0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
It does but if your actually read the sentences in their entirety and not just a word. lacking other elements of judgment, such as• rigor mortis• body temperature • External hypostasis These were not areas they explored.The one you are going by is a copy of a copy. Look at the colour of the carpet in both photos, Their carpet was/is beige not dark grey and green I have seen an actual scan of the original photo, Its not enhanced at all.Jeremy is innocent, No matter how much bacon you could smell in those letters he wrote you.The glasses remain on
Keep those glasses on David !! ( said in a school-ma'amish tone )While I continue to slouch in my chair in a slovenly fashion-------which denotes confidence you see.
Confidence in what?
The translation of the document you posted is rubbish but I guess the above means that you 'think' you have succeeded where the professors have failed? I don't care what kind of scan you have seen, the photo is enhanced. EP will have copies of the actual crime scene photographs so peddling this picture on the internet will lead to nothing (as it has in the past). The picture I posted shows that the blood is dried and cracked and Sheila has clearly been dead for some time - how can she be bleeding from a wound having been dead long enough for the blood on her face to dry and turn black? Conveniently, the picture you claim is is more representative of the CS doesn't show Sheila's face, so we can't see the blood around her mouth - I wonder why? How did Sheila manage to kill 4 people without getting a single drop of blood from any of the victims or any residue from the gun on her person? He's guilty!
He is not. His letters to you could have smelled like a Texas double flame grilled rodeo with extra bacon! makes no difference. I don't know what planet you are on. But today on earth it's sunny. Good thing my glasses are on
So you can't answer any of those questions? Seems you've also done an about turn as far as Di Stephani goes too! Supporting his propaganda picture when even you have called him dodgy more than once!
No I have not. My position has always been that GDS should not be trusted unless there is other evidence to corroborate his work. Since the post mortem hypostasis corroborates the evidence he obtained from the Italian professors and now I know 100% that the photo is not enhanced as I have seen the whole thing with my own eyes, I have no reason to doubt GDS work in this respect. As for your question about Sheila apparently not getting blood from the victims on her, I have already answered this question before. I am not going to type it all out again and re upload the photos and studies I used just so you can make up excuses for them.
For you to have seen it with your own eyes, I guess you mean in person. Who showed you that photo in person?
davids breakthrough evidence
Really?
