80 point timeline (attributed to JBCampaign)

[Stephanie]

Where? 

When you are ready to acknowledge it, it's all there David, including in the ramblings of a mad womenas you perceive it.

[Adam]

Depends what is referred to as 'immediately' with Julie. A month is quite quickly. Considering she was Bamber's girlfriend and he would have spent effort discouraging Julie from doing anything.

There are also lots of reasons why Julie waited a month. Thread created.

Chris Huhne's wife waited years before going to the police about his crime.

[lookout]

She was also charged with withholding information and so received her sentence too.

[lookout]

I'd love to have seen the looks on those officers faces as they asked JM for anything about her that they should know before making her a prosecution witness. Afterall,she was ALL EP had to help them secure a conviction. Shame on them all.

[Stephanie]

I'd love to have seen the looks on those officers faces as they asked JM for anything about her that they should know before making her a prosecution witness. Afterall,she was ALL EP had to help them secure a conviction. Shame on them all.

Turning Queens evidence isn't rare. At least she confessed to her wrong doings.

[JackiePreece]

It's already been proven in a court of law and indeed on this forum that Jeremy Bamber is guilty.

There was no call from Nevill. The facts are then when you are ready to see them Roch.

Ainsley didn't have any crucial evidence destroyed. It was Bamber who had crucial evidence destroyed; including the poor little dog. He knew exactly what he was doing when he agreed to having the carpets incinerated and that of his family members. 

People like Jeremy Bamber are clogging up the criminal justice system and in so doing are allowing genuinely innocent men and women to suffer because of their greed, omnipotence and psychopathy.

The knock on effect of the criminal behaviours of men like Bamber is far reaching Roch.

It's already been proven in a court of law and indeed on this forum that Jeremy Bamber is guilty.





As exactly it was proven in a court of law that the Guildford four and Birmingham six were guilty

By your reason these people should still all locked up

How disgracefull

It has certainly not been proved on this forum Jeremy is guilty
It has certainly NOT been proved that Neville did not make a phone call

Caroline would you like to list the items special branch destroyed

[JackiePreece]

Stop focusing on me and focus on the case. The reason you are no further forward and haven't yet figured out Bamber to be guilty is because you are too wrapped up in everyone else; like me for example. Put your personal differences to one side and look at what is staring you in the face.

You are the very last person I would take advice from
This is a forum and I will post when you write absolute rubbish

The SH case must have had a catastrophic affect on prisoners fighting to have their convictions overturned

[lookout]

Turning Queens evidence isn't rare. At least she confessed to her wrong doings.

She didn't really have a choice Steph,or how would it have looked if JB had piped up about her, leaving everyone open-mouthed because of not knowing ?

[Stephanie]

She didn't really have a choice Steph,or how would it have looked if JB had piped up about her, leaving everyone open-mouthed because of not knowing ?

But what could he have said lookout?

[David1819]

When you are ready to acknowledge it, it's all there David, including in the ramblings of a mad womenas you perceive it.

Where is it? Show me 

[mike tesko]

So then you are relying on the timings given by the police? yes, the timings in the logs which were recorded contemporaneously. I have learned from personal experience that in real time, cops don't have the opportunity to fabricate evidence, unless they seek to withhold or conceal the contents of these logs. So yes, I am relying on the timed events of the logs which as I say are details recorded in real time. Set against this, are the contents of police witness statements and the mindset of the police at the time they make their witness statements... The same police you say stitched Bamber up? yes, same cops that were involved in the framing if Jeremy Bamber, correct...

Come on Mike! Stop doing this. There is nothing for me to stop doing, and everything for me to continue exposing the full extent of the corruption in this case. I cannot stand idly by and let an innocent person rot in prison for something he had not physically done. Essex police shot Sheila, they tampered with the silencer evidence, and they tampered with one of the two bullets recovered from Sheila's body. We also now know that Sheila's blood, and the red paint from the kitchen aga, were not found inside or upon the same silencer. Jeremy Bamber has not influenced me one little bit in reaching these conclusions, I have arrived at these conclusions using my own independent talent. Jeremy did not shoot his sister dead in the main bedroom, or stage her body with the rifle from the box room window, or anywhere else. But police did shoot her. They are responsible for killing her, and they are responsible for why the police message log version of the events does not match up with the police witness statement version of the events. Two bodies downstairs, with three bodies upstairs, does not sit well with the witness statement version which only has one body downstairs, four bodies upstairs. I know where my money lies if I were a gambling man... You are better than people like Jeremy Bamber!

Jeremy had access to the police logs prior to his trial. Why are you making excuses?No, he did not have access to these logs prior to his trial commencing - I should know this to be true because I was involved in trying to get some of the latest material released, along with other people who were part of our campaign...

It was Jeremy who let Jeremy down. No one else. He didn't let himself down, he didn't have a clue about what had really happened. These are traits of an innocent person. If he had known what we all now know, he would have used all this new material to support his defence during his trial, but he didn't...

[JackiePreece]

Depends what is referred to as 'immediately' with Julie. A month is quite quickly. Considering she was Bamber's girlfriend and he would have spent effort discouraging Julie from doing anything.

There are also lots of reasons why Julie waited a month. Thread created.

Chris Huhne's wife waited years before going to the police about his crime.

You are joking

I am talking about the moment JB 'said' I should have been an actor

She has lied and lied on numerous occasions

[JackiePreece]

Maybe it will be you who finally goes to the press with Bamber's guilt, when you realise you have been played?

Jeremy has never asked me for anything and I am far to intelligent to get played

[lookout]

But what could he have said lookout?

He could have opened up knowing what he knew about JM's past antics in which the prosecution would have been ill-prepared.

[Stephanie]

Jeremy has never asked me for anything and I am far to intelligent to get played

  okay 

Ha ha. You are one funny character that's for sure.