This video spends a lot of time discussing which relative found the silencer. Which is not important. The fact is it was found.
It then confirms that the jury at trial were told that the other relatives would be the beneficiaries of the estate, if Bamber was convicted. However "they were already rich in their own right and had no reason to lie".
It then mentions some land which Peter Eaton had apparently spoken to Neville about. Which PE was farming on and Nevill was planning to sell to property developers (apparently).
The video does not state what discussions went on between Nevill and PE. Or whether Nevill still planned to sell the land to property developers.
The video does not say how much the land was worth or whether it would have a large or minimal impact on relatives who were already wealthy.
The video does not say whether Bamber was aware of Nevill's discussions over this land, or aware Nevill owned the land. It does not say if Bamber would want to sell the land or allow PE to continue farming on it. PE and Bamber would not have spoken about this issue after the massacre.
It then mentions Julie's NOTW deal which was agreed a year after the massacre. But does not mention Bamber's NOTW deal or attempts to sell pictures of Sheila.
There is no possibility the relatives would frame an innocent man of killing 5 members of his own family for such a flimsy reason. To do so for strong reasons would still take extreme bravery, callousness and expertise.
Is there something being missed here. Or is it really being suggested that the relatives who were already wealthy, framed an innocent man of killing 5 members of his own family. Over some land PE was farming on, which may or may not have been valuble, and may or may not have been sold to property developers in the future ?
