Julie Mugford talking to the dead corpses

[Adam]

All David and Caroline needed to do was answer the questions on the 'Questions on the alleged forensic evidence breakthrough' thread. On either forum.

David just posted Bamber's written reply and indirectly said the evidence does not show he is innocent.

Caroline refused point blank to answer any questions, or say why she believes David stole her research from over three years ago.

[Neil]

All David and Caroline needed to do was answer the questions on the 'Questions on the alleged forensic evidence breakthrough' thread. On either forum.

David just posted Bamber's written reply and indirectly said the evidence does not show he is innocent.

Caroline refused point blank to answer any questions, or say why she believes David stole her research from over three years ago.

Adam, perhaps you should create a new thread..........

"Which piece of 'evidence' will emerge first, Mike's picture of Sheila on the bed, or Dave's pilfered forensics?"

 

[David1819]

Adam, perhaps you should create a new thread..........

"Which piece of 'evidence' will emerge first, Mike's picture of Sheila on the bed, or Dave's pilfered forensics?"

What an oxymoron.

Neil if my forensics is "pilfered" then it must already be on forum. One cannot steal something that has not already emerged

[Neil]

What an oxymoron.

Neil if my forensics is "pilfered" then it must already be on forum. One cannot steal something that has not already emerged

I didn't think you'd pick up on that!

You take my point?

[lookout]

 Why are the guilters so eager to know anything ? It doesn't make sense to me.  As I've said before,so far as they're concerned he's in his " rightful place "    Takes all sorts,I suppose.

[Caroline]

Why are the guilters so eager to know anything ? It doesn't make sense to me.  As I've said before,so far as they're concerned he's in his " rightful place "    Takes all sorts,I suppose.

I already know.

[Caroline]

Making things up again are we 

Not only was Jeremy interested so was his Barrister. Since your not in the loop Caroline i suggest you stop with the guessing, your track record so far is not good at all.

Ha, ha!! 'In the loop'? Why would I want to be 'in the loop' when I think he's guilty? I'm not interested in making a name for myself on the back of trying to get a mass murderer released. Keep making excuses for yourself. 

[Caroline]

What an oxymoron.

Neil if my forensics is "pilfered" then it must already be on forum. One cannot steal something that has not already emerged

So confirm it is not related to the palm print on the bible!

[David1819]

Ha, ha!! 'In the loop'? Why would I want to be 'in the loop' when I think he's guilty? I'm not interested in making a name for myself on the back of trying to get a mass murderer released. Keep making excuses for yourself. 

My point being since your not in the loop stop making baseless guesses about the situation, Your making a fool of yourself TBH.

[Caroline]

My point being since your not in the loop stop making baseless guesses about the situation, Your making a fool of yourself TBH.

Yes David, on that comment, I will consider the source and honesty isn't a word I would associate with you - 'sneaky' would be a far better description! But the fact that can't answer the question I have asked you several times, will give other members the opportunity to question why. You have simply done some additional work to something that was already on the forum - were it not already here, you wouldn't have been able to to write your report. 

[JackiePreece]

Yes David, on that comment, I will consider the source and honesty isn't a word I would associate with you - 'sneaky' would be a far better description! But the fact that can't answer the question I have asked you several times, will give other members the opportunity to question why. You have simply done some additional work to something that was already on the forum - were it not already here, you wouldn't have been able to to write your report.

I am reporting this post as goading
David has chosen to share his findings with Ngb and Jeremy's legal team
You are not in the loop and have never been in the loop
In all the thousands of posts you have made what new evidence have you uncovered?
There was all the hype about the useless PH book you are associated with that promised new evidence and never delivered
You will just have to be patient and wait instead of making these continued attacks on David

[Caroline]

I am reporting this post as goading
David has chosen to share his findings with Ngb and Jeremy's legal team
You are not in the loop and have never been in the loop
In all the thousands of posts you have made what new evidence have you uncovered?
There was all the hype about the useless PH book you are associated with that promised new evidence and never delivered
You will just have to be patient and wait instead of making these continued attacks on David

Excellent! You report away!!  - I would read back is I were you, you seem to have missed something crucial. I don't need to wait!

[Jane]

I am reporting this post as goading
David has chosen to share his findings with Ngb and Jeremy's legal team
You are not in the loop and have never been in the loop
In all the thousands of posts you have made what new evidence have you uncovered?
There was all the hype about the useless PH book you are associated with that promised new evidence and never delivered
You will just have to be patient and wait instead of making these continued attacks on David

Yeah, and then there was all the hype about how PH had contacted you to ask for your assistance -as opposed to how it was YOU who made first contact- which as we all recall you were willing to give freely and abundantly -hoping to see you're own name in the credits, were you?- until you discovered what side he was on. Now THAT would have been worth seeing. The Preece name in the credits of an anti Bamber book!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[David1819]

Yeah, and then there was all the hype about how PH had contacted you to ask for your assistance -as opposed to how it was YOU who made first contact- which as we all recall you were willing to give freely and abundantly -hoping to see you're own name in the credits, were you?- until you discovered what side he was on. Now THAT would have been worth seeing. The Preece name in the credits of an anti Bamber book!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

PH book is the worst reviewed book on the entire subject. I'm sure Jackie is relieved she got no mention in it.

[Caroline]

PH book is the worst reviewed book on the entire subject. I'm sure Jackie is relieved she got no mention in it.

And yet you were more than happy to latch onto the research that is included in this book. The part I donated, if the VERY foundation of your new evidence. Then you take the piss, suggesting that myself, Lookout and Jane never offer anything new - talk about a hypocrite!

Don't worry David, I won't reveal your new evidence - but next time you try and make a name for yourself, do it completely from your own findings or mention that you have developed someone else's. It's simply common courtesy.

And trying to belittle people just exposes your true colours and reveals what you are all about. 

At least you have Jackie in your corner though!