Police interview: Bamber instantly accepted a window could be banged shut.

[Adam]

Bamber said he was not aware there were any windows that could be banged shut from outside. Although he said he knew how to get in and out of several windows. Whether they were locked or unlocked.

The police then said Julie had told them about a window that could be banged shut from outside. Bamber said he 'didn't think' he had told her about this. The police asked him what he meant by 'didn't think' if he was unaware of such a window.

It has since been proven that Julie was correct and such a window exists.

Again Bamber instantly accepted to the police there was a window which could be banged shut from outside. He didn't ask which one, or for proof of this or claim the window had been tampered with.   

Julie didn't live at WHF & visited Bamber at his cottage. The only way she would know about such a window was from Bamber. This was a potential trump card for Bamber. He could claim Julie wouldn't know about such a window and is making it up. Or claim someone else told her about it. He didn't because he knew the window existed and  he had told her about it. He also knew the police would check the window as well.   

Do other people believe that Bamber instantly accepting there was a window which could be banged shut from outside shows guilt ?

[David1819]

Again Bamber instantly accepted to the police there was a window which could be banged shut from outside.

Oh dear.

[David1819]

It has since been proven that Julie was correct and such a window exists.

Indeed. And who decided Jeremy entered via that window before Julie "came forward" 

[mike tesko]

Bamber said he was not aware there were any windows that could be banged shut from outside. Although he said he knew how to get in and out of several windows. Whether they were locked or unlocked.

The police then said Julie had told them about a window that could be banged shut from outside. Bamber said he 'didn't think' he had told her about this. The police asked him what he meant by 'didn't think' if he was unaware of such a window.

It has since been proven that Julie was correct and such a window exists.

Again Bamber instantly accepted to the police there was a window which could be banged shut from outside. He didn't ask which one, or for proof of this or claim the window had been tampered with.   

Julie didn't live at WHF & visited Bamber at his cottage. The only way she would know about such a window was from Bamber. This was a potential trump card for Bamber. He could claim Julie wouldn't know about such a window and is making it up. Or claim someone else told her about it. He didn't because he knew the window existed and  he had told her about it. He also knew the police would check the window as well.   

Do other people believe that Bamber instantly accepting there was a window which could be banged shut from outside shows guilt ?

This is like something out of psychic detectives - how utterly coincidental that Robert Boutflour and his peers should have been advocating entry and exit via a window at the farmhouse, and lo and behold this act was followed by Mugsy Mugford! How come there was no forensic evidence say of blood from one or other of the victims anywhere on or around that window? None, because nobody climbed in, or out at the time of the shootings!! Mugford may have been asked by Stan Jones about the possibility of such a window based on what relatives told police about, that's how it mentions a window in the typed composite statement created for her by Stan Jones!

[Adam]

Oh dear.

That's what my thread post says.

Bamber knew several ways in & out of WHF windows. Locked or unlocked. But claimed he didn't know a window could be banged shut.

However he didn't dispute that Julie knew that a window existed which could be banged shut from outside. But was unsure whether he had told her about it.