Author Topic: Why didn't Bamber put the silencer on prior to shooting rabbits ?  (Read 23694 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13780
Re: Why didn't Bamber put the silencer on prior to shooting rabbits ?
« Reply #165 on: August 29, 2016, 06:18:PM »

You're projecting ...............AGAIN

No Jane.

I put forward a premise followed by an array of evidence to support it.  Instead of challenging what I put forward, you resorted to attacking and smearing my character with the BS Caroline tells you.

« Last Edit: August 29, 2016, 06:20:PM by David1819 »

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33771
Re: Why didn't Bamber put the silencer on prior to shooting rabbits ?
« Reply #166 on: August 29, 2016, 06:34:PM »
No Jane.

I put forward a premise followed by an array of evidence to support it.  Instead of challenging what I put forward, you resorted to attacking and smearing my character with the BS Caroline tells you.

Yes, David, I'm rather afraid you are..................even down to accusing others of BS. The minutiae of your posts isn't of the slightest interest to me -I'm far more interested in the mind set of of someone who uses other peoples' work and claims credit for themselves. Your wish for me to challenge it I simply see as an attempt to deflect.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Why didn't Bamber put the silencer on prior to shooting rabbits ?
« Reply #167 on: August 29, 2016, 07:14:PM »
No Jane.

I put forward a premise followed by an array of evidence to support it.  Instead of challenging what I put forward, you resorted to attacking and smearing my character with the BS Caroline tells you.

You have posted the same thing over and over again. When you were challenged you didn't like it and claimed that you were given crime scene pictures which prove your point. You have failed to back up your claims so the smell BS is steaming in your corner.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33771
Re: Why didn't Bamber put the silencer on prior to shooting rabbits ?
« Reply #168 on: August 29, 2016, 07:28:PM »
You have posted the same thing over and over again. When you were challenged you didn't like it and claimed that you were given crime scene pictures which prove your point. You have failed to back up your claims so the smell BS is steaming in your corner.

As I see it, Caroline, NONE of this would have occurred had David resisted the urge to gloat about 'HIS' find. Whatever it is he believes himself to have found appears to have become embellished out of recognition, now reaching -and being supported by- the higher echelons. He's willing to brag about this whilst refusing to post what he believes he's discovered. Sadly the more he pushes the story that 'those in high places' are interested in 'his' work, taunting us with the story that he's been advised not to reveal it in case the opposition get hold of it, the less likely he is to be believed.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Why didn't Bamber put the silencer on prior to shooting rabbits ?
« Reply #169 on: August 29, 2016, 08:07:PM »
As I see it, Caroline, NONE of this would have occurred had David resisted the urge to gloat about 'HIS' find. Whatever it is he believes himself to have found appears to have become embellished out of recognition, now reaching -and being supported by- the higher echelons. He's willing to brag about this whilst refusing to post what he believes he's discovered. Sadly the more he pushes the story that 'those in high places' are interested in 'his' work, taunting us with the story that he's been advised not to reveal it in case the opposition get hold of it, the less likely he is to be believed.

David didn't realise that someone would guess the gist of his 'forensic breakthrough' and thought he'd play the big I am and like you say 'taunt' various posters. The irony is, had he not done that to me, I wouldn't have guessed what it entailed. However, had he really been told not to reveal 'his' find, he wouldn't have mentioned it at all. I imagine the legal team wouldn't be too happy with the way this has played out. The drama of asking NGB to post on his behalf instead of just keeping quiet. He said he announced it to we could debate? Debate what? Given that he wasn't going to reveal what the report entailed, the only thing that could be debated is David's favourite subject - HIMSELF!

Since then, every opinion, assumption or idea he has, he treats as fact and we're 'unhinged' if we dare to question his posts. He knows the forum pictures are of poor quality and can't back up his claim that June was in a more developed stage of hypostasis so he decided to suggest that the legal team have given him official crime scene pictures, but once again, he can't reveal them. How convenient and coincidental. David doesn't believe in coincidences - well, when they involve David - NEITHER DO I!

Why would Jeremy's lawyers give David official crime scene pictures? This isn't a game to them!
« Last Edit: August 29, 2016, 08:09:PM by Caroline »
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Why didn't Bamber put the silencer on prior to shooting rabbits ?
« Reply #170 on: August 29, 2016, 08:24:PM »
Goodness me,he must be gloating all the more at the attention he's getting------just ignore him,he'll soon quieten down  ::) People like that don't bother me,they're just sad and childish.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13780
Re: Why didn't Bamber put the silencer on prior to shooting rabbits ?
« Reply #171 on: August 29, 2016, 08:29:PM »
David didn't realise that someone would guess the gist of his 'forensic breakthrough' and thought he'd play the big I am and like you say 'taunt' various posters. The irony is, had he not done that to me, I wouldn't have guessed what it entailed.

Yes Caroline, you really worked it all out! got the nail right on the head you did  ::)

"You have confirmed you have stolen my research by not denying it, if this wasn't what you are claiming to be NEW evidence, you would have said so - you're BUSTED David and no amount of ranting can take away from that. Whatever you think of PH, there is a DETAILED account of MY research printed on pages 174-5. So you have found NOTHING"

"You took someone else's idea, passed it off as your own and have probably added your own slant but basically you have claimed it for you own - the WHOLE THING! -





The drama of asking NGB to post on his behalf instead of just keeping quiet. He said he announced it to we could debate? Debate what? !

The only drama was you turning into one. had I realised how unhinged some members on here are, I would have said nothing.

It was agreed that it would spur more life into the forum, and that it has 

Why would Jeremy's lawyers give David official crime scene pictures? This isn't a game to them!

Why have you assumed I got them from lawyers? I think your bacon detector has got it wrong again
« Last Edit: August 29, 2016, 08:32:PM by David1819 »

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
Re: Why didn't Bamber put the silencer on prior to shooting rabbits ?
« Reply #172 on: August 29, 2016, 08:38:PM »
Goodness me,he must be gloating all the more at the attention he's getting------just ignore him,he'll soon quieten down  ::) People like that don't bother me,they're just sad and childish.
well said lookout :)

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13780
Re: Why didn't Bamber put the silencer on prior to shooting rabbits ?
« Reply #173 on: August 29, 2016, 08:42:PM »
You have posted the same thing over and over again. When you were challenged you didn't like it and claimed that you were given crime scene pictures which prove your point. You have failed to back up your claims so the smell BS is steaming in your corner.

What challenge? You realised there was no developed post mortem hypostasis in Sheila, So you then tried to find a reason for it other than her being dead for under three hours, Since that failed miserably all you can do now come up with a pathetic excuse about the picture quality.


Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Why didn't Bamber put the silencer on prior to shooting rabbits ?
« Reply #174 on: August 29, 2016, 08:53:PM »
What challenge? You realised there was no developed post mortem hypostasis in Sheila, So you then tried to find a reason for it other than her being dead for under three hours, Since that failed miserably all you can do now come up with a pathetic excuse about the picture quality.

Nothing of the sort, Sheila has hypostasis and you can see it on her face . the picture quality is rubbish and you know it, which is why you invented having access to official crime scene pictures - pathetic!
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Why didn't Bamber put the silencer on prior to shooting rabbits ?
« Reply #175 on: August 29, 2016, 09:02:PM »
Yes Caroline, you really worked it all out! got the nail right on the head you did  ::)

"You have confirmed you have stolen my research by not denying it, if this wasn't what you are claiming to be NEW evidence, you would have said so - you're BUSTED David and no amount of ranting can take away from that. Whatever you think of PH, there is a DETAILED account of MY research printed on pages 174-5. So you have found NOTHING"

"You took someone else's idea, passed it off as your own and have probably added your own slant but basically you have claimed it for you own - the WHOLE THING! -





The only drama was you turning into one. had I realised how unhinged some members on here are, I would have said nothing.

It was agreed that it would spur more life into the forum, and that it has 

Why have you assumed I got them from lawyers? I think your bacon detector has got it wrong again

Ha, ha! You must have felt sick when I guess it was about the hand print.

Spur life into the forum? Don't make me laugh  ;D ;D ;D ;D! How would it if you couldn't discuss the contents? You wanted it to be all about you!!

Oh, I see 'they' won't trust you any more if you reveal the crime scene pictures. I guess 'they' don't read this forum to see you drop hints about whoever 'they' are. You only mentioned having 'special pictures' because you know the forum pictures show squat!
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Why didn't Bamber put the silencer on prior to shooting rabbits ?
« Reply #176 on: August 29, 2016, 09:05:PM »
Goodness me,he must be gloating all the more at the attention he's getting------just ignore him,he'll soon quieten down  ::) People like that don't bother me,they're just sad and childish.

You are of course right Lookout  ;D
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
Re: Why didn't Bamber put the silencer on prior to shooting rabbits ?
« Reply #177 on: August 29, 2016, 09:15:PM »
if any blooded print is found than it must first be proved it belongs to sheila.even if it is hers that will not automatically free jb,it will be put down as a mistake made by the doctor when saying no blood was on her palms,much like the shadow at the window the mistake in the timings of the calls.so nothing to get excited about ;D i must add it wouldnt be hard for jb to place sheila's hand on the bible if it is hers
« Last Edit: August 29, 2016, 09:18:PM by sami »

Offline Romeo

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 319
Re: Why didn't Bamber put the silencer on prior to shooting rabbits ?
« Reply #178 on: August 29, 2016, 09:43:PM »
Nothing of the sort, Sheila has hypostasis and you can see it on her face . the picture quality is rubbish and you know it, which is why you invented having access to official crime scene pictures - pathetic!

Yes Caroline I agree that Sheila has got hypostasis! That's why David only shows the 'legs' of Sheila and NOT her right arm/shoulder where you can clearly see hypostasis 

Offline Romeo

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 319
Re: Why didn't Bamber put the silencer on prior to shooting rabbits ?
« Reply #179 on: August 29, 2016, 09:50:PM »
And her face!  Oh and perhaps David has forgotten so I'll say it again...... Sheila falling onto her front when shot could be the reason Hypostasis set in where it is....it could also be the fact that she was moved after death therefore distributing hypostasis to different parts of her body.