** Warning ** Beware of Jeremy Bamber!!

[Stephanie]

Which reminds me; the altruistic narcissist... the gift that keeps on giving... 

Another weapon in a psychopaths arsenal.

Altruistic Narcissists are sometimes difficult to spot. Their display of generosity and charitable behaviors often fool people into thinking that they are genuinely giving or supportive without needing to take credit. Here in lies the difference between individuals who do altruistic acts over Altruistic Narcissists:  Altruistic narcissists do all that they do for others, in order to be able to proclaim it to others or to feel self-important.

[maggie]

Well not all of us have studied psychology at university Caroline and find many of her posts tough meat to digest. In one of the recent posts it was mentioned Simon Hall was adopted-how about some parallels with Bamber there instead of an obsession with the idealize, devalue and discard jargon, which certainly did not apply to Bamber and Sue Ford. Stephanie has created her own thread on Simon Hall anyway and her comments should be confined to that thread.

Hi Steve, if Stephanie is discussing Simon Hall of course her posts should be confined to the SH thread but when she is discussing Jeremy Bamber but using Simon Hall as an example I believe she has every right to post on a JB thread.

[Stephanie]

idealize, devalue and discard jargon, which certainly did not apply to Bamber and Sue Ford.

And can you explain how Bamber did not idealise, devalue and discard Sue Ford; because I don't agree with you.

[Steve_uk]

Hi Steve, if Stephanie is discussing Simon Hall of course her posts should be confined to the SH thread but when she is discussing Jeremy Bamber but using Simon Hall as an example I believe she has every right to post on a JB thread.

But the posts appear disjointed and disconnected from the Jeremy Bamber case. I doubt many members have learned very much during Stephanie's time here.

[guest7363]

Hi Steve, if Stephanie is discussing Simon Hall of course her posts should be confined to the SH thread but when she is discussing Jeremy Bamber but using Simon Hall as an example I believe she has every right to post on a JB thread.

I agree Maggie, I have found it very interesting reading, how Steph links the mind and mindset of SH with Bamber.  The guy we have just had dealings with is very similar in his letter writing and answers, coupled with his lies.

[Steve_uk]

And can you explain how Bamber did not idealise, devalue and discard Sue Ford; because I don't agree with you.

I'm very willing to put you straight on the matter. Sue Ford might have started out as any young man's fantasy: a pretty blonde with a great figure who looked his way and seemed to be available for sex. That's how it started out. But Jeremy matured through his relationship with her and began to realize that there was more to sex and women than a good roll in the sack-he met her two children, bought them presents and built Lego with them. If you can't understand how devastated he was that June would never have welcomed her into the family and the double loss of the miscarriages of his children, then the blow when she told him she was reuniting with her husband then you will never understand the tragedy which was White House Farm.

[maggie]

But the posts appear disjointed and disconnected from the Jeremy Bamber case. I doubt many members have learned very much during Stephanie's time here.

Hi Steve
Everyone is allowed to express their point of view on the forum as long as it isn't personally abusive and/or offensive.
I am aware some posters are not particularly happy with some recent  posts but I'm afraid the reasons for objections do not convince me to take any action.
However, personal abuse is never acceptable on the forum and will always be edited whoever is the source of such abuse.