Most on here are guilters.

[Jane]

It is most definitely based on the palm print, I've read it and yes, common courtesy would have been to acknowledge that fact. Instead David chose to goad knowing full well that he had used the palm print for the basis of his little report. Had he not don't that, I'd have been none the wiser but this comment gave it away!

I did find out and I am laughing - AT YOU -  because you weren't quite as clever and you were underhanded!

Caroline, I TOTALLY understand where you're coming from. Two or three years back I did a psych profile of an historical figure. I was approached by an author who asked if I'd mind if she used it in a forthcoming book. I was delighted that she wanted to use it. A few weeks back my words were read out on a television programme about 'my' person. Had my permission not been sought, I'd have been truly pxxxxd off.

[David1819]

It is most definitely based on the palm print, I've read it and yes, common courtesy would have been to acknowledge that fact. Instead David chose to goad knowing full well that he had used the palm print for the basis of his little report. Had he not don't that, I'd have been none the wiser but this comment gave it away!

Again poking accusations while my hands are tied. Your just bitter that I worked out what you didn't and my methods surpassed yours. get over it

I did find out and I am laughing - AT YOU -  because you weren't quite as clever and you were underhanded!

Not as much as I am laughing AT YOU

"You have confirmed you have stolen my research by not denying it, if this wasn't what you are claiming to be NEW evidence, you would have said so - you're BUSTED David and no amount of ranting can take away from that. Whatever you think of PH, there is a DETAILED account of MY research printed on pages 174-5. So you have found NOTHING"

"You took someone else's idea, passed it off as your own and have probably added your own slant but basically you have claimed it for you own - the WHOLE THING! -

"No one had discovered what you had"? But they HAD! Wonder that JB's lawyers will make of that"

[sami]

as ive said many times before but here goes.first the print has to be proved to belong to sheila and if it is than the doctor made a mistake .hardly enough to free jb.thinking out the box jb could have put a blooded hand of sheila on the bible.than for what ever reason cleaned the blood from the hand he used .why he would do that .one will have to ask him

[Jane]

Again poking accusations while my hands are tied. Your just bitter that I worked out what you didn't and my methods surpassed yours. get over it

Is that your way of admitting that it was Caroline's work you plagiarised?

[David1819]

The question of whose hand print you believe it to be is neither here nor there Lookout. The work David has chosen to pass off as his own seems not to have been so. I believe it's called plagiarism. He then goes on, like a gleeful child, rather than saying nothing, so confident that nothing can be done about it, to goad and taunt the person who was responsible for the original work and squeal like a stuck pig when that person, quite rightly, complains, saying it is they who should keep quiet.

Is that your way of admitting that it was Caroline's work you plagiarised?

If you want to make accusations Jane go ahead, I will only take note of them, then remind you of them once I vindicate myself. Like I am now with Caroline. Do you want the Christian Bale cringe or something else should the time come? 

[lookout]

The hand on the Bible was June's,a smaller hand than Sheila's.It was June who was more drenched in blood than any of them,because she was walking around with blood still flowing,nobody else was. Her blood at the sewing room window,her blood around where Sheila lay and her blood on the Bible.

[Jane]

If you want to make accusations Jane go ahead, I will only take note of them, then remind you of them once I vindicate myself. Like I am now with Caroline. Do you want the Christian Bale cringe or something else should the time come? 

I have no idea who is Christian Bale but it interests me that you use every opportunity to deflect from what you've done as opposed to taking responsibility for it.

[Jane]

The hand on the Bible was June's,a smaller hand than Sheila's.It was June who was more drenched in blood than any of them,because she was walking around with blood still flowing,nobody else was. Her blood at the sewing room window,her blood around where Sheila lay and her blood on the Bible.

Lookout, in this instance, I not remotely interested in whose palm print it is. My interest is in the ethics -or, rather, lack of- which David has displayed and gone on to taunt, brag and goad.

[sami]

The hand on the Bible was June's,a smaller hand than Sheila's.It was June who was more drenched in blood than any of them,because she was walking around with blood still flowing,nobody else was. Her blood at the sewing room window,her blood around where Sheila lay and her blood on the Bible.

yes lookout thats what i think.i cant understand why its breakthrough evidence

[guest7363]

If you want to make accusations Jane go ahead, I will only take note of them, then remind you of them once I vindicate myself. Like I am now with Caroline. Do you want the Christian Bale cringe or something else should the time come? 

How about the Full Monty?

[Caroline]

If you want to make accusations Jane go ahead, I will only take note of them, then remind you of them once I vindicate myself. Like I am now with Caroline. Do you want the Christian Bale cringe or something else should the time come? 

So you're saying it's not about the palm print? You know you can't deny it because you would have to lie out right and you can't because you know I KNOW it's about the palm print. The fact that you are so blatant is what makes you underhanded and your silly little gif files are just a distraction.

But here is one for you, sums you up!



You should think yourself lucky that I keep my word - I don't have to, I choose to because I made a promise. Keep pushing though and I might forget!

[Caroline]

Again poking accusations while my hands are tied. Your just bitter that I worked out what you didn't and my methods surpassed yours. get over it

Not as much as I am laughing AT YOU

"You have confirmed you have stolen my research by not denying it, if this wasn't what you are claiming to be NEW evidence, you would have said so - you're BUSTED David and no amount of ranting can take away from that. Whatever you think of PH, there is a DETAILED account of MY research printed on pages 174-5. So you have found NOTHING"

"You took someone else's idea, passed it off as your own and have probably added your own slant but basically you have claimed it for you own - the WHOLE THING! -

"No one had discovered what you had"? But they HAD! Wonder that JB's lawyers will make of that"

Like I said, keep pushing!  Your hands aren't tied, you just don't want everyone to knows it's about the palm print! 

[Caroline]

yes lookout thats what i think.i cant understand why its breakthrough evidence

It isn't.

[David1819]

I have no idea who is Christian Bale but it interests me that you use every opportunity to deflect from what you've done as opposed to taking responsibility for it.

Take responsibility for false accusations? Why should I do that?

Like I said, eventually I will upload my findings to the forum as they were written before anyone knew about it. Then the forum members can make their own minds up. Except in your case, as Caroline will probably be making your mind up for as usual 

[sami]

How about the Full Monty?