Author Topic: Why didn't Bamber put the silencer on prior to shooting rabbits ?  (Read 23723 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Why didn't Bamber put the silencer on prior to shooting rabbits ?
« Reply #150 on: August 29, 2016, 10:52:AM »
Brilliant post, Romeo!!! Interesting that he makes use of "unhinged" when the only useful thing he has in his arsenal appears to be a library of silly pictures which he trolls out ad nauseum.

TROLLS is right. He doesn't need anyone to blacken his character, he's doing a pretty good self assassination by all the weird behaviour!
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Why didn't Bamber put the silencer on prior to shooting rabbits ?
« Reply #151 on: August 29, 2016, 11:18:AM »
I personally wouldn't worry folks,as me and my" telepathic abilities " just sees an immature person who doesn't know the meaning of diplomacy and he certainly wouldn't pass any exam if it involved any Intelligence organisation.


" Don't tell him your name, Pike ". ::)

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
Re: Why didn't Bamber put the silencer on prior to shooting rabbits ?
« Reply #152 on: August 29, 2016, 11:49:AM »
If shooting two head bullets into the twins, then 8 head bullets into Neville and June, that should have been sufficient.

There would only be one bullet left, but his aim was to kill Sheila with one bullet.

So no need to carry extra bullets with him.
yes ive changed my stance now ,thanks adam.its the best thing about the forum you can come here with one theory and believe it until someone comes out with a theory that sounds more likely than your own.its a learning process for me :)

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44291
Re: Why didn't Bamber put the silencer on prior to shooting rabbits ?
« Reply #153 on: August 29, 2016, 03:00:PM »
yes ive changed my stance now ,thanks adam.its the best thing about the forum you can come here with one theory and believe it until someone comes out with a theory that sounds more likely than your own.its a learning process for me :)

It's good when people assist each other on here. From either side.

Supporters recently assisted me in believing that perhaps Bamber did shoot two bullets into the twins first.

However the recent threads on Sheila's accomplice, Bamber  entering WHF through Neville and Junes small upstairs bedroom window, Bamber not 'lobbing Julie overboard' and RWB putting his own blood into the silencer,  have not made me change my guilty stance.

I await Trudie's next vlog.
« Last Edit: August 29, 2016, 03:04:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13780
Re: Why didn't Bamber put the silencer on prior to shooting rabbits ?
« Reply #154 on: August 29, 2016, 03:28:PM »
Brilliant post, Romeo!!! Interesting that he makes use of "unhinged" when the only useful thing he has in his arsenal appears to be a library of silly pictures which he trolls out ad nauseum.

Silly pictures? How about photographic evidence of the man's innocence? Very useful if you ask me. The only thing in your arsenal is denial.





« Last Edit: August 29, 2016, 03:32:PM by David1819 »

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33771
Re: Why didn't Bamber put the silencer on prior to shooting rabbits ?
« Reply #155 on: August 29, 2016, 03:35:PM »
Silly pictures? How about photographic evidence of the man's innocence? Very useful if you ask me. The only thing in your arsenal is denial.






But I have no desire to promote myself or my achievements at the expense of others. There appears to be no depths to which you won't sink to achieve your aim.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Why didn't Bamber put the silencer on prior to shooting rabbits ?
« Reply #156 on: August 29, 2016, 03:53:PM »
Silly pictures? How about photographic evidence of the man's innocence? Very useful if you ask me. The only thing in your arsenal is denial.







Not this again!  ;D ;D ;D ;D
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Why didn't Bamber put the silencer on prior to shooting rabbits ?
« Reply #157 on: August 29, 2016, 03:56:PM »

But I have no desire to promote myself or my achievements at the expense of others. There appears to be no depths to which you won't sink to achieve your aim.

Can't see any official crime scene pics here - just the grainy pictures in the archives. Particularly bad picture of June! You can't determine what the marks on her legs are because of the high red content, could be blood from her wounds shadow or lividity but because the picture is distorted, even if it was lividity, you can't determine the extent due to picture quality.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13780
Re: Why didn't Bamber put the silencer on prior to shooting rabbits ?
« Reply #158 on: August 29, 2016, 03:58:PM »
Not this again!   :o :o :o

Sorry Caroline. but yes this again. I know its very inconvenient for you

« Last Edit: August 29, 2016, 03:59:PM by David1819 »

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Why didn't Bamber put the silencer on prior to shooting rabbits ?
« Reply #159 on: August 29, 2016, 04:03:PM »
Sorry Caroline. but yes this again. I know its very inconvenient for you



Inconvenient? I laugh every time you post it. Is there no end to your claims?

Forensic expert
Psychology expert
Mortician
Ballistics expert
Trusted member of the legal team
Expert bullshitter!

Only one of these is true, I wonder if the other members can guess which one?
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Why didn't Bamber put the silencer on prior to shooting rabbits ?
« Reply #160 on: August 29, 2016, 04:05:PM »
This is what you're doing but you seem to have a need to project!

Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33771
Re: Why didn't Bamber put the silencer on prior to shooting rabbits ?
« Reply #161 on: August 29, 2016, 04:15:PM »
Sorry Caroline. but yes this again. I know its very inconvenient for you



Be interesting to watch just how much further you're able to project.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13780
Re: Why didn't Bamber put the silencer on prior to shooting rabbits ?
« Reply #162 on: August 29, 2016, 04:54:PM »

But I have no desire to promote myself or my achievements at the expense of others. There appears to be no depths to which you won't sink to achieve your aim.


Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33771
Re: Why didn't Bamber put the silencer on prior to shooting rabbits ?
« Reply #163 on: August 29, 2016, 04:58:PM »



You're projecting ...............AGAIN

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
Re: Why didn't Bamber put the silencer on prior to shooting rabbits ?
« Reply #164 on: August 29, 2016, 06:11:PM »
Inconvenient? I laugh every time you post it. Is there no end to your claims?

Forensic expert
Psychology expert
Mortician
Ballistics expert
Trusted member of the legal team
Expert bullshitter!

Only one of these is true, I wonder if the other members can guess which one?
is it number 6 caroline  :)) :)) :))