Author Topic: In Conversation .......  (Read 10433 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: In Conversation .......
« Reply #75 on: March 10, 2017, 12:23:PM »



In YOUR mind,perhaps.

Lookout, you are far to biased to debate with - that lovely boy will always be innocent to you no matter what. You keep living in your dream world.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: In Conversation .......
« Reply #76 on: March 10, 2017, 12:24:PM »
Requested-------2 ambulances.One for immediate,one for standby ? 06.25. ( someone would have been alive at that point )

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: In Conversation .......
« Reply #77 on: March 10, 2017, 12:25:PM »
Requested-------2 ambulances.One for immediate,one for standby ? 06.25. ( someone would have been alive at that point )

Desperate!  ::)
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: In Conversation .......
« Reply #78 on: March 10, 2017, 12:43:PM »
Lookout, you are far to biased to debate with - that lovely boy will always be innocent to you no matter what. You keep living in your dream world.




Biased ? And what are you,then ? Lovely boy ? Grow up and get real.  ::)

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: In Conversation .......
« Reply #79 on: March 10, 2017, 12:47:PM »



Biased ? And what are you,then ? Lovely boy ? Grow up and get real.  ::)

What am I? A lot more open minded than you given that I have looked at both sides and argued from both sides. You don't like admitting you're WRONG so would stick to innocent even if he admitted it. You talk about him as though he were a naive, innocent, little boy - he's been in the nick for over 30 years, he's anything but!
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: In Conversation .......
« Reply #80 on: March 10, 2017, 12:55:PM »
Desperate!  ::)




I know you are.Hence all the snide jibes after everyone's posts.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: In Conversation .......
« Reply #81 on: March 10, 2017, 12:57:PM »



I know you are.Hence all the snide jibes after everyone's posts.

No, just yours and Jackie's.

Here is one of my posts telling Bambergate he was wrong - unlike some, I was never a fan http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,5290.msg228227.html#msg228227
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: In Conversation .......
« Reply #82 on: March 10, 2017, 01:07:PM »
No, just yours and Jackie's.

Here is one of my posts telling Bambergate he was wrong - unlike some, I was never a fan http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,5290.msg228227.html#msg228227




Oh dear,just because we have different views to you-----------as I said,grow up,unless of course you ARE a teenager then spite and b********s goes with the territory and you have a lot to learn. One never can tell who is on the other end of posts. Thank God I never believe who folk say they are.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33771
Re: In Conversation .......
« Reply #83 on: March 10, 2017, 02:23:PM »



Oh dear,just because we have different views to you-----------as I said,grow up,unless of course you ARE a teenager then spite and b********s goes with the territory and you have a lot to learn. One never can tell who is on the other end of posts. Thank God I never believe who folk say they are.

Forgive me if I'm wrong, but didn't you say, only yesterday, that because you practice what you believe is the bible's meaning of humility, it enables you to accept people for who they are and rise above what you believe to be their shortcomings and deficiencies?

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: In Conversation .......
« Reply #84 on: March 10, 2017, 03:03:PM »



Oh dear,just because we have different views to you-----------as I said,grow up,unless of course you ARE a teenager then spite and b********s goes with the territory and you have a lot to learn. One never can tell who is on the other end of posts. Thank God I never believe who folk say they are.

No, actually it's because you both post things that have no basis in fact. You read something and as long as it's favourable to Jeremy Bamber, you post it - when it's pointed out to you that it isn't true or you're asked to post proof, you take the huff, become personal and never provide evidence. I have given up trying have a sensible debate with you and can understand why others have given up in the past. I really don't care what you believe, I'm glad we're now on opposite sides of the fence because I couldn't defend anything you post with any real confidence. I'm not a teenager nor am I a bitter old woman. I have no idea what the edited part of the above post says - nor to I care.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Reader

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2456
Re: In Conversation .......
« Reply #85 on: March 10, 2017, 08:13:PM »
Cops accepted that Jeremy's call to PC West was originally recorded on Audio tape, but have subsequently claimed it was destroyed after 28 days!
The police may well have said that certain audio recordings may be destroyed or recorded over after 28 days, but I've seen nothing that shows they accepted that an audio recording was made of Jeremy's call to Pc West.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: In Conversation .......
« Reply #86 on: March 14, 2017, 03:16:PM »
The police may well have said that certain audio recordings may be destroyed or recorded over after 28 days, but I've seen nothing that shows they accepted that an audio recording was made of Jeremy's call to Pc West.

Existence of CAG/2 and CAG/3...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline lebaleb

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 884
Re: In Conversation .......
« Reply #87 on: March 26, 2017, 10:06:AM »
Lookout, this just won't wash - Bonnett (like it or not) made a distinction between 'Farm' and 'House'. He wasn' talking about the same thing or person when he made that distinction.

It is not the use of 'Farm' or 'House' that is informative. It's the word 'From'.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33771
Re: In Conversation .......
« Reply #88 on: March 26, 2017, 10:11:AM »
It is not the use of 'Farm' or 'House' that is informative. It's the word 'From'.

But he didn't say "IN" the house/farm.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: In Conversation .......
« Reply #89 on: March 26, 2017, 12:16:PM »
It is not the use of 'Farm' or 'House' that is informative. It's the word 'From'.

And Jeremy was FROM the farm. But it's the distinction between FARM and HOUSE that is the key!
Few people have the imagination for reality