and rounds of control ammunition! If you all want to support such corrupt actions then so be it! Honestly, just ask yourselves how these comparison tests could have been carried out prior to the Lab' receiving the batch of Crime Scene ammunition, on 20th September 1985?

Go on, ask yourselves!!!
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
OK, lets tamper with the batch of crime scene bullets, Crime scene bullet cases, and rounds of control ammunition! If you all want to support such corrupt actions then so be it! Honestly, just ask yourselves how these comparison tests could have been carried out prior to the Lab' receiving the batch of Crime Scene ammunition, on 20th September 1985?

Go on, ask yourselves!!!

What we find is that these 'illegal' comparison tests, involving bullets, and spent cartridge cases, occurred on the 12th, 13th, 18th, and 19th September 1985 - too soon unfortunately for these to have been carried out lawfully and correctly!! Why I hear you ask, was this an illegal exercise?

Well, Lab' didn't officially receive the batch of crime scene ammunition (bullets and cases) until 20th September 1985! How then could comparison tests of the same have been completed beforehand?

Whoooops!!
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
What we find is that these 'illegal' comparison tests, involving bullets, and spent cartridge cases, occurred on the 12th, 13th, 18th, and 19th September 1985 - too soon unfortunately for these to have been carried out lawfully and correctly!! Why I hear you ask, was this an illegal exercise?

Well, Lab' didn't officially receive the batch of crime scene ammunition (bullets and cases) until 20th September 1985! How then could comparison tests of the same have been completed beforehand?

Whoooops!!

What a coincidence, that these 'unofficial' comparison tests were carried out when they were ( prior to the ballistic expert, Malcom Fletcher, receiving the batch of crime scene ammunition used in the shootings, consisting of 25 bullet, part bullet, or bullet fragments, 25 spent cartridge cases, and 29 control rounds, which he test fired on 20th, 25th September, and 2nd October 1985, and carried out official comparison tests, on those dates of the remaining crime scene bullets, and spent cartridge cases)...

The problem for Fletcher, is that his signature appears on all the 'General Examination Records' , where comparison tests were carried out on 12th, 13th, 18th and 19th September, 1985! Thus he is linked to the official comparison tests carried out on and after 20th September 1985, and linked to the unofficial comparison tests carried out prior to 20th September 1985!

When interviewed by COLP regarding the test firing of the anshuzt rifle (DRH/15), with control ammunition (DRH/42) he stated that he had received the batch of crime scene ammunition on 20th September 1985, and that he then proceeded to test fire the rifle with the batch of control ammunition, firing shots through the rifle with a silencer fitted, and without a silencer fitted! COLP established that Fletcher had only used 27 of the 29 control rounds, and after pointing this discrepancy out to him, Fletcher then offered the excuse that these two missing control rounds must have either been lost, or discarded!

Well, in order for the other 'unofficial test firing' to have taken place, there would have needed to have been an unofficial test fire of the rifle and two control rounds which took place prior to Fletcher receiving them officially on 20th September, 1985! Therefore, Fletcher has lied about his involvement with the full compliment of crime scene ammunition, consisting of 25 bullets, part bullets, and fragmented pieces of bullet, and 25 spent cartridge cases, along with 29 control rounds! He is tied to the unofficial test firing and the unofficial comparison tests which were conducted on 12th, 13th, 18th and 19th September 1985, and the official test firing of the rifle, and the official comparison tests of crime scene bullets, part bullets, and fragments of bullets, spent cartridge cases, and 27 control rounds, on and after' the 20th September 1985 (20th, 25th September, and 2nd October 1985)!

As I say, and I agree with Ewen Smiths view that Fletcher was a dodgy expert!

He was dodgy alright!

How do I know he is dodgy?

It's simple really...
« Last Edit: March 15, 2017, 02:38:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Please pay attention!!
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Please pay attention!!

In one of Malcom Fletcher's witness statements, he states that prior to him receiving the anshuzt rifle, (DRH/15), batch of crime scene bullets and spent cartridge cases, and the 27 control rounds (DRH/42), on the 20th September 1985, and he proceeding to carry out test firing of the same, with comparison tests between crime ammunition and control ammunition, that he did not know when had been the last occasion that the anshuzt rifle had been fired!!

Liar! Liar! Liar!!

Where is the proof that Fletcher has lied regarding this matter, and more importantly why would Fletcher tell such a deliberate lie unless he did not want it made known that he had test fired the anshuzt rifle with at least two of the 29 control rounds either on or prior to the 12th September 1985? Examination of the lab' 'General Examination Records' pertaining to comparison tests which took place nvolving crime scene ammunition, and control ammunition' between 12th and 19th September, 1985, bear Fletcher's signatures which he also dates prior to 20th September, 1985!!

Fletcher there knew that the anshuzt rifle must have last been fired either on, or prior to the 12th September 1985, when the first comparison tests between crime scene ammo', and control ammo', took place!!!

Bingo!!!



"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Fletcher has lied about the dates some of the crime scene ammunition has been compared against control ammunition, either side of 20th September 1985! He claims he only performed such tests post 20th September 1985, but there exists clear evidence that he test fired the anshuzt rifle, with control rounds either on, or before 12 the September, 1985!!
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079

Dodgy Comparison tests

Spent Cartridge Cases

(1) DRH/4 - 13 September 1985
(2) DRH/19 - 18 September 1985
(3) DRH/20 - 18 September 1985
(4) DRH/35a - 13 September 1985
(5) DRH/35b - 13 September 1985
(6) DRH/37 - 18 September 1985
(7) DRH/38 - 18 September 1985
(8) DRH/46 - 13 September 1985
(9) DRH/41 - 13 September 1985
(10) DRH/43 - 13 September 1985


_______________________
20th September 1985

_______________________

Official Comparison tests

(11) DRH/1 - 20 September 1985
(12) DRH/2 - 20 September 1985
(13) DRH/3 - 20 September 1985
(14) DRH/6 - 20 September 1985
(15) DRH/7a - 20 September 1985
(16) DRH/7b - 20 September 1985
(17) DRH/8 - 20 September 1985
(18) DRH/10 - 20 September 1985
(19) DRH/11 - 20 September 1985
(20) DRH/12 - 20 September 1985
(21) DRH/13 - 20 September 1985
(22) DRH/14 - 20 September 1985
(23) DRH/16 - 20 September 1985
(24) DRH/17 - 20 September 1985
(25) DRH/18 - 20 September 1985
« Last Edit: March 15, 2017, 09:49:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
10 dodgy bullet cases, and 10 bullets, part bullet, or fragments of a bullet that cannot be positively linked to having been fired via the anshuzt rifle!!
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
10 dodgy bullet cases, and 10 bullets, part bullet, or fragments of a bullet that cannot be positively linked to having been fired via the anshuzt rifle!!

At least one bullet (the original badly fragmented PV/20) swapped with a whole control round, so that in total 11 dodgy bullet casings, and one dodgy bullet!!
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...