Author Topic: Sheila committing the massacre to match the silencer evidence: Impossible:  (Read 2353 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44324
For Sheila to carry out the massacre and match the silencer evidence she would have to -


Insert the silencer pre massacre:

Very unlikely Sheila could do this.
Very unlikely Sheila would have the opportunity to do this.


Chamber the rifle:

Very unlikely Sheila could do this. 


Fire 11 accurrate shots. Some at a moving target:

Very unlikely Sheila could do this.


Fight Neville while holding the rifle by the aga:

Impossible for Sheila to not be marked.
Very unlikely Sheila would win. 


Reload the rifle again:

Very unlikely Sheila could do this.


Chamber the rifle again:

Very unlikely Sheila could do this.


Shoot Neville again:
 

Take the silencer off to burn Neville's back:

Very unlikely Sheila could do this.
No possibility Sheila would consider this.


Put the silencer back on:

Very unlikely Sheila could do this.


Go upstairs and shoot the twins and June again:


Reload the rifle again:

Very unlikely Sheila could do this. 


Chamber the rifle again:

Very unlikely Sheila could do this. 
 

Shoot herself once with the silencer on.

Impossible for Sheila to do this. 


Take the silencer off and put it away downstairs:

Maybe impossible to do this.
The evidence shows this was not done.


Go back upstairs and shoot herself again:

Maybe impossible to do this after the first shot.
« Last Edit: June 05, 2016, 10:04:AM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44324
Going by the submitted and accepted silencer evidence, it was impossible for Sheila to have committed the massacre.

This makes Bamber guilty on this one piece of forensic evidence alone. Although there are over 100 pieces of forensic evidence. As well as a witness, a mountain of circumstantial evidence, one alive suspect with a motive, opportunity and no alibi.

I appreciate Bamber and supporters like to just focus on the silencer. The only option now is to claim this evidence was fabricated, rather than accept the silencer evidence and claim Sheila still committed the massacre.

I will shortly investigate whether it was physically possible for the silencer evidence to be so convincingly and successfully fabricated.
« Last Edit: June 05, 2016, 04:38:AM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44324
Another option for supporters is to dispute the blood evidence from the trial expert. Who said it was Sheila's blood.

This would mean my breakdown would be exactly the same as there was still human blood and aga paint. The only difference is Sheila would have put the silencer away prior to her first shot into herself. 

« Last Edit: June 05, 2016, 09:50:AM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44324
Supporters were recently given the option of saying the silencer was already on the rifle prior to the massacre.

This would suggest Bamber lied but it would negate the substantial obstacles Sheila had in inserting the silencer pre massacre. 

Sheila would have still have had to take off and put back on the silencer before and after burning Neville's back.

Not surprising no supporters have claimed Bamber lied.
« Last Edit: June 05, 2016, 09:53:AM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
In a nutshell,Sheila would NOT have been motivated by anger or revenge, as was evident with her quiet,sullen persona on the night of the murders,but a long-standing psychosis after giving birth which gives rise to feelings of suicide.Culpable homicide is something I'd have passed Shela's actions as because of her mental state.

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
excellent posts adam,i think we can put this one to bed ;) :)

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Supporters were recently given the option of saying the silencer was already on the rifle prior to the massacre.

This would suggest Bamber lied but it would negate the substantial obstacles Sheila had in inserting the silencer pre massacre. 

Sheila would have still have had to take off and put back on the silencer before and after burning Neville's back.

Not surprising no supporters have claimed Bamber lied.

Because - he didn't lie. You are only suggesting that he might have. Suggesting that somebody might have done something is 'not' evidence...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
excellent posts adam,i think we can put this one to bed ;) :)




That'll be right. ::)
Before my sixpenn'orth has been read ?

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490



That'll be right. ::)
Before my sixpenn'orth has been read ?
come on lookout sixpenn'orth.youve had a few gold soverigns worth ;)

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773



That'll be right. ::)
Before my sixpenn'orth has been read ?


I'm sure it's nothing personal, Lookout.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670

I'm sure it's nothing personal, Lookout.





I knew it wasn't.