Author Topic: silencer evidence  (Read 19312 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
Re: silencer evidence
« Reply #120 on: June 17, 2016, 04:45:PM »




No,I'm not in any mood. It's the sort of thing that I put up with after replies of MOST of my posts. So now you know what it looks like.
not at all ,please feel free to continue :)

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: silencer evidence
« Reply #121 on: June 17, 2016, 07:32:PM »
In others words you have no list to make  ;D

No, I will be making a list, but it won't be made of bluff and dishonesty that is inherent in your posts. I wonder if we will get the same from you in respect to Sheila because her mental illness and a palm print on the bible is pathetic.















Even your hero thinks ......

« Last Edit: June 17, 2016, 07:39:PM by Caroline »
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13779
Re: silencer evidence
« Reply #122 on: June 17, 2016, 08:09:PM »
No, I will be making a list, but it won't be made of bluff and dishonesty that is inherent in your posts. I wonder if we will get the same from you in respect to Sheila because her mental illness and a palm print on the bible is pathetic.


Allot of My posts are based on scientific studies and I often paste the relevant parts in them, they are supported opinions. bluff and dishonesty would be like for example saying photos of Sheila's feet are not Sheila's feet ,, OH Wait!  ;D

instead of being evasive or answering the question with a question why not just focus on the "Massive List" of circumstancial evidence sans Julie Mugford  ;D

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13779
Re: silencer evidence
« Reply #123 on: June 17, 2016, 08:14:PM »
I read a book similar to that it's a true story called 'And the Sea Will Tell' - is it the case case? https://www.amazon.co.uk/Sea-Will-Tell-Vincent-Bugliosi/dp/0393327965

If anyone is interested here is a link to the FBI files documentary  :)

http://vidzi.tv/qxx6d3e9ihxs.html

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
Re: silencer evidence
« Reply #124 on: June 17, 2016, 08:16:PM »
No, I will be making a list, but it won't be made of bluff and dishonesty that is inherent in your posts. I wonder if we will get the same from you in respect to Sheila because her mental illness and a palm print on the bible is pathetic.















Even your hero thinks ......


here here caroline,let him post his list first,the burden of proof is on them,holding the rifle at at that angle is laughable :) 

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: silencer evidence
« Reply #125 on: June 17, 2016, 09:02:PM »
Allot of My posts are based on scientific studies and I often paste the relevant parts in them, they are supported opinions. bluff and dishonesty would be like for example saying photos of Sheila's feet are not Sheila's feet ,, OH Wait!  ;D

instead of being evasive or answering the question with a question why not just focus on the "Massive List" of circumstancial evidence sans Julie Mugford  ;D

Yes you do quote scientific studies, studies that have little relation to what you are explaining and often they refute even yo own point. You're a bluffer David! Where is the proof that the foot is Sheila's?

Funny isn't it, the list of circumstantial evidence (plus the silencer) convicted Bamber because they realised there was NO EVIDENCE to tie in Sheila other than she had a history of mental illness ...... and errrrr, hmmmmm? I'll wite the list in my own time and post it when I'm ready and none of your goading will make me post it any quicker.

« Last Edit: June 17, 2016, 09:17:PM by Caroline »
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: silencer evidence
« Reply #126 on: June 17, 2016, 09:08:PM »
here here caroline,let him post his list first,the burden of proof is on them,holding the rifle at at that angle is laughable :)

A classic case of David's dishonesty.  ::)
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
Re: silencer evidence
« Reply #127 on: June 17, 2016, 09:18:PM »
A classic case of David's dishonesty.  ::)
the angle shot was backed up with a diagram that proved nothing,the question still remains WHY would she shoot herself from that angle :)

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13779
Re: silencer evidence
« Reply #128 on: June 17, 2016, 09:25:PM »
Yes you do quote scientific studies, studies that have little relation to what you are explaining and often they refute even yo own point. You're a bluffer David! Where is the proof that the foot is Sheila's?

Funny isn't it, the list of circumstantial evidence (plus the silencer) convicted Bamber because they realised there was NO EVIDENCE to tie in Sheila other than she had a history of mental illness ...... and errrrr, hmmmmm? I'll wite the list in my own time and post it when I'm ready and none of you goading will make me post it any quicker.



I spoke to the person that obtained the photographs. You don't see Essex police coming out saying its wrong. You think Essex Police and the CCRC wont take the opportunity to expose AH and JB as liars if they knew they were not Sheila's feet?

Make your massive list I shall be waiting

« Last Edit: June 17, 2016, 09:26:PM by David1819 »

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: silencer evidence
« Reply #129 on: June 17, 2016, 09:34:PM »
I spoke to the person that obtained the photographs. You don't see Essex police coming out saying its wrong. You think Essex Police and the CCRC wont take the opportunity to expose AH and JB as liars if they knew they were not Sheila's feet?

Make your massive list I shall be waiting



You're less 'Fight Club' and more Bean! - Patience!!  ;D ;D ;D ;D




Few people have the imagination for reality

guest7363

  • Guest
Re: silencer evidence
« Reply #130 on: June 17, 2016, 09:35:PM »
You're less 'Fight Club' and more Bean! - Patience!!  ;D ;D ;D ;D




Ha Ha like it Caroline

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13779
Re: silencer evidence
« Reply #131 on: June 17, 2016, 09:38:PM »
A classic case of David's dishonesty.  ::)

It must be incredible how such a dishonest person manages to get so much scientific research to back up his claims  ::)

This study hypothesizes that women are less
likely than men to use suicide methods that disfigure the
face. Gender differences in the use of suicide methods that
disfigure the face were examined using medical examiner’s
files of 621 suicides covering a 10-year period from
Summit County, Ohio in the U.S. Results showed that
while firearms are the preferred method for both women
and men, women were less likely to shoot themselves in the
head. A series of logistic regression analyses revealed that
gender, age, stressful life events and prior suicide attempts
were predictors of methods that disfigure the face/head.
Significant differences between men and women in correlates
of suicide method emerged when the sample was split
by gender. The results support the position that women who
commit suicide are more likely than men who commit
suicide to avoid facial disfiguration.



women were more likely than men to use suicide
methods that would not disfigure their facial appearance.
Additionally, among firearm suicides, women should be
less likely than men to shoot themselves in the face/head.

For example, Cohle’s (1977) analysis of 121 handgun suicides
found that 88.9% of men shot themselves in the head
compared to 48.4% of women

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: silencer evidence
« Reply #132 on: June 17, 2016, 09:39:PM »
I spoke to the person that obtained the photographs. You don't see Essex police coming out saying its wrong. You think Essex Police and the CCRC wont take the opportunity to expose AH and JB as liars if they knew they were not Sheila's feet?

Make your massive list I shall be waiting



I know who was responsible for the article that claimed the feet were Sheila's - I think he is wrong and I think the police are just letting the supporters hang themselves. Why should they deny it when it's obvious if you're not wearing blinkers!

I'll leave the last word for Frank!



Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
Re: silencer evidence
« Reply #133 on: June 17, 2016, 09:39:PM »
I spoke to the person that obtained the photographs. You don't see Essex police coming out saying its wrong. You think Essex Police and the CCRC wont take the opportunity to expose AH and JB as liars if they knew they were not Sheila's feet?

Make your massive list I shall be waiting


who is it,'dont tell me you cant say',also ep are not interested they have no intention what so ever of giving jb media exposure by denying it  or accepting it,they are not playing jb's games they are leaving that to you,we all know he has as much chance of another appeal as i have becoming pope :)) :)) :))

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: silencer evidence
« Reply #134 on: June 17, 2016, 09:44:PM »
It must be incredible how such a dishonest person manages to get so much scientific research to back up his claims  ::)

This study hypothesizes that women are less
likely than men to use suicide methods that disfigure the
face. Gender differences in the use of suicide methods that
disfigure the face were examined using medical examiner’s
files of 621 suicides covering a 10-year period from
Summit County, Ohio in the U.S. Results showed that
while firearms are the preferred method for both women
and men, women were less likely to shoot themselves in the
head. A series of logistic regression analyses revealed that
gender, age, stressful life events and prior suicide attempts
were predictors of methods that disfigure the face/head.
Significant differences between men and women in correlates
of suicide method emerged when the sample was split
by gender. The results support the position that women who
commit suicide are more likely than men who commit
suicide to avoid facial disfiguration.



women were more likely than men to use suicide
methods that would not disfigure their facial appearance.
Additionally, among firearm suicides, women should be
less likely than men to shoot themselves in the face/head.

For example, Cohle’s (1977) analysis of 121 handgun suicides
found that 88.9% of men shot themselves in the head
compared to 48.4% of women


Yet another American study!
Few people have the imagination for reality