Facts

[Caroline]

Except Ann had already identified Jeremy as a threat to their livelihood, prior to the killings. I think she informed 'dad and Peter' of the potential threat? They haven't exactly gone in to immediate post-killings period with an open mind have they?

I don't think she identified him as a threat exactly? He wound her up and and took pleasure in it. The fact that she took her livelihood seriously and he as a bit of a joke, speaks volumes. She didn't like some of the things he said, one of them being that they would both soon be in charge of Osea - in retrospect, I guess that was a pretty chilling for her. As far as an open mind goes, they knew the characters involved and we don't - they clearly had reason to suspect him.

[Stephanie]

Except Ann had already identified Jeremy as a threat to their livelihood, prior to the killings. I think she informed 'dad and Peter' of the potential threat? They haven't exactly gone in to immediate post-killings period with an open mind have they?

Hi Roch. Can you point me to where AE had already identified Jeremy as a threat to their livelihood, prior to the killings as I'd like to go further with this aspect with you.

Dr Jane Monckton Smith says there are often already signs regarding the offender and you appear to be suggesting the relatives had indeed recognised these signs. Though they obviously didn't recogonise he was a danger to his immediate family members. http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,8069.0.html

[Roch]

I'm posting from my phone. Just wrote a big reply only for it to be wiped out unexpectedly with all text lost. I'll post later on from laptop if I have chance

[Jane]

I don't think she identified him as a threat exactly? He wound her up and and took pleasure in it. The fact that she took her livelihood seriously and he as a bit of a joke, speaks volumes. She didn't like some of the things he said, one of them being that they would both soon be in charge of Osea - in retrospect, I guess that was a pretty chilling for her. As far as an open mind goes, they knew the characters involved and we don't - they clearly had reason to suspect him.

THIS is exactly the position from where the major problem stems. Ann -and David- had to work. Not for them the 'luxury' of boarding school followed by 'time out'. They left state schools and after enough college time to earn skills, were put to work at the family business. Neither Sheila nor Jeremy were required to do this. They had a wonderful financial cushion which guaranteed them a soft landing. Of COURSE the didn't take seriously, earning money. They had the bank of family to prop them up. Jeremy -and Sheila- appear to have had a rather frivolous view of work life. They probably thought it was to earn pocket money. That attitude didn't make for good boss material when it was her family's livelihood which stood to be gambled on.

[David1819]

The relatives thought Bamber was guilty from day one.

They found a silencer when at WHF with Basil Cock & BW. The silencer was tested and together with a mountain of other forensic and circumstantial evidence, helped convict Bamber.

There is nothing else to it.

Adam. Iv often wondered where this "mountain of forensic evidence" of yours is located. lo and behold  its in your "Library of incriminating evidence" how could I have missed it all this time?



2x Zoom


10x Zoom


200x Zoom


1000x Zoom


10,000x Zoom. - Glorious!