It said FOR INSTANCE children and the elderly, not ONLY children and the elderly - this shows how dishonest you are and how your try and twist things to fit. I know what you have written and tried to pass of as fact (eve though it's just YOUR OPINION!) is rubbish.
That's rich coming from you! Your calling me dishonest and say I am twisting things?
Was it me that spread the lie about the photo's of Sheila's feet? NO it was YOU.
Was it me that tried to peddle JM as a credible witness knowing she was anything but? NO it was YOU.
Was it me who claimed a massive list of untainted circumstantial evidence against Jeremy exists? NO it was YOU.
Is it me that refuse to give straight answers as to why I hold the positions that I do? NO its YOU
Am I the one that reverses the burden of proof on those that disagree with me? NO its YOU
People may not take my word for it, but they should take the word of an expert
They don't use lividity to determine time of death and they certainly wouldn't use a grainy old picture with high pink tones to determine anything!
I agree lets take the word of an expert.
But I guess you wont accept the words below because you don't care about reality. Your belief in JBs guilt is like that of a religion, much like the Islamist's faith in Allah. Tila Tequila believes the earth is flat and showing her photographic of proof of it being otherwise does not stop her believing its flat. Guess the same applies to you on this subject
The time of death is sometimes extremely important. It is a question almost invariably asked by investigating officers, sometimes with a touching faith in the accuracy of the estimate. Determining the time of death is extremely difficult, and accuracy is impossible".
A recurring problem in forensic medicine is the need to fix the time of death within the limits of probability. It is self-evident that the longer the interval of time between death and the examination of the body, the wider will be the limits of probability.
Various methods have been tried to find out the time of death. These include study of physical, chemical, biochemical, histological and enzymatic changes which occur progressively in a dead body. Postmortem lividity is one of the physical changes useful for estimating time of death to a certain degree of accuracy.
Post-mortem lividity however, recently has received little serious attention reflected by the relative paucity of publications in this area. Much of what is known and written about the subject is in relation to gross observations on an anecdotal basis, with very few papers generated from properly designed studies1.
Post- mortem lividity is one of the important signs of death; it is also called the “darkening of death” because shortly after death, in from 20 minutes to 2 hours usually purple red blotches begin to appear in the skin. Within first 3-4 hours after death these livid blotches may be blanched out by pressure of the finger against the skin only to return when the finger is removed. After a vague, undefined length of time, when the blood hemolyses and stains the surrounding tissues by diffusion this maneuver cannot be repeated. The forensic significance of this change in the stability of the lividity is that if the position of the dead body has been changed after death but before lividity is fixed the findings of two different areas of distribution of lividity, such as in front and behind may serve as mute evidence that the body has been moved since death.2
Thus post-mortem lividity is very important in calculating time since death where other advanced techniques to determine time since death are not available. Therefore the present study is carried to know mechanism of formation and effect of factors affecting development of postmortem lividity in relation to determination of time since death, as it may be observed on all bodies, irrespective of cause of death and is seen although with difficulty even in deaths from hemorrhage.
MEDICOLEGAL SIGNIFICANCE OF POSTMORTEM LIVIDITY IN
DETERMINATION OF TIME SINCE DEATH
Anand P Rayamane
