Most on here are guilters.

[David1819]

If YOU are being honest, why would that matter? After all, you say that the truth will emerge so it won't be egg on your face, will it? If it remains for the accuser to remain silent, I guess it's the end of all our court cases and from now on the defendant walks free.

I have told myself that enough times, but it still gets to me now and then.

[Jane]

I have told myself that enough times, but it still gets to me now and then.

From my own experience of your behaviour, it's become an obsession.

[lookout]

It's the guilters who are obsessed.
Ears to the ground waiting for the least bit of evidence for fear it's another string in the bow of innocence.Right,let's rip it to shreds before anyone's had chance to read about it. Don't dare it be in JB's favour or I'll have to put a stop to it somehow,like a row online and get rid of those who support JB.
Frantic ? I should say so. Scared ? yes,in case they run out of excuses that he's guilty.

Obsessive ? The many who've left speaks for itself.They were pig-sick of being drowned out by " obsessive " guilters whose demands that they were " right " got on everyone's wick.

[Jane]

It's the guilters who are obsessed.
Ears to the ground waiting for the least bit of evidence for fear it's another string in the bow of innocence.Right,let's rip it to shreds before anyone's had chance to read about it. Don't dare it be in JB's favour or I'll have to put a stop to it somehow,like a row online and get rid of those who support JB.
Frantic ? I should say so. Scared ? yes,in case they run out of excuses that he's guilty.

Obsessive ? The many who've left speaks for itself.They were pig-sick of being drowned out by " obsessive " guilters whose demands that they were " right " got on everyone's wick.

So you support David's behaviour, Lookout.

[guest154]

It's the guilters who are obsessed.
Ears to the ground waiting for the least bit of evidence for fear it's another string in the bow of innocence.Right,let's rip it to shreds before anyone's had chance to read about it. Don't dare it be in JB's favour or I'll have to put a stop to it somehow,like a row online and get rid of those who support JB.
Frantic ? I should say so. Scared ? yes,in case they run out of excuses that he's guilty.

Obsessive ? The many who've left speaks for itself.They were pig-sick of being drowned out by " obsessive " guilters whose demands that they were " right " got on everyone's wick.

There are plenty of excuses. But not from the guilters. You've excused Jeremy's behaviour many times because you're so far in the forest you can't see the wood for the trees.

I can't think of any supporters that have left because they were drowned out, both sides do a good job of putting their point across and always have done.

[lookout]

So you support David's behaviour, Lookout.

What behaviour ? If David's needled,like I've been at times, he will kick out because it's all so unnecessary over a blooming hand-print. Why the big deal ? It wasn't even Sheila's hand.Too small.
I don't read all posts either.If they're more than half a dozen lines,forget it,as it's probably all been said before.

[lookout]

There are plenty of excuses. But not from the guilters. You've excused Jeremy's behaviour many times because you're so far in the forest you can't see the wood for the trees.

I can't think of any supporters that have left because they were drowned out, both sides do a good job of putting their point across and always have done.

Mine aren't excuses. I support the man for God's sake----------you don't,so yes,you're going to make excuses against everything that comes from the CT to try and justify your reasons for finding him guilty

I can see plenty of wood believe me-----woodenhead guilters.

[David1819]

There are plenty of excuses. But not from the guilters. You've excused Jeremy's behaviour many times because you're so far in the forest you can't see the wood for the trees.

I can't think of any supporters that have left because they were drowned out, both sides do a good job of putting their point across and always have done.

Do you have an explanation for the absence of developed post mortem hypostasis in Sheila?

[Caroline]

Do you have an explanation for the absence of developed post mortem hypostasis in Sheila?

Do you have any evidence not including grainy pictures of June for comparison?

[guest154]

Do you have an explanation for the absence of developed post mortem hypostasis in Sheila?

I am not a medical examiner. The pictures on here aren't clear enough for anyone to start making claims as to anything like that. I've not seen the unedited original crime scene photos, or claimed to, but for every poster that says it is absent, there will be some that say it isn't.

[Jane]

What behaviour ? If David's needled,like I've been at times, he will kick out because it's all so unnecessary over a blooming hand-print. Why the big deal ? It wasn't even Sheila's hand.Too small.
I don't read all posts either.If they're more than half a dozen lines,forget it,as it's probably all been said before.

The question of whose hand print you believe it to be is neither here nor there Lookout. The work David has chosen to pass off as his own seems not to have been so. I believe it's called plagiarism. He then goes on, like a gleeful child, rather than saying nothing, so confident that nothing can be done about it, to goad and taunt the person who was responsible for the original work and squeal like a stuck pig when that person, quite rightly, complains, saying it is they who should keep quiet.

[David1819]

It's the guilters who are obsessed.
Ears to the ground waiting for the least bit of evidence for fear it's another string in the bow of innocence.Right,let's rip it to shreds before anyone's had chance to read about it. Don't dare it be in JB's favour or I'll have to put a stop to it somehow,like a row online and get rid of those who support JB.
Frantic ? I should say so. Scared ? yes,in case they run out of excuses that he's guilty.

Obsessive ? The many who've left speaks for itself.They were pig-sick of being drowned out by " obsessive " guilters whose demands that they were " right " got on everyone's wick.

Yes I totally agree lookout. They have turned the forum into a madhouse.

[David1819]

Do you have any evidence not including grainy pictures of June for comparison?

I have posted other examples yes. June's state resembles that of the others but Sheila does not.

[Caroline]

By saying that, you appear to be suggesting that your 'forensic breakthrough' is not about the hand print. That being the case, perhaps Caroline does owe you an apology. However, if the basis for said 'forensic breakthrough' IS the hand print it clearly follows that it originated from Caroline's work on this forum. You have questioned Caroline -in detail- re the hand print but have lacked the courtesy to acknowledge this. The outcome of such MAY be your own thought, however, the basis for it, WAS NOT.

It is most definitely based on the palm print, I've read it and yes, common courtesy would have been to acknowledge that fact. Instead David chose to goad knowing full well that he had used the palm print for the basis of his little report. Had he not don't that, I'd have been none the wiser but this comment gave it away!

You wont be laughing when you find out what it is 

I did find out and I am laughing - AT YOU -  because you weren't quite as clever and you were underhanded!

[Caroline]

I have posted other examples yes. June's state resembles that of the others but Sheila does not.

Her legs are covered in blood, it's a grainy pink toned photograph that makes for a poor comparison. But then you said you have official crime scene pictures that prove you point and that show the wet blood photograph to be kosher. Of course we haven't seen them