Author Topic: Why the hair in the silencer was Neville's:  (Read 9014 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Why the hair in the silencer was Neville's:
« on: June 05, 2016, 08:59:PM »
The official forensic evidence shows 100% the silencer was used.

There is no proof the silencer evidence was fabricated.

It was not rabbit hair. The silencer was not used after the massacre to shoot rabbits.

It was not a rabbit hair. Rabbit hair on the silencer pre massacre would have fallen off the silencer during the massacre.

It was certainly a human hair.

The hair was white. Neville had a full head of white hair.

Neville was beaten around the head with the rifle. Hair may have become loose.

Neville was shot in the head. A loose hair may have stuck to the wet blood already on the silencer.

One or all of Neville's last three shots may have been the last shots Bamber fired prior to taking the silencer off to burn Neville's back. After returning downstairs.   

Sheila was shot in the neck. It was not her hair.

June had darker hair. It was not her hair.

The twins did not receive contact shots. It was not their hair.

The twins were not beaten and bleeding on their heads prior to recieving their shots.
« Last Edit: June 05, 2016, 09:02:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Re: Why the hair in the silencer was Neville's:
« Reply #1 on: June 05, 2016, 09:10:PM »
A human/Nevilles hair in the silencer is more forensic proof the silencer was used.

As  my last thread shows, it was impossible for Sheila to commit the massacre and leave all this evidence on the silencer.

Investigations will be carried out to see if it was possible or impossible to expertly fabricate the silencer evidence.

'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Re: Why the hair in the silencer was Neville's:
« Reply #2 on: June 05, 2016, 09:14:PM »
The relatives said they found the silencer with the hair on. The police said they lost the hair.

Thought the police and relatives were singing from the same hymn sheet in an attempt to frame Bamber.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13785
Re: Why the hair in the silencer was Neville's:
« Reply #3 on: June 05, 2016, 09:25:PM »
The official forensic evidence shows 100% the silencer was used.

There is no proof the silencer evidence was fabricated.

It was not rabbit hair. The silencer was not used after the massacre to shoot rabbits.

It was not a rabbit hair. Rabbit hair on the silencer pre massacre would have fallen off the silencer during the massacre.

It was certainly a human hair.

The hair was white. Neville had a full head of white hair.

Neville was beaten around the head with the rifle. Hair may have become loose.

Neville was shot in the head. A loose hair may have stuck to the wet blood already on the silencer.

One or all of Neville's last three shots may have been the last shots Bamber fired prior to taking the silencer off to burn Neville's back. After returning downstairs.   

Sheila was shot in the neck. It was not her hair.

June had darker hair. It was not her hair.

The twins did not receive contact shots. It was not their hair.

The twins were not beaten and bleeding on their heads prior to recieving their shots.

Oh dear. Now you are relying on lost hair

John

  • Guest
Re: Why the hair in the silencer was Neville's:
« Reply #4 on: June 05, 2016, 09:30:PM »
The relatives said they found the silencer with the hair on. The police said they lost the hair.

Thought the police and relatives were singing from the same hymn sheet in an attempt to frame Bamber.

Just another piece of evidence which supports the family and the police Adam.

Nobody is claiming the police are perfect, far from it, but the evidence does add up to a guilty Jeremy Bamber.
« Last Edit: June 05, 2016, 09:33:PM by John »

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Why the hair in the silencer was Neville's:
« Reply #5 on: June 05, 2016, 09:33:PM »
That hair could have been hare-----------along with its blood.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Re: Why the hair in the silencer was Neville's:
« Reply #6 on: June 05, 2016, 09:35:PM »
Oh dear. Now you are relying on lost hair

Whose hair do you think it was ?

Both the police and relatives said there was a white hair on the silencer. There is no point in either lying. They would only lie if it was going to benefit a framing attempt.

But the hair was lost. The police admitting they lost this hinders a framing attempt.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Why the hair in the silencer was Neville's:
« Reply #7 on: June 05, 2016, 09:37:PM »
I'm telling you it was probably a hare.They're grey.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33781
Re: Why the hair in the silencer was Neville's:
« Reply #8 on: June 05, 2016, 09:38:PM »
I'm telling you it was probably a hare.They're grey.


There is no such thing as a grey hair OR a grey hare.

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13651
Re: Why the hair in the silencer was Neville's:
« Reply #9 on: June 05, 2016, 09:39:PM »
I'm telling you it was probably a hare.They're grey.
;D ;D ;D ;D

John

  • Guest
Re: Why the hair in the silencer was Neville's:
« Reply #10 on: June 05, 2016, 09:39:PM »
My own view is that Bamber had to use the silencer in order to reduce the sound of the shots.  The last thing he needed was nosey neighbours calling the police or even coming to the farmhouse to investigate.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Why the hair in the silencer was Neville's:
« Reply #11 on: June 05, 2016, 09:42:PM »

There is no such thing as a grey hair OR a grey hare.





We used to have them hanging in the pantry for use in jugged hare and they were a greyish brown predominantly grey.

You'd just argue black was white,you can't help it.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13785
Re: Why the hair in the silencer was Neville's:
« Reply #12 on: June 05, 2016, 09:43:PM »
My own view is that Bamber had to use the silencer in order to reduce the sound of the shots.  The last thing he needed was nosey neighbours calling the police or even coming to the farmhouse to investigate.

The sound moderator made very little difference to the sound


The reconstruction was held on an Army range after the court took a 28-mile drive in a police escorted convoy so that firearms expert Malcolm Fletcher could demonstrate the gun. The Chelmsford Crown Court jury of seven men and five women had asked to hear the sound of shots fired from the semi-automatic weapon. Mr Fletcher fired the un-silenced rifle five times into a huge block of soap which absorbed the impact of the bullets. Then he fired four times with the silencer in place. There appeared to be very little difference.


Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33781
Re: Why the hair in the silencer was Neville's:
« Reply #13 on: June 05, 2016, 09:46:PM »




We used to have them hanging in the pantry for use in jugged hare and they were a greyish brown predominantly grey.

You'd just argue black was white,you can't help it.

No, Lookout. I simply know, beyond a SHADOW of doubt, that there exists no such thing as a grey hair.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Re: Why the hair in the silencer was Neville's:
« Reply #14 on: June 05, 2016, 09:52:PM »
I'm telling you it was probably a hare.They're grey.

Any hair on the silencer pre massacre would have fallen off during the massacre. .

'Only I know what really happened that night'.