Author Topic: Aftermath, Where is the forensic evidence that Jeremy Bamber killed his family?  (Read 32079 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline lebaleb

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 884
I think they were shot last with whatever was left in the rifle, which is why one was shot 5 times and the other only 3.

I doubt that Sheila was counting. There was a stray bullet in the bedroom indicating reloading went on there.

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490




Just testing. Ah,so you don't believe that professionals get it right all the time,even with one of the country's most publicised murders ? Doesn't say much of all those who were involved in the investigation does it,especially Vanezis the most " decorated " man ?
no human being gets it right every time impossible.his mistakes or carelessness was because like some others he believed jb's story

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
I doubt that Sheila was counting. There was a stray bullet in the bedroom indicating reloading went on there.

No but Jeremy was!
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13787
totally disagree .you have no PROOF what so ever the twins were killed first .because they were asleep they were shot first how do you work that out.its your opinion they were shot first.jb would not be messing about with the twins when 3 adults needed subduing

I have already explained to you why the twins died first, I have written this in detail before. Why repeat myself?

You apply the most senseless double standards. When you are shown anything that shows Jeremy did not commit the crime, you demand I show you an array of authoritative evidence and sources, once that is provided, you then find excuses not to accept it. However if someone spouts a few lines of ignorant half-baked reasons for why Jeremy did commit the crime, You cheerfully praise and accept it without question.  ::)

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13787
No but Jeremy was!

How about you stop yelling all these myopic one liners, and find a plausible explanation as to how Sheila can have no developed post mortem hypostasis in her arms and legs after being dead for over 7 hours  ::)

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
How about you stop yelling all these myopic one liners, and find a plausible explanation as to how Sheila can have no developed post mortem hypostasis in her arms and legs after being dead for over 7 hours  ::)

She has.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
I have already explained to you why the twins died first, I have written this in detail before. Why repeat myself?

You apply the most senseless double standards. When you are shown anything that shows Jeremy did not commit the crime, you demand I show you an array of authoritative evidence and sources, once that is provided, you then find excuses not to accept it. However if someone spouts a few lines of ignorant half-baked reasons for why Jeremy did commit the crime, You cheerfully praise and accept it without question.  ::)
ive read your reasons and its utter nonsense .laughable.they were first because they were sleeping in their beds :)) :)) :)) :))

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
I doubt that Sheila was counting. There was a stray bullet in the bedroom indicating reloading went on there.
a stray bullet means there was reloading going on .how did you work that one out :)

Offline lebaleb

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 884
a stray bullet means there was reloading going on .how did you work that one out :)

How else would an un-fired bullet get into the twins room?

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Would JB have left an empty bullet box/container in the bedroom ? Was it fingerprinted ?
Why would JB have needed to have carried loose bullets ?

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13787

Offline Romeo

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 319
She has on her arm....and I don't mean the blood!

Offline Romeo

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 319
Here.....

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13787
Here.....

I don't know what you are seeing or where you are looking. But whatever it is its not postmortem lividity because it does not appear in just one isolated spot. it appears all over the body


Offline Romeo

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 319
Unless parts of the body are covered or pressed hard on a hard surface...then Livor Mortis does not appear  that's why in an early photo you put up you can see only parts of livor mortis on the man's back.

And I've explained to you that Sheila were not in the position we see her when livor moris appeared. The top side of her arms...now showing...was on the ground....hence livor mortis.

There is no need to keep showing me how livor mortis settles, just remember she wasn't on her back soon after death. Do you really believe Sheila's position shown doesn't look staged. It looks like she died perfectly straight! Only her head in an different angle, and the back of her nightdress is pulled up where she was positioned after death. If Sheila had shot herself twice the rifle would have fell away from her neck the same time she fell back.
« Last Edit: August 15, 2016, 12:22:AM by Romeo »