0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quite right there is proof on here, I think that is why, under no pressure, more and more people have changed from innocent to guilty.
I think the allegation might be the note was started before the Wednesday morning and added to continually, though to my mind it does look like the ramblings of an individual from one session. Not sure where the table in her bedroom fits in though, unless we're back to the lounge or kitchen.
A lot who thought Bamber innocent said Daisy did not exist or didn't want it to be true, but Aunt Agatha pointed out that Daisy did exist, all she was doing was trying to warn other people Sami. Like you said poor Daisy.
There seems to be some confusion here (deliberate or not), the handwritten note described a illegible is (I am sure) this one .... It is described as being found of Sheila's dressing table and has reference number DRH/42. It makes more sense for this note to be described as 'illegible' as the others may be difficult to read but they are not illegible. You post about the medium makes sense with the above in mind.
yea thanks when i need advice on manners i will ask you.as for getting to know you .i decline your invitation no offence.good night
http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,197.0.html
I agree there is confusion. But at one point on an evidence list there was suicide note listed. What would make them think that was a suicide note? As usual EP are the cause of doubt by their record keeping.
Another reference to the suicide note below (apparently found by Hammersley) and referenced as DRH/42 (the note above). Campion suggests that he was given this information by the 'consultancy campaign' - if this is the campaign team, then they know which note was on the bedside table. http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,2205.msg67559.html#msg67559
Didn't Campion start another thread on the alleged suicide note if my memory serves me well?